The The lost canon. Social theory and social regulation from overturning to mirroring

Onofrio Romano
{"title":"The The lost canon. Social theory and social regulation from overturning to mirroring","authors":"Onofrio Romano","doi":"10.36253/cambio-10487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Facing the hitches of the neoliberal global turn, which first emerged with the 2008 financial crisis, social theory doesn’t appear able to provide an overall critical interpretation of the current regulation pattern and to imagine a different institutional regime, addressing the problems on the ground. This is an unprecedented situation. As we contend, social theory has always glimpsed well in advance the social system crises, assessing at the same time an alternative paradigm, thanks to a sort of canone inverso played against the coeval institutional regime: when a horizontal form of social regulation prevails in a given period, sociology adopts a knowledge paradigm based on the primacy of the vertical social dimensions. And vice-versa. This attitude transcends any conceptual content and mainly concerns the “form” of the theoretical building. In general, social theory opposed both the self-regulating market regime of the nineteenth century, and the following state-centered regime of the twentieth century. Sociology has found its raison d’être in this kind of critical monitoring towards social regulation. What happens today is that the dialectic between social theory and social regulation appears jammed. Evoking the case of the generative social action approach, the article shows that, contrary to the past intellectual seasons, the form of social theory “mirrors” the form of social regulation, instead of overturning it. ","PeriodicalId":41955,"journal":{"name":"Cambio-Rivista sulle Trasformazioni Sociali","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambio-Rivista sulle Trasformazioni Sociali","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/cambio-10487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Facing the hitches of the neoliberal global turn, which first emerged with the 2008 financial crisis, social theory doesn’t appear able to provide an overall critical interpretation of the current regulation pattern and to imagine a different institutional regime, addressing the problems on the ground. This is an unprecedented situation. As we contend, social theory has always glimpsed well in advance the social system crises, assessing at the same time an alternative paradigm, thanks to a sort of canone inverso played against the coeval institutional regime: when a horizontal form of social regulation prevails in a given period, sociology adopts a knowledge paradigm based on the primacy of the vertical social dimensions. And vice-versa. This attitude transcends any conceptual content and mainly concerns the “form” of the theoretical building. In general, social theory opposed both the self-regulating market regime of the nineteenth century, and the following state-centered regime of the twentieth century. Sociology has found its raison d’être in this kind of critical monitoring towards social regulation. What happens today is that the dialectic between social theory and social regulation appears jammed. Evoking the case of the generative social action approach, the article shows that, contrary to the past intellectual seasons, the form of social theory “mirrors” the form of social regulation, instead of overturning it. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
遗失的正典。社会理论与社会规制从颠覆到镜像
面对新自由主义全球转向的困境,它首次出现在2008年的金融危机中,社会理论似乎无法对当前的监管模式提供一个全面的批判性解释,也无法想象一个不同的制度制度,解决实际问题。这是前所未有的情况。正如我们所主张的那样,社会理论总是能很好地预见到社会制度危机,同时评估另一种范式,这要归功于一种与同时期制度制度相反的范式:当一种水平形式的社会监管在特定时期盛行时,社会学采用一种基于垂直社会维度首要地位的知识范式。反之亦然。这种态度超越了任何概念内容,主要关注理论建构的“形式”。总的来说,社会理论既反对十九世纪的自我调节的市场体制,也反对随后二十世纪的以国家为中心的体制。社会学在这种对社会规制的批判性监督中找到了其存在的理由être。今天发生的事情是,社会理论和社会规范之间的辩证法似乎被卡住了。以生成性的社会行动方法为例,本文表明,与过去的思想季节相反,社会理论的形式“反映”了社会调节的形式,而不是推翻它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Youth multidimensional political activism between singularization and mutualism: the case of Up network Benessere epistemico, mass media, disinformazione e cambiamento climatico George Herbert Mead e Norbert Elias. Un dialogo a partire dalle emozioni. La forza trasformativa delle utopie quotidiane. Un’introduzione Itinerari dell’oblio e della memoria. Tra ricostruzione del passato e prospettive per il futuro
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1