How Religion Impacts Deception and Trust Behavior: Evidence From a Lab-in-the-Field Experiment in China

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.1037/npe0000095
Hui Xu, Yingxi Liu, Jie Liang
{"title":"How Religion Impacts Deception and Trust Behavior: Evidence From a Lab-in-the-Field Experiment in China","authors":"Hui Xu, Yingxi Liu, Jie Liang","doi":"10.1037/npe0000095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reports data from a lab-in-the-field experiment in China to provide new evidence on the impact of religion (Christianity) and religiosity on deception and trust. Although extant studies are mainly from countries where Christianity is part of the common cultural traditions, China provides a unique context to test these effects. We find that, compared with non-Christians, Christians are significantly less likely to cheat and demonstrate a significantly higher level of trust in all conditions tested. We also find variation among Christians by religiosity. Specifically, Christians with higher religiosity exhibit a significantly higher rate of trust and a lower rate of deception than the less-religious Christians. Further, our data show that both Christians and non-Christians trust Christians significantly more than others. We also find that both Christians and non-Christians are sensitive to consequences when deciding whether to lie.","PeriodicalId":45695,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics","volume":"06 1","pages":"239–248"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/npe0000095","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This article reports data from a lab-in-the-field experiment in China to provide new evidence on the impact of religion (Christianity) and religiosity on deception and trust. Although extant studies are mainly from countries where Christianity is part of the common cultural traditions, China provides a unique context to test these effects. We find that, compared with non-Christians, Christians are significantly less likely to cheat and demonstrate a significantly higher level of trust in all conditions tested. We also find variation among Christians by religiosity. Specifically, Christians with higher religiosity exhibit a significantly higher rate of trust and a lower rate of deception than the less-religious Christians. Further, our data show that both Christians and non-Christians trust Christians significantly more than others. We also find that both Christians and non-Christians are sensitive to consequences when deciding whether to lie.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宗教如何影响欺骗和信任行为:来自中国实验室的证据
本文报告了在中国进行的一项野外实验的数据,为宗教(基督教)和宗教信仰对欺骗和信任的影响提供了新的证据。尽管现有的研究主要来自基督教作为共同文化传统一部分的国家,但中国提供了一个独特的背景来检验这些影响。我们发现,与非基督徒相比,基督徒明显不太可能作弊,并且在所有测试条件下都表现出更高的信任水平。我们还发现,基督徒之间的宗教信仰存在差异。具体来说,与不那么虔诚的基督徒相比,虔诚程度较高的基督徒表现出明显更高的信任度和更低的欺骗率。此外,我们的数据显示,基督徒和非基督徒都比其他人更信任基督徒。我们还发现,在决定是否说谎时,基督徒和非基督徒都对后果很敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Self-reported and electroencephalogram responses to evaluate sponsorship congruence efficacy. Is geographical location really dead in the online world? An event-related potentials study. Motivating risky choices increases risk taking. Supplemental Material for From Genes to Performance: Dopaminergic Modulation of Decision Making in a Stock Market Simulation Supplemental Material for Motivating Risky Choices Increases Risk Taking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1