Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Metformin Use in Hospitalized, Non–Critically Ill Patients

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Pharmacy Technology Pub Date : 2020-03-13 DOI:10.1177/8755122520911689
Tahnia Alauddin, Sarah E. Petite
{"title":"Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Metformin Use in Hospitalized, Non–Critically Ill Patients","authors":"Tahnia Alauddin, Sarah E. Petite","doi":"10.1177/8755122520911689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Contraindications and precautions to metformin have limited inpatient use, and limited evidence exists evaluating metformin in hospitalized patients. Objective: This study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of inpatient metformin use. Methods: This study was an observational, retrospective, cohort study at an academic medical center between June 1, 2016, and May 31, 2018. Hospitalized adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving at least 1 metformin dose were included. The primary endpoint was to identify hospitalized patients using metformin with at least 1 contraindication or precautionary warning against use. Secondary endpoints included assessing metformin efficacy with glycemic control, characterizing adverse outcomes of inpatient metformin, and comparing the efficacy of metformin-containing regimens. Results: Two hundred patients were included. There were 126 incidences of potentially unsafe use identified in 111 patients (55.5%). The most common reasons were age ≥65 years (47%), heart failure diagnosis (7.5%), and metformin within 48 hours of contrast (6%). Metformin was contraindicated in 2 patients (1%) with an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2. The overall median daily blood glucose was 146 mg/dL (interquartile range [IQR] = 122-181). Patients were divided into 3 groups: metformin monotherapy, metformin plus oral antihyperglycemic therapy, and metformin plus insulin. The median daily blood glucoses were 129 mg/dL (IQR = 110-152), 154 mg/dL (IQR = 133-178), and 174 mg/dL (IQR = 142-203; P < .001), respectively. Two patients (1%) developed acute kidney injury, and no patients developed lactic acidosis. Conclusions: Metformin was associated with goal glycemic levels in hospitalized patients with no adverse outcomes. These results suggest the potential for metformin use in hospitalized, non–critically ill patients.","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":"124 1","pages":"102 - 109"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/8755122520911689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Contraindications and precautions to metformin have limited inpatient use, and limited evidence exists evaluating metformin in hospitalized patients. Objective: This study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of inpatient metformin use. Methods: This study was an observational, retrospective, cohort study at an academic medical center between June 1, 2016, and May 31, 2018. Hospitalized adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving at least 1 metformin dose were included. The primary endpoint was to identify hospitalized patients using metformin with at least 1 contraindication or precautionary warning against use. Secondary endpoints included assessing metformin efficacy with glycemic control, characterizing adverse outcomes of inpatient metformin, and comparing the efficacy of metformin-containing regimens. Results: Two hundred patients were included. There were 126 incidences of potentially unsafe use identified in 111 patients (55.5%). The most common reasons were age ≥65 years (47%), heart failure diagnosis (7.5%), and metformin within 48 hours of contrast (6%). Metformin was contraindicated in 2 patients (1%) with an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2. The overall median daily blood glucose was 146 mg/dL (interquartile range [IQR] = 122-181). Patients were divided into 3 groups: metformin monotherapy, metformin plus oral antihyperglycemic therapy, and metformin plus insulin. The median daily blood glucoses were 129 mg/dL (IQR = 110-152), 154 mg/dL (IQR = 133-178), and 174 mg/dL (IQR = 142-203; P < .001), respectively. Two patients (1%) developed acute kidney injury, and no patients developed lactic acidosis. Conclusions: Metformin was associated with goal glycemic levels in hospitalized patients with no adverse outcomes. These results suggest the potential for metformin use in hospitalized, non–critically ill patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二甲双胍在住院非危重患者中的安全性和有效性评价
背景:二甲双胍的禁忌症和注意事项限制了住院患者的使用,并且评估二甲双胍在住院患者中的应用证据有限。目的:本研究旨在确定住院患者使用二甲双胍的安全性和有效性。方法:本研究是一项观察性、回顾性、队列研究,于2016年6月1日至2018年5月31日在某学术医学中心进行。接受至少1剂二甲双胍治疗的住院成人2型糖尿病患者被纳入研究。主要终点是确定住院患者使用二甲双胍至少有一个禁忌症或预防性警告。次要终点包括评估二甲双胍与血糖控制的疗效,表征住院二甲双胍的不良结局,以及比较含二甲双胍方案的疗效。结果:纳入200例患者。111例患者中发现126例潜在不安全用药(55.5%)。最常见的原因是年龄≥65岁(47%)、心衰诊断(7.5%)和48小时内使用二甲双胍(6%)。2例(1%)估计肾小球滤过率≤30ml /min/1.73 m2的患者禁用二甲双胍。总体每日血糖中位数为146 mg/dL(四分位数范围[IQR] = 122-181)。患者分为3组:单用二甲双胍治疗、口服二甲双胍联合降糖治疗、二甲双胍联合胰岛素治疗。中位日血糖分别为129 mg/dL (IQR = 110-152)、154 mg/dL (IQR = 133-178)和174 mg/dL (IQR = 142-203;P < 0.001)。2例(1%)患者发生急性肾损伤,无患者发生乳酸酸中毒。结论:二甲双胍与住院患者的目标血糖水平相关,且无不良结局。这些结果提示二甲双胍在住院非危重患者中的应用潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Technology
Journal of Pharmacy Technology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: For both pharmacists and technicians, jPT provides valuable information for those interested in the entire body of pharmacy practice. jPT covers new drugs, products, and equipment; therapeutic trends; organizational, legal, and educational activities; drug distribution and administration; and includes continuing education articles.
期刊最新文献
Persistence After Switching From Adalimumab Biosimilar MSB11022 to Adalimumab Biosimilar GP2017 in Patients With Chronic Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases. State Variation in Uptake of Pharmacy-Based CLIA-Waived Testing: Impact of Laws and Regulations. Risk of Tendon Injury in Patients Treated With Fluoroquinolone (FQ) Vs Non-Fluoroquinolone Antibiotics for Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). Impact of Nonmedical Switches From Reference Infliximab to Biosimilars on Disease Control Within a Rheumatology Practice. Effectiveness and Safety of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor Continuation in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Late-Stage Chronic Kidney Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1