The influence of two instrumentation techniques with two sealers on post-operative pain after endodontic treatment "randomized clinical trial"

Dr. Mohamed Sohail Jacoub , Professor Medhat Abdel-Rahman Kataia , Professor Ahmed Abdel Rahman Hashem , Dr. ElSaeed Abdel Hafiz
{"title":"The influence of two instrumentation techniques with two sealers on post-operative pain after endodontic treatment \"randomized clinical trial\"","authors":"Dr. Mohamed Sohail Jacoub ,&nbsp;Professor Medhat Abdel-Rahman Kataia ,&nbsp;Professor Ahmed Abdel Rahman Hashem ,&nbsp;Dr. ElSaeed Abdel Hafiz","doi":"10.1016/j.fdj.2018.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Postoperative pain is one of the primary problems in endodontic therapy and an unpleasant situation for both patient and clinician.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The aim of this Study was to assess degree of Post-Operative Pain after Endodontic Treatment done using two different instrumentation techniques with combination of two different sealers.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>84 mandibular first and second molars were selected and randomly divided into four groups, Group 1 was prepared using Protaper Next and obturated using AH plus Sealer. Group 2, the molars were prepared using Protaper Next and obturated using Total Fill Sealer. Group 3,the molars were prepared using WaveOne Gold and obturated using AH Plus Sealer and Group 4, the molars were prepared using WaveOne Gold and obturated using Total Fill Sealer. Assessment of post-operative pain by using The Visual Analogue Scale Pain evaluation was done 3 times for each patient, Post-operatively after 12, 24 and 48 h respectively. Finally the data was tabulated and statistically analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Neither the type of file nor the type of sealer affected the post-operative pain, however time showed statistically significant difference between (12 h), (24 h) and (48 h) respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Protaper next versus WaveOne Gold was found to have no influence regarding post-operative pain, The pain intensity showed significant decrease by time in all groups especially after 24 h post-operatively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100562,"journal":{"name":"Future Dental Journal","volume":"4 2","pages":"Pages 175-180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.fdj.2018.10.001","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2314718018300284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Introduction

Postoperative pain is one of the primary problems in endodontic therapy and an unpleasant situation for both patient and clinician.

Purpose

The aim of this Study was to assess degree of Post-Operative Pain after Endodontic Treatment done using two different instrumentation techniques with combination of two different sealers.

Materials and methods

84 mandibular first and second molars were selected and randomly divided into four groups, Group 1 was prepared using Protaper Next and obturated using AH plus Sealer. Group 2, the molars were prepared using Protaper Next and obturated using Total Fill Sealer. Group 3,the molars were prepared using WaveOne Gold and obturated using AH Plus Sealer and Group 4, the molars were prepared using WaveOne Gold and obturated using Total Fill Sealer. Assessment of post-operative pain by using The Visual Analogue Scale Pain evaluation was done 3 times for each patient, Post-operatively after 12, 24 and 48 h respectively. Finally the data was tabulated and statistically analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests.

Results

Neither the type of file nor the type of sealer affected the post-operative pain, however time showed statistically significant difference between (12 h), (24 h) and (48 h) respectively.

Conclusions

Protaper next versus WaveOne Gold was found to have no influence regarding post-operative pain, The pain intensity showed significant decrease by time in all groups especially after 24 h post-operatively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种内固定技术与两种密封器对根管治疗术后疼痛的影响“随机临床试验”
术后疼痛是根管治疗的主要问题之一,对患者和临床医生来说都是一个不愉快的情况。目的本研究的目的是评估使用两种不同的内固定技术和两种不同的密封剂进行根管治疗后的术后疼痛程度。材料与方法选取下颌第一、第二磨牙84颗,随机分为4组,1组采用Protaper Next制备,AH + Sealer封闭。第2组采用Protaper Next预备磨牙,全充填密封器封闭。第3组使用WaveOne Gold进行磨牙准备,并使用AH Plus Sealer进行封闭;第4组使用WaveOne Gold进行磨牙准备,并使用Total Fill Sealer进行封闭。每例患者术后疼痛评估3次,分别于术后12、24、48 h进行。最后用Kolmogorov-Smirnov和Shapiro-Wilk检验将数据制成表格并进行统计分析。结果文件类型和封口器类型对术后疼痛无影响,但时间差异有统计学意义(12 h)、(24 h)和(48 h)。结论protaper next与WaveOne Gold对术后疼痛无明显影响,且疼痛强度随时间变化均显著降低,尤其是术后24 h后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measuring Accuracy of Dolphin Imaging Software in predicting upper jaw soft tissue profile changes in Class II Adult Patients treated with Extraction versus Non-Extraction Success of Early Childhood Caries After Treatment with Silver Diamine Fluoride Compared to conventional Glass Ionomer Restoration. A Systematic Review Comparison of Alignment Duration Between 0.018” And 0.022” Slot Brackets in Non-Extraction Orthodontic Adult Patients: A Randomized Clinical Study The Efficiency of Passive Ultrasonic Activated Irrigation on the Retrievability of Guttaflow Bioseal : In Vitro Study Radiographic Analysis of Umbrella Technique Combined with Sticky Bone in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1