What input-language is the best choice for high level synthesis (HLS)?

D. Gajski, T. Austin, Steve Svoboda
{"title":"What input-language is the best choice for high level synthesis (HLS)?","authors":"D. Gajski, T. Austin, Steve Svoboda","doi":"10.1145/1837274.1837489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As of 2010, over 30 of the world's top semiconductor / systems companies have adopted HLS. In 2009, SOCs tape-outs containing IPs developed using HLS exceeded 50 for the first time. Now that the practicality and value of HLS is established, engineers are turning to the question of “what input-language works best?” The answer is critical because it drives key decisions regarding the tool/methodology infrastructure companies will create around this new flow. ANSI-C/C++ advocates cite ease-of-learning, simulation speed. SystemC advocates make similar claims, and point to SystemC's hardware-oriented features. Proponents of BSV (Bluespec SystemVerilog) claim that language enhances architectural transparency and control. To maximize the benefits of HLS, companies must consider many factors and tradeoffs.","PeriodicalId":87346,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. Design Automation Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"857-858"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. Design Automation Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1837274.1837489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

As of 2010, over 30 of the world's top semiconductor / systems companies have adopted HLS. In 2009, SOCs tape-outs containing IPs developed using HLS exceeded 50 for the first time. Now that the practicality and value of HLS is established, engineers are turning to the question of “what input-language works best?” The answer is critical because it drives key decisions regarding the tool/methodology infrastructure companies will create around this new flow. ANSI-C/C++ advocates cite ease-of-learning, simulation speed. SystemC advocates make similar claims, and point to SystemC's hardware-oriented features. Proponents of BSV (Bluespec SystemVerilog) claim that language enhances architectural transparency and control. To maximize the benefits of HLS, companies must consider many factors and tradeoffs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哪种输入语言是高级合成(HLS)的最佳选择?
截至2010年,超过30家世界顶级半导体/系统公司采用了HLS。2009年,使用HLS开发的包含ip的soc带出量首次超过50个。既然HLS的实用性和价值已经确立,工程师们正在转向“哪种输入语言效果最好?”这个问题的答案是至关重要的,因为它推动了公司围绕这个新流程创建的工具/方法基础设施的关键决策。ANSI-C/ c++的倡导者引用了易于学习,模拟速度快。SystemC的拥护者也提出了类似的主张,并指出了SystemC面向硬件的特性。BSV (Bluespec SystemVerilog)的支持者声称语言增强了架构的透明性和控制力。为了使HLS的效益最大化,公司必须考虑许多因素和权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Muffin: A Framework Toward Multi-Dimension AI Fairness by Uniting Off-the-Shelf Models. DAC '22: 59th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, San Francisco, California, USA, July 10 - 14, 2022 General Chair's Message Exploiting Computation Reuse for Stencil Accelerators. Reconciling remote attestation and safety-critical operation on simple IoT devices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1