‘Listen, learn, help’: Parental views on specialist vision impairment provision in the United Kingdom

IF 0.7 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY British Journal of Visual Impairment Pub Date : 2023-03-07 DOI:10.1177/02646196231158923
K. Cummins, J. Hayton
{"title":"‘Listen, learn, help’: Parental views on specialist vision impairment provision in the United Kingdom","authors":"K. Cummins, J. Hayton","doi":"10.1177/02646196231158923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The presence of childhood vision impairment has cascading effects on educational provision and global development across cognitive, physical, and mental health domains. Effective, appropriate, and targeted support in education is legislated across the United Kingdom, influenced by the ‘access to learning, learning to access’ model. Despite reasonable adjustment and specialist provision legislature, anecdotal parental reports suggest inconsistent and insufficient provision culminating in poor physical and mental health outcomes for school-aged children and young people with vision impairment in the United Kingdom. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the perceived effectiveness of provisional arrangement/specialist support from a parental viewpoint. We examined the questionnaire responses of parents/caregivers of children and young people with vision impairment to harness their views regarding provisional entitlement. An online questionnaire was developed in collaboration with parents/caregivers of children with vision impairment who identified a distinct need for research in this field. Forty-six parents/caregivers completed the questionnaire. Most parents reported their child accessing specialised provision; however, frequency of provision and qualification of staff administering provision was inconsistent. Parents reported that available provision more negatively impacted their child’s mental health, and resultingly, most parents lacked confidence in the arrangements their child received. We concluded that parental perception of provisional arrangements is seemingly influenced by the quality of the team supporting their child in educational domains. Future work triangulating parental views with that of the children receiving the support, and support staff, is needed for corroboration.","PeriodicalId":51836,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Visual Impairment","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Visual Impairment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02646196231158923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The presence of childhood vision impairment has cascading effects on educational provision and global development across cognitive, physical, and mental health domains. Effective, appropriate, and targeted support in education is legislated across the United Kingdom, influenced by the ‘access to learning, learning to access’ model. Despite reasonable adjustment and specialist provision legislature, anecdotal parental reports suggest inconsistent and insufficient provision culminating in poor physical and mental health outcomes for school-aged children and young people with vision impairment in the United Kingdom. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the perceived effectiveness of provisional arrangement/specialist support from a parental viewpoint. We examined the questionnaire responses of parents/caregivers of children and young people with vision impairment to harness their views regarding provisional entitlement. An online questionnaire was developed in collaboration with parents/caregivers of children with vision impairment who identified a distinct need for research in this field. Forty-six parents/caregivers completed the questionnaire. Most parents reported their child accessing specialised provision; however, frequency of provision and qualification of staff administering provision was inconsistent. Parents reported that available provision more negatively impacted their child’s mental health, and resultingly, most parents lacked confidence in the arrangements their child received. We concluded that parental perception of provisional arrangements is seemingly influenced by the quality of the team supporting their child in educational domains. Future work triangulating parental views with that of the children receiving the support, and support staff, is needed for corroboration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“倾听、学习、帮助”:英国父母对专业视力障碍服务的看法
儿童视力障碍的存在对认知、身体和心理健康领域的教育提供和全球发展具有级联效应。在"学习的机会,学习的机会"模式的影响下,联合王国各地立法规定了有效、适当和有针对性的教育支助。尽管有合理的调整和专门规定的立法,但坊间父母的报告表明,在联合王国,不一致和不充分的规定最终导致学龄儿童和视力受损青年的身心健康状况不佳。本初步研究旨在从家长的角度评估临时安排/专家支持的有效性。我们调查了视力受损儿童和青少年的父母/照顾者的问卷回答,以了解他们对临时权利的看法。我们与视力受损儿童的父母/照顾者合作,制作了一份在线调查问卷,他们认为在这一领域有明显的研究需求。46名家长/看护人完成了问卷调查。大多数父母报告说,他们的孩子获得了专门服务;但是,提供经费的频率和管理经费的工作人员的资格并不一致。家长们报告说,现有的服务对他们孩子的心理健康产生了更大的负面影响,因此,大多数家长对他们孩子得到的安排缺乏信心。我们的结论是,父母对临时安排的看法似乎受到在教育领域支持他们孩子的团队质量的影响。未来的工作需要将父母的观点与接受支持的儿童和支持人员的观点三角化,以进行确证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊最新文献
Impaired Visuospatial Processing in Cerebral Visual Impairment Revealed by Performance on a Conjunction Visual Search Task. Exploring methodologies for establishing prevalence of deafblindness in children: A scoping review Assessment of level of awareness about children eye diseases and routine eye screening among a sample of Egyptian general population Assessing the impact of auditory media on Braille reading and writing skills: The case of elementary school students who are blind in Sudan External factors and their effect on the learning of English as a foreign language among students with visual impairments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1