From Reference to Knowledge Repositories: On Mimetic Aspects of Kalamkari Making

IF 0.5 0 ASIAN STUDIES South Asian Studies Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1080/02666030.2021.1969807
Rajarshi Sengupta
{"title":"From Reference to Knowledge Repositories: On Mimetic Aspects of Kalamkari Making","authors":"Rajarshi Sengupta","doi":"10.1080/02666030.2021.1969807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay seeks to explore the significance of mimetic actions in making the knowledge reserve of the early modern kalamkari textile makers of the Coromandel region, southern India. A shared pool of visuals found in these textiles, south Indian murals, Deccani architecture, and artifacts allow us to assess the histories of the artisans who engaged with cross-cultural and intermedial mobilities. Images on these textiles were mediated, often supplied by their patrons. This compelled the artisans to explore the fullest possibilities of their knowledge employing mimetic actions, which are generally misunderstood as ‘copying’ or ‘imitation’. Contemporary woodblock making in Pedana, Andhra Pradesh, present examples to reflect on these actions as the knowledge practice of early modern textile makers. The layered actions of mediating and reproducing images are deeply informed by artisanal decision-making and thus offer insights to potentially retrieve their histories. I propose the reciprocity of mimetic flow in the early modern Deccani visual culture is a result of artisanal decision – a controlled act informed by artisanal resistance enabling transmission of visual knowledge. Further, I will elaborate on the relevance of the idea of ‘copying’ in terms of synthesizing and developing repositories of artisanal knowledge.","PeriodicalId":52006,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Studies","volume":"26 1","pages":"51 - 71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1095","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02666030.2021.1969807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay seeks to explore the significance of mimetic actions in making the knowledge reserve of the early modern kalamkari textile makers of the Coromandel region, southern India. A shared pool of visuals found in these textiles, south Indian murals, Deccani architecture, and artifacts allow us to assess the histories of the artisans who engaged with cross-cultural and intermedial mobilities. Images on these textiles were mediated, often supplied by their patrons. This compelled the artisans to explore the fullest possibilities of their knowledge employing mimetic actions, which are generally misunderstood as ‘copying’ or ‘imitation’. Contemporary woodblock making in Pedana, Andhra Pradesh, present examples to reflect on these actions as the knowledge practice of early modern textile makers. The layered actions of mediating and reproducing images are deeply informed by artisanal decision-making and thus offer insights to potentially retrieve their histories. I propose the reciprocity of mimetic flow in the early modern Deccani visual culture is a result of artisanal decision – a controlled act informed by artisanal resistance enabling transmission of visual knowledge. Further, I will elaborate on the relevance of the idea of ‘copying’ in terms of synthesizing and developing repositories of artisanal knowledge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参考知识库:论Kalamkari制作的模仿方面
本文旨在探讨模仿行动的意义,使知识储备的早期现代kalamkari纺织品制造商的科罗曼德尔地区,印度南部。在这些纺织品、南印度壁画、德卡尼建筑和文物中发现的共同视觉效果使我们能够评估参与跨文化和中间流动的工匠的历史。这些纺织品上的图像是经过调解的,通常由他们的赞助人提供。这迫使工匠们利用模仿行为来探索他们知识的全部可能性,这通常被误解为“复制”或“模仿”。安德拉邦佩达纳的当代木版制作,作为早期现代纺织制造商的知识实践,提供了反映这些行为的例子。调解和再现图像的分层行动深受手工决策的影响,因此提供了潜在的检索历史的见解。我提出,早期现代德卡尼视觉文化中模仿流的互惠性是手工决策的结果——一种由手工抵抗告知的受控行为,使视觉知识得以传播。此外,我将详细阐述“复制”概念在合成和开发手工知识库方面的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
South Asian Studies
South Asian Studies ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Were the Cretulae (Clay Sealings) from the Indus Port Town of Lothal Part of an Administrative Archive? Contextual, Interpretive, and Comparative Evidence Mudgagiri, a Pāla “Jayaskandhāvāra”: An Assessment of Recent Sculptural and Inscriptional Findings at Munger, Bihar Bamiyan Comes to Bangkok: Situating the Buddha of the Cave Museum at Wat Saket Why Ananda Coomaraswamy’s Time in Sri Lanka (Still) Matters Aesthetic of Light and Time: An Intellectual History of Pictorialism from India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1