A Comparative Study to Determine the Outcome of Hepatic Encephalopathy who Have A Past History of Hepatic Encephalopathy And or Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Versus Who Have Not Such Using 7 Days Therapy of RifaximinAnd or Lactulose

Dr.ShyamalKanti Pal, Dr.Subhrajyoti Naskar, Dr.Gauranga Biswas, Dr.Jadab Kumar Jana, Dr.SK. Jeauddin, Dr.Soumitra Kumar Ghosh
{"title":"A Comparative Study to Determine the Outcome of Hepatic Encephalopathy who Have A Past History of Hepatic Encephalopathy And or Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Versus Who Have Not Such Using 7 Days Therapy of RifaximinAnd or Lactulose","authors":"Dr.ShyamalKanti Pal, Dr.Subhrajyoti Naskar, Dr.Gauranga Biswas, Dr.Jadab Kumar Jana, Dr.SK. Jeauddin, Dr.Soumitra Kumar Ghosh","doi":"10.9790/0853-1607025054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Hepatic encephalopathy is a reversible neuro-psychiatric syndrome occurring in majority of patients with decompensated chronic liver disease(CLD). Prognosis of Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) depends upon past h/o hematemesis/ melena and HE but not related to the aetiology of CLD. Rifaximin and lactulose have similar efficacy for treatment of acute HE . Purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of 3 modes of treatment for 7 days in terms of clinical improvement / deterioration who have or have not past h/o hematemesis/ melenaand or HE. Material and methods: After ethical clearance and consent from patient parties, 90 patients of HE of any cause and grade with or without past h/o hematemesis/melena and or HE, were categorise into different grades according to West Haven criteria and randomised to treat for 7 days with divided doses by either rifaximin 30 patients, lactulose 30 patients , rifaximin plus lactulose 30 patients. At the end, clinical improvement and deterioration were noticed. Results: Alcoholic CLD (63.33%) was the commonest. Clinical deterioration were commoner in chronic HCV (66.67%) than chronic HBV, alcoholic CLD. Patients with past h/o hematemesis /melena, clinical deterioration and improvement were 26.92% and 73.08% but without such , clinical deterioration and improvement were 2.63% and 97.37% . Patients with past h/o HE , clinical deterioration and improvement were 31.25% and 68.75% but without such past illness, clinical deteriorations and improvements were 0 and 100% . Conclusion: So clinical outcome is better in patients of HE without past h/o HE and hematemesis/melena. Keyword: Hepatic encephalopathy , chronic liver disease ,Rifaximin,Lactulose","PeriodicalId":14489,"journal":{"name":"IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences","volume":"18 1","pages":"50-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-1607025054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hepatic encephalopathy is a reversible neuro-psychiatric syndrome occurring in majority of patients with decompensated chronic liver disease(CLD). Prognosis of Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) depends upon past h/o hematemesis/ melena and HE but not related to the aetiology of CLD. Rifaximin and lactulose have similar efficacy for treatment of acute HE . Purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of 3 modes of treatment for 7 days in terms of clinical improvement / deterioration who have or have not past h/o hematemesis/ melenaand or HE. Material and methods: After ethical clearance and consent from patient parties, 90 patients of HE of any cause and grade with or without past h/o hematemesis/melena and or HE, were categorise into different grades according to West Haven criteria and randomised to treat for 7 days with divided doses by either rifaximin 30 patients, lactulose 30 patients , rifaximin plus lactulose 30 patients. At the end, clinical improvement and deterioration were noticed. Results: Alcoholic CLD (63.33%) was the commonest. Clinical deterioration were commoner in chronic HCV (66.67%) than chronic HBV, alcoholic CLD. Patients with past h/o hematemesis /melena, clinical deterioration and improvement were 26.92% and 73.08% but without such , clinical deterioration and improvement were 2.63% and 97.37% . Patients with past h/o HE , clinical deterioration and improvement were 31.25% and 68.75% but without such past illness, clinical deteriorations and improvements were 0 and 100% . Conclusion: So clinical outcome is better in patients of HE without past h/o HE and hematemesis/melena. Keyword: Hepatic encephalopathy , chronic liver disease ,Rifaximin,Lactulose
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有肝性脑病和上消化道出血病史的肝性脑病患者与无此病史的肝性脑病患者使用利福昔明或乳果糖治疗7天的预后比较研究
肝性脑病是一种可逆性神经精神综合征,发生在大多数失代偿性慢性肝病(CLD)患者中。肝性脑病(HE)的预后取决于过去的h/o呕血/黑黑和HE,但与CLD的病因无关。利福昔明与乳果糖治疗急性HE疗效相近。本研究的目的是比较三种治疗方式在7天内的临床改善/恶化方面的有效性,这些患者有或没有经历过h/o呕血/ melenand或HE。材料和方法:经伦理许可和患者同意后,根据West Haven标准将90例任何原因和级别的HE患者(有或没有过去的h/o呕血/黑黑和/或HE)分为不同级别,随机分为利福昔明30例、乳果糖30例、利福昔明加乳果糖30例,进行7天的分剂量治疗。最后观察临床改善和恶化情况。结果:酒精性CLD最常见,占63.33%。慢性HCV患者的临床恶化发生率(66.67%)高于慢性HBV、酒精性CLD患者。有h/o呕血/黑黑、临床恶化和改善的患者占26.92%和73.08%,无h/o呕血/黑黑、临床恶化和改善的患者占2.63%和97.37%。既往h/o HE患者临床恶化和改善分别为31.25%和68.75%,无既往h/o HE患者临床恶化和改善分别为0%和100%。结论:无h/o HE病史、无呕血/黑黑的HE患者临床预后较好。关键词:肝性脑病,慢性肝病,利福昔明,乳果糖
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Persistent Enlarged Thymus in an Adult Human Cadaver Choledocholithiasis And Acute Cholangitis Following PostCholecystectomy Clip Migration Paraduodenal Hernia: A Rare Case Report A Study on Hematological Abnormalities in Chronic Liver Diseases Screening of Risk Factors of Hypertension among Urban and Rural Populations of District-Hapur
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1