On null arguments and phi-features in second language acquisition

Q2 Arts and Humanities Journal of Japanese Linguistics Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI:10.1515/jjl-2020-2024
Y. Miyamoto, Kazumi Yamada
{"title":"On null arguments and phi-features in second language acquisition","authors":"Y. Miyamoto, Kazumi Yamada","doi":"10.1515/jjl-2020-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Saito, Mamoru. 2007. Notes on East Asian argument ellipsis. Language Research 43. 203–227 argues that argument ellipsis (AE) is available only in languages that lack phi-feature agreement. Accordingly, Japanese, but not English, permits AE. Under Saito’s theoretical framework, this paper compares experimental data from L1 Japanese learners of L2 English (J-EFL) and L1 English learners of L2 Japanese (E-JFL). Given that sloppy and quantificational reading arises from an ellipsis operation (Hankamer, Jorge & Sag, Ivan. 1976. Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7. 391–426, Takahashi, Daiko. 2008. Noun phrase ellipsis. In Miyagawa, Shigeru & Saito, Mamoru (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Japanese linguistics, 394–422. Oxford: Oxford University Press, among others), we hypothesize that J-EFL learners, but not E-JFL learners, allow the reading in point with null arguments: AE is available only in the grammar of J-EFL learners, forced by the lack of phi-features in their L2 English grammar, due to L1 transfer. The results from our main study adopting a truth value judgement task supported the hypothesis. Based on our finding, we suggest that correct L2 phi-feature specification can ultimately be obtained when no phi-features are present in L1 (Ishino, Nao. 2012. Feature transfer and feature learning in universal grammar: A comparative study of the syntactic mechanism for second language acquisition. Doctoral dissertation: Kwansei Gakuin University, Miyamoto, Yoichi. 2012. Dainigengo-ni okeru hikenzaiteki-na yōso-ni kansuru Ichikōsatsu [A study on null elements in second language acquisition]. Paper presented at the 84th ELSJ annual general meeting: Senshu University, 26 May).","PeriodicalId":36519,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Japanese Linguistics","volume":"83 1","pages":"179 - 223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Japanese Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jjl-2020-2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Saito, Mamoru. 2007. Notes on East Asian argument ellipsis. Language Research 43. 203–227 argues that argument ellipsis (AE) is available only in languages that lack phi-feature agreement. Accordingly, Japanese, but not English, permits AE. Under Saito’s theoretical framework, this paper compares experimental data from L1 Japanese learners of L2 English (J-EFL) and L1 English learners of L2 Japanese (E-JFL). Given that sloppy and quantificational reading arises from an ellipsis operation (Hankamer, Jorge & Sag, Ivan. 1976. Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7. 391–426, Takahashi, Daiko. 2008. Noun phrase ellipsis. In Miyagawa, Shigeru & Saito, Mamoru (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Japanese linguistics, 394–422. Oxford: Oxford University Press, among others), we hypothesize that J-EFL learners, but not E-JFL learners, allow the reading in point with null arguments: AE is available only in the grammar of J-EFL learners, forced by the lack of phi-features in their L2 English grammar, due to L1 transfer. The results from our main study adopting a truth value judgement task supported the hypothesis. Based on our finding, we suggest that correct L2 phi-feature specification can ultimately be obtained when no phi-features are present in L1 (Ishino, Nao. 2012. Feature transfer and feature learning in universal grammar: A comparative study of the syntactic mechanism for second language acquisition. Doctoral dissertation: Kwansei Gakuin University, Miyamoto, Yoichi. 2012. Dainigengo-ni okeru hikenzaiteki-na yōso-ni kansuru Ichikōsatsu [A study on null elements in second language acquisition]. Paper presented at the 84th ELSJ annual general meeting: Senshu University, 26 May).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二语习得中的空参数和phi特征
[摘要]Saito, Mamoru. 2007。关于东亚论点省略的注释。语言研究203-227认为参数省略(AE)仅在缺乏phi-feature一致性的语言中可用。因此,日语允许AE,而英语不允许AE。在Saito的理论框架下,本文比较了母语日语学习者学习第二语言英语(J-EFL)和母语英语学习者学习第二语言日语(E-JFL)的实验数据。考虑到草率和量化的阅读源于省略号操作(Hankamer, Jorge & Sag, Ivan, 1976)。深层和表层的回指。语言探究高桥,大子。2008。名词短语省略。在宫川,Shigeru & Saito, Mamoru(编),日本语言学的牛津手册,394-422。牛津:牛津大学出版社等),我们假设J-EFL学习者,而不是E-JFL学习者,允许用无效参数进行阅读:AE仅在J-EFL学习者的语法中可用,这是由于他们的第二语言语法由于L1迁移而缺乏phii -feature。我们采用真值判断任务的主要研究结果支持了这一假设。基于我们的发现,我们建议当L1中不存在phi特征时,最终可以获得正确的L2 phi特征规范(Ishino, Nao. 2012)。通用语法中的特征迁移与特征学习:二语习得句法机制的比较研究。博士论文:关西学院大学,宫本,Yoichi. 2012。二语习得中的空元素研究yōso-ni kansuru Ichikōsatsu。论文发表于第84届ELSJ年度大会:Senshu大学,5月26日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Japanese Linguistics
Journal of Japanese Linguistics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Female-to-male (FtM) transgender individuals’ multimodal and interactional practices in Japanese Violations of the basic Japanese referential system in reintroductions Asahi, Yoshiyuki, Mayumi Usami, and Fumio Inoue: Handbook of Japanese Sociolinguistics Characteristics of the X ie imperative expression: three criteria for the classification of imperatives Hajime Hoji, Daniel Plesniak, and Yukinori Takubo: The Theory and Practice of Language Faculty Science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1