A bigger challenge: types of perceived corporate hypocrisy in employees and their resulting attitudes and turnover intentions

Saheli Goswami
{"title":"A bigger challenge: types of perceived corporate hypocrisy in employees and their resulting attitudes and turnover intentions","authors":"Saheli Goswami","doi":"10.1108/joepp-07-2021-0186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this study was to investigate the comparative impacts of the four salient aspects of employees' perceived corporate hypocrisy (PCH), namely PCH based on psychological contract breach (CB), perceived lack of morality (MOR), double standards (DS) and word–action gap (WA), on employees' turnover intentions and attitudes towards corporations.Design/methodology/approachA self-reported online survey was designed to collect data from 520 retail employees using Qualtrics.FindingsPCH-MOR had the most detrimental effect on employees' attitudes and turnover intentions compared to other PCH types. PCH-DS had the second highest negative impact on employees' attitudes, whereas PCH-WA was the second highest predictor of turnover intentions. Employees' negative responses were more concerning for PCH attributed to organizational aspects than the personnel aspects of corporations. PCH-CB was observed to have no significant impact on employees.Practical implicationsThe study generated a deeper understanding of the multi-faceted PCH. It identified the types of PCH that need to be prioritized to guide corporations in attributing the correct areas of concern and determining the scopes of management.Originality/valueWhile prior research conceptualized employees' PCH as a single-dimensional construct, this study is the first to acknowledge its multi-faceted nature. Although a few studies theoretically proposed its salient aspects, this study presented empirical evidence of this framework, comparing their varied impacts on employees. Contrary to the dominant notion of characterizing PCH as WA, this research presented evidence that employees' PCH characterized by a perceived lack of morality was more worrisome. This study presented empirical evidence for the organizational and individual levels of PCH, noting PCH attributed to organizational aspects as a bigger concern.","PeriodicalId":51810,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Effectiveness-People and Performance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Effectiveness-People and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/joepp-07-2021-0186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to investigate the comparative impacts of the four salient aspects of employees' perceived corporate hypocrisy (PCH), namely PCH based on psychological contract breach (CB), perceived lack of morality (MOR), double standards (DS) and word–action gap (WA), on employees' turnover intentions and attitudes towards corporations.Design/methodology/approachA self-reported online survey was designed to collect data from 520 retail employees using Qualtrics.FindingsPCH-MOR had the most detrimental effect on employees' attitudes and turnover intentions compared to other PCH types. PCH-DS had the second highest negative impact on employees' attitudes, whereas PCH-WA was the second highest predictor of turnover intentions. Employees' negative responses were more concerning for PCH attributed to organizational aspects than the personnel aspects of corporations. PCH-CB was observed to have no significant impact on employees.Practical implicationsThe study generated a deeper understanding of the multi-faceted PCH. It identified the types of PCH that need to be prioritized to guide corporations in attributing the correct areas of concern and determining the scopes of management.Originality/valueWhile prior research conceptualized employees' PCH as a single-dimensional construct, this study is the first to acknowledge its multi-faceted nature. Although a few studies theoretically proposed its salient aspects, this study presented empirical evidence of this framework, comparing their varied impacts on employees. Contrary to the dominant notion of characterizing PCH as WA, this research presented evidence that employees' PCH characterized by a perceived lack of morality was more worrisome. This study presented empirical evidence for the organizational and individual levels of PCH, noting PCH attributed to organizational aspects as a bigger concern.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个更大的挑战是:员工感知到的企业虚伪类型,以及由此产生的态度和离职意图
目的本研究旨在探讨员工感知企业虚伪(PCH)的四个显著方面,即基于心理契约违约(CB)、感知道德缺失(MOR)、双重标准(DS)和言语-行动缺口(WA)对员工离职意向和对企业态度的比较影响。设计/方法/方法一项自我报告的在线调查旨在使用Qualtrics从520名零售员工中收集数据。研究发现,与其他类型的PCH相比,spch - mor对员工态度和离职意向的影响最为不利。PCH-DS对员工态度的负向影响第二高,而PCH-WA对离职意向的负向影响第二高。员工的负面反应更关注组织方面的PCH,而不是公司的人事方面。PCH-CB对员工无显著影响。实际意义本研究加深了对PCH多方面的认识。它确定了需要优先考虑的PCH类型,以指导公司确定正确的关注领域和确定管理范围。原创性/价值先前的研究将员工的个人创新能力定义为一个单一维度的结构,而本研究首次承认其具有多面性。虽然少数研究从理论上提出了其突出方面,但本研究提出了该框架的经验证据,比较了它们对员工的不同影响。与将PCH定性为WA的主流观念相反,本研究提供的证据表明,以被认为缺乏道德为特征的员工PCH更令人担忧。本研究提出了组织和个人层面的PCH的经验证据,指出组织方面的PCH更受关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
The effects of working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic on work–life balance, work–family conflict and employee burnout Climate of fear and job apathy as fallout of supervisory nonphysical hostility toward casual workers in the banking industry Agile work practices and team creativity: the mediating role of team efficacy Performance management systems in a shared service centre: an exploration of organisational injustice Leaders' Machiavellianism and subordinates' task performance: a multilevel investigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1