Chapter 3 Internal Controls, Decentralization, and Performance

IF 1.3 4区 计算机科学 Q4 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS Measurement & Control Pub Date : 2018-08-21 DOI:10.1108/S1479-351220180000033003
Antonio Dávila, Mahendra Gupta, Richard J. Palmer
{"title":"Chapter 3 Internal Controls, Decentralization, and Performance","authors":"Antonio Dávila, Mahendra Gupta, Richard J. Palmer","doi":"10.1108/S1479-351220180000033003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nInternal control mechanisms are fundamental to organizational governance; particularly, to the agency relationship associated with decentralization of decision rights. Management accounting and organizational literatures provide conflicting predictions on the association between decentralization and internal controls, with some research arguing that internal controls be tightened to mitigate the risks associated with greater decentralization of decision rights while other work avers that tighter internal controls defeat the purposes of decentralization. In this chapter, we argue that managers choose these two organizational design variables jointly. Capitalizing on a unique database of control practices in the purchasing and payment process within the procurement function, this chapter examines the relationship between control tightness – a critical characteristic of internal controls – and decentralization. Using a simultaneous equation model, the study finds that decentralization and internal control design are endogenously determined. Tight control is negatively associated with the level of decentralization, while decentralization has a positive effect on the tightness of control. These results reconcile the apparently contradictory results relating these two variables. The chapter also finds that decentralization and tight control mechanisms operate both independently and synergistically to improve performance.","PeriodicalId":49849,"journal":{"name":"Measurement & Control","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement & Control","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-351220180000033003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Internal control mechanisms are fundamental to organizational governance; particularly, to the agency relationship associated with decentralization of decision rights. Management accounting and organizational literatures provide conflicting predictions on the association between decentralization and internal controls, with some research arguing that internal controls be tightened to mitigate the risks associated with greater decentralization of decision rights while other work avers that tighter internal controls defeat the purposes of decentralization. In this chapter, we argue that managers choose these two organizational design variables jointly. Capitalizing on a unique database of control practices in the purchasing and payment process within the procurement function, this chapter examines the relationship between control tightness – a critical characteristic of internal controls – and decentralization. Using a simultaneous equation model, the study finds that decentralization and internal control design are endogenously determined. Tight control is negatively associated with the level of decentralization, while decentralization has a positive effect on the tightness of control. These results reconcile the apparently contradictory results relating these two variables. The chapter also finds that decentralization and tight control mechanisms operate both independently and synergistically to improve performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第3章内部控制、分权与绩效
内部控制机制是组织治理的基础;特别是与决策权分散相关的代理关系。管理会计和组织文献对权力下放和内部控制之间的关系提供了相互矛盾的预测,一些研究认为,应该加强内部控制,以减轻与更大的决策权下放相关的风险,而另一些研究则断言,更严格的内部控制会破坏权力下放的目的。在本章中,我们认为管理者共同选择这两个组织设计变量。本章利用采购职能部门内采购和付款过程中控制实践的独特数据库,探讨了控制严密性- -内部控制的一个关键特征- -与权力下放之间的关系。利用联立方程模型,研究发现分权和内部控制设计是内生决定的。严格控制与权力下放水平负相关,而权力下放对控制的严格程度有积极影响。这些结果调和了这两个变量之间明显矛盾的结果。本章还发现,权力下放和严格的控制机制既独立又协同地发挥作用,以提高绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Measurement & Control
Measurement & Control 工程技术-仪器仪表
自引率
10.00%
发文量
164
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Measurement and Control publishes peer-reviewed practical and technical research and news pieces from both the science and engineering industry and academia. Whilst focusing more broadly on topics of relevance for practitioners in instrumentation and control, the journal also includes updates on both product and business announcements and information on technical advances.
期刊最新文献
Vibration errors compensation method based on self-feature registration for the 3-D dynamic measurement of metallic sealing ring forming surface Research on imperfect condition-based maintenance strategy based on accelerated degradation process A robot path planning method using improved Harris Hawks optimization algorithm Super-twisting sliding mode finite time control of power-line inspection robot with external disturbances and input delays Research on a novel fault diagnosis method for gearbox based on matrix distance feature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1