The regulatory nexus between the promotion of financial education and financial inclusion in enhancing consumer protection in South Africa

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW De Jure Pub Date : 2023-08-14 DOI:10.17159/2225-7160/2023/v56a16
Phemelo Magau
{"title":"The regulatory nexus between the promotion of financial education and financial inclusion in enhancing consumer protection in South Africa","authors":"Phemelo Magau","doi":"10.17159/2225-7160/2023/v56a16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper seeks to share some insights on the regulatory aspects of the promotion of financial education and financial inclusion to enhance consumer protection in South Africa. In recent years, policymakers in different countries, including South Africa, have made various efforts to regulate financial inclusion and integrate financial consumers into the financial sector. Similarly, policymakers and other relevant stakeholders have made efforts to promote financial education to empower financial consumers to make sound financial choices and decisions. Notwithstanding these efforts, the promotion of financial education and financial inclusion has been done in isolation, overlooking the policy synergies between these objectives and/or financial sector outcomes in enhancing consumer protection in South Africa. Given the recent COVID-19 pandemic, both financial education and financial inclusion have become increasingly important policy considerations to negotiate the chasm from the challenges that financial consumers faced before the pandemic and move towards safeguarding the economic interests of financial consumers post-pandemic. Accordingly, this paper explores the interrelationship between the effective promotion of financial education and financial inclusion to enhance consumer protection. Moreover, this paper examines the adequacy of the regulation of financial education and financial inclusion under the National Credit Act 34 of 2005 (NCA); the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 (CPA), the Financial Sector Regulation Act 9 of 201 7 (FSR Act) and the proposed Conduct of Financial Institutions Bill (CoFI Bill) in relation to strengthening consumer protection. Put differently, this article focuses on the regulatory nexus of the promotion of financial education and financial inclusion to enhance consumer protection in South Africa. In the end, this article will provide some recommendations and enforcement approaches that could be incorporated into the regulatory framework of the promotion of financial education and financial inclusion to enhance consumer protection in South Africa.","PeriodicalId":41915,"journal":{"name":"De Jure","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"De Jure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2023/v56a16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper seeks to share some insights on the regulatory aspects of the promotion of financial education and financial inclusion to enhance consumer protection in South Africa. In recent years, policymakers in different countries, including South Africa, have made various efforts to regulate financial inclusion and integrate financial consumers into the financial sector. Similarly, policymakers and other relevant stakeholders have made efforts to promote financial education to empower financial consumers to make sound financial choices and decisions. Notwithstanding these efforts, the promotion of financial education and financial inclusion has been done in isolation, overlooking the policy synergies between these objectives and/or financial sector outcomes in enhancing consumer protection in South Africa. Given the recent COVID-19 pandemic, both financial education and financial inclusion have become increasingly important policy considerations to negotiate the chasm from the challenges that financial consumers faced before the pandemic and move towards safeguarding the economic interests of financial consumers post-pandemic. Accordingly, this paper explores the interrelationship between the effective promotion of financial education and financial inclusion to enhance consumer protection. Moreover, this paper examines the adequacy of the regulation of financial education and financial inclusion under the National Credit Act 34 of 2005 (NCA); the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 (CPA), the Financial Sector Regulation Act 9 of 201 7 (FSR Act) and the proposed Conduct of Financial Institutions Bill (CoFI Bill) in relation to strengthening consumer protection. Put differently, this article focuses on the regulatory nexus of the promotion of financial education and financial inclusion to enhance consumer protection in South Africa. In the end, this article will provide some recommendations and enforcement approaches that could be incorporated into the regulatory framework of the promotion of financial education and financial inclusion to enhance consumer protection in South Africa.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进金融教育与普惠金融在南非加强消费者保护之间的监管关系
本文旨在分享一些关于促进金融教育和金融包容性的监管方面的见解,以加强南非的消费者保护。近年来,包括南非在内的各国政策制定者都做出了各种努力来规范普惠金融,并将金融消费者融入金融部门。同样,政策制定者和其他相关利益相关者也努力促进金融教育,使金融消费者能够做出合理的金融选择和决策。尽管做出了这些努力,但促进金融教育和普惠金融的工作一直是孤立进行的,忽视了这些目标和/或金融部门在加强南非消费者保护方面的成果之间的政策协同作用。在新冠肺炎大流行背景下,金融教育和普惠金融日益成为解决金融消费者在疫情前面临挑战的鸿沟,并在疫情后维护金融消费者经济利益的重要政策考虑因素。据此,本文探讨了有效推进金融教育与普惠金融加强消费者保护之间的相互关系。此外,本文还考察了2005年第34号国家信贷法案(NCA)下金融教育和金融包容性监管的充分性;2008年第68号消费者保护法(CPA), 2017年第9号金融部门监管法(FSR法案)和拟议的金融机构行为法案(CoFI法案)有关加强消费者保护。换句话说,本文关注的是促进金融教育和金融普惠的监管关系,以加强南非的消费者保护。最后,本文将提供一些建议和执行方法,这些建议和方法可以纳入促进金融教育和金融包容性的监管框架,以加强南非的消费者保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
De Jure
De Jure LAW-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Administrative Legal Protection of Persons Who Report Breaches of European Union Law Statute and Powers of the Audit Office The Ex Proprio Motu Principle in the Application of Coercive Administrative Measures by the Labour Inspection Development of Bulgarian Maritime Law, Maritime Administration and Services Provided at Bulgarian Ports (1879 – 1944) On the Opportunity to Impose a Pecuniary Penalty on the Economic Successor of the Infringer of Fair Competition Rules
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1