In Vitro Percutaneous Absorption of Nonylphenol (NP) and Nonylphenol Ethoxylates (NPE-4 and NPE-9) in Isolated Perfused Skin

N. Monteiro-Riviere, J. V. Van Miller, G. Simon, R. Joiner, J. Brooks, J. Riviere
{"title":"In Vitro Percutaneous Absorption of Nonylphenol (NP) and Nonylphenol Ethoxylates (NPE-4 and NPE-9) in Isolated Perfused Skin","authors":"N. Monteiro-Riviere, J. V. Van Miller, G. Simon, R. Joiner, J. Brooks, J. Riviere","doi":"10.1081/CUS-120019325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Skin contact with nonylphenol ethoxylates (NPE), a group of widely used surfactants, is the primary source of human exposure. Previous studies have shown that the absorption of NPE through human and animal skin in vitro is limited (<1% over 8 hr) [Monteiro-Riviere et al. Toxicol Indust Health 2000; 16:49–57]. The purpose of this study was to examine the percutaneous absorption of NPE and the chemical precursor, nonylphenol (NP), in the isolated perfused porcine skin flap (IPPSF) model for comparison to the in vitro porcine skin flow through (PSFT) diffusion studies. The IPPSF model is considered to accurately predict absorption of chemicals through human skin. The IPPSF was dosed with 100 μl of 1% 14C ring-labeled NP, 14C ring-labeled NPE-4, or 14C ring-labeled NPE-9 in aqueous polyethylene glycol (PEG-400) solution and perfused for 8 hr. All three chemicals were minimally absorbed, with only approximately 0.1% of the applied dose found in the perfusate over the 8-hr collection. This absorbed material represents the systemic exposure expected following skin contact in humans. In addition, less than 1% of the applied dose penetrated into the stratum corneum and underlying dermis, but remained within the skin and did not go through to the perfusate. Thus, the overall potential systemic exposure to these chemicals from skin contact, using a model considered similar to human skin in vivo, is less than 1%. The absorption results of this study were consistent with previous studies in the PSFT model. The penetration of NPEs and NP in the IPPSF was less than the PSFT and is probably more predictive of in vivo human absorption as this model is physiologically closer to human skin. This suggests that the overall potential for skin absorption of these chemicals in humans is even lower than previous estimates.","PeriodicalId":17547,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Toxicology-cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology","volume":"9 1","pages":"1 - 11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Toxicology-cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1081/CUS-120019325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Skin contact with nonylphenol ethoxylates (NPE), a group of widely used surfactants, is the primary source of human exposure. Previous studies have shown that the absorption of NPE through human and animal skin in vitro is limited (<1% over 8 hr) [Monteiro-Riviere et al. Toxicol Indust Health 2000; 16:49–57]. The purpose of this study was to examine the percutaneous absorption of NPE and the chemical precursor, nonylphenol (NP), in the isolated perfused porcine skin flap (IPPSF) model for comparison to the in vitro porcine skin flow through (PSFT) diffusion studies. The IPPSF model is considered to accurately predict absorption of chemicals through human skin. The IPPSF was dosed with 100 μl of 1% 14C ring-labeled NP, 14C ring-labeled NPE-4, or 14C ring-labeled NPE-9 in aqueous polyethylene glycol (PEG-400) solution and perfused for 8 hr. All three chemicals were minimally absorbed, with only approximately 0.1% of the applied dose found in the perfusate over the 8-hr collection. This absorbed material represents the systemic exposure expected following skin contact in humans. In addition, less than 1% of the applied dose penetrated into the stratum corneum and underlying dermis, but remained within the skin and did not go through to the perfusate. Thus, the overall potential systemic exposure to these chemicals from skin contact, using a model considered similar to human skin in vivo, is less than 1%. The absorption results of this study were consistent with previous studies in the PSFT model. The penetration of NPEs and NP in the IPPSF was less than the PSFT and is probably more predictive of in vivo human absorption as this model is physiologically closer to human skin. This suggests that the overall potential for skin absorption of these chemicals in humans is even lower than previous estimates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
壬基酚(NP)和壬基酚乙氧基酸酯(NPE-4和NPE-9)在离体灌注皮肤中的体外经皮吸收
壬基酚聚氧乙烯酯(NPE)是一组广泛使用的表面活性剂,皮肤接触是人类暴露的主要来源。先前的研究表明,NPE在体外通过人和动物皮肤的吸收是有限的(在8小时内<1%)[Monteiro-Riviere等]。毒物工业卫生2000;16:49-57]。本研究的目的是研究NPE及其化学前体壬基酚(NP)在离体灌注猪皮瓣(IPPSF)模型中的经皮吸收,并与体外猪皮肤流动(PSFT)扩散研究进行比较。IPPSF模型被认为可以准确地预测化学物质通过人体皮肤的吸收。将100 μl 1% 14C环标记NP、14C环标记NPE-4或14C环标记NPE-9分别加入聚乙二醇(PEG-400)水溶液中,灌胃8小时。所有三种化学物质都被最低限度地吸收,在8小时的收集过程中,灌注液中仅发现约0.1%的施加剂量。这种吸收的物质代表人体皮肤接触后预期的全身暴露。此外,只有不到1%的剂量能穿透角质层和真皮,但仍停留在皮肤内,没有进入灌注液。因此,使用被认为与体内人体皮肤相似的模型,皮肤接触这些化学物质的总体潜在全身暴露量小于1%。本研究的吸收结果与前人在PSFT模型中的研究结果一致。NPEs和NP在IPPSF中的渗透比PSFT少,可能更能预测体内人体吸收,因为该模型在生理上更接近人体皮肤。这表明人类皮肤吸收这些化学物质的总体潜力甚至比以前的估计还要低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Persistent Palmar Plaques—Another Possible Cutaneous Sign of Mercury Poisoning Ocular Side Effects Associated with Systemic Isotretinoin Retinoic Acid Reduces Ocular Elongation in Chicks with Form‐Deprivation Myopia Corneal Organ Culture Model for Assessing Epithelial Recovery After Surfactant Exposure Alterations of Calcium Homeostasis Affect the Survival of Human Retinal Epithelial Cells
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1