Modernism, Inflation and the Gold Standard in T.S. Eliot and Ezra Pound

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Modernist Cultures Pub Date : 2021-07-13 DOI:10.3366/mod.2021.0337
D. Hawkes
{"title":"Modernism, Inflation and the Gold Standard in T.S. Eliot and Ezra Pound","authors":"D. Hawkes","doi":"10.3366/mod.2021.0337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The great inflation of the 1920s had a dramatic effect on Anglophone literary modernism. Ezra Pound, T.S. Eliot and Ernest Hemingway all recognized that financial signs had come unmoored from any objective reference, and their work explores the literary implications of representation's newly autonomous, performative power. Pound blamed the economic and cultural crisis on ‘usury.’ Following Aristotle, he conceived of usury as the unnatural reproduction of autonomous representation, and thus as the antithesis of natural sexual and semiotic fertility. He particularly deplored the historical role played by Samuel Loyd, the Victorian head of Lloyds Bank, who had cunningly manipulated the gold standard in order to give control of the economy to ‘usurers.’ In his financial journalism for Lloyds Bank Monthly, Eliot used the gold standard as an economic logos in order to facilitate usury. Pound saw that Eliot's theory of the ‘objective correlative’ was incompatible with the referential model of representation assumed by the gold standard.","PeriodicalId":41937,"journal":{"name":"Modernist Cultures","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modernist Cultures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/mod.2021.0337","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The great inflation of the 1920s had a dramatic effect on Anglophone literary modernism. Ezra Pound, T.S. Eliot and Ernest Hemingway all recognized that financial signs had come unmoored from any objective reference, and their work explores the literary implications of representation's newly autonomous, performative power. Pound blamed the economic and cultural crisis on ‘usury.’ Following Aristotle, he conceived of usury as the unnatural reproduction of autonomous representation, and thus as the antithesis of natural sexual and semiotic fertility. He particularly deplored the historical role played by Samuel Loyd, the Victorian head of Lloyds Bank, who had cunningly manipulated the gold standard in order to give control of the economy to ‘usurers.’ In his financial journalism for Lloyds Bank Monthly, Eliot used the gold standard as an economic logos in order to facilitate usury. Pound saw that Eliot's theory of the ‘objective correlative’ was incompatible with the referential model of representation assumed by the gold standard.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
艾略特和庞德的现代主义、通货膨胀和金本位
20世纪20年代的通货膨胀对英语文学的现代主义产生了巨大的影响。庞德(Ezra Pound)、艾略特(T.S. Eliot)和海明威(Ernest Hemingway)都认识到,经济迹象已经脱离了任何客观参考,他们的作品探索了再现的新自主、表演力量的文学含义。庞德将经济和文化危机归咎于“高利贷”。继亚里士多德之后,他认为高利贷是自主再现的非自然再生产,因此是自然性和符号学生育的对立面。他特别谴责维多利亚时代劳埃德银行(Lloyds Bank)行长塞缪尔•劳埃德(Samuel lloyd)在历史上所扮演的角色,后者狡猾地操纵金本位,以便将经济控制权交给“高利贷者”。在他为《劳埃德银行月刊》(Lloyds Bank Monthly)撰写的金融新闻中,艾略特将金本位作为一种经济标志,以促进高利贷。庞德看到艾略特的“客观关联”理论与金本位所假定的表征的参照模型是不相容的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Modernist Cultures
Modernist Cultures HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Notes on Contributors Outside Joke: Virginia Woolf’s Freshwater and Coterie Insularity Black lives and peripatetic practice in Sylvia Townsend Warner’s Summer Will Show and David Garnett’s The Sailor’s Return ‘The novel is going to rediscover itself’: Dorothy Richardson, The Freewoman, and Individual Expression Front matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1