Rupture in heritage: strategies of dispossession, elimination and co-resistance

IF 1.1 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Settler Colonial Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-24 DOI:10.1080/2201473X.2021.2019371
Feras Hammami
{"title":"Rupture in heritage: strategies of dispossession, elimination and co-resistance","authors":"Feras Hammami","doi":"10.1080/2201473X.2021.2019371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Diaspora and Israel Jews are increasingly engaging their historical narratives of liberation within new forms of co-resistance to the Israeli Occupation, a history that controversially has been weaponized by the settler colonial power to manifest its dispossessive policies. ‘Occupation is not our Judaism’ has become a political slogan to mobilise Jews against land confiscation, house demolitions, trees uprooting, interrogations, and the Annexation Wall. Activists are concerned about the enactment of violence in the name of Judaism, and seek to contest the establishment of a Jewish nation-state as a solution to antisemitism. Their Jewish identities are articulated on the basis of Israel-centrism, and through intersectional struggles for universal liberation. This article explores the ways in which Jewish historical narratives inform the settler colonial policies in Palestine and the counter activism in which Jews play a potential role. It focuses on the patterns of ‘co-resistance’ which emerged after the collapse of the Oslo Accords of 1993. While co-existence was propagated during the 1990s to reveal the occupier and occupied as two equal sides, co-resistance emerged as a counter narrative in which Jewish and Palestinian activists stand in solidarity against the occupation. Interviews and on-site observations in the Old Town of Hebron showed how heritage and history have been weaponized by settlers to construct Jewish-only enclaves and to destroy the social and spatial realities that signify the collective identity of the Natives. Despite the failure of co-resistance to reverse the settlement project, the interviewed activists saw it as a viable form of resistance to this project. This article explored its potential in dismissing any claim that casts the settler colonial project in Hebron as a natural return of Hebron’s Jews to their history, and to link Nakba to tikkun olam, challenging its exclusion from the moral universe of the Jewish legacies of liberation.","PeriodicalId":46232,"journal":{"name":"Settler Colonial Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Settler Colonial Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2201473X.2021.2019371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Diaspora and Israel Jews are increasingly engaging their historical narratives of liberation within new forms of co-resistance to the Israeli Occupation, a history that controversially has been weaponized by the settler colonial power to manifest its dispossessive policies. ‘Occupation is not our Judaism’ has become a political slogan to mobilise Jews against land confiscation, house demolitions, trees uprooting, interrogations, and the Annexation Wall. Activists are concerned about the enactment of violence in the name of Judaism, and seek to contest the establishment of a Jewish nation-state as a solution to antisemitism. Their Jewish identities are articulated on the basis of Israel-centrism, and through intersectional struggles for universal liberation. This article explores the ways in which Jewish historical narratives inform the settler colonial policies in Palestine and the counter activism in which Jews play a potential role. It focuses on the patterns of ‘co-resistance’ which emerged after the collapse of the Oslo Accords of 1993. While co-existence was propagated during the 1990s to reveal the occupier and occupied as two equal sides, co-resistance emerged as a counter narrative in which Jewish and Palestinian activists stand in solidarity against the occupation. Interviews and on-site observations in the Old Town of Hebron showed how heritage and history have been weaponized by settlers to construct Jewish-only enclaves and to destroy the social and spatial realities that signify the collective identity of the Natives. Despite the failure of co-resistance to reverse the settlement project, the interviewed activists saw it as a viable form of resistance to this project. This article explored its potential in dismissing any claim that casts the settler colonial project in Hebron as a natural return of Hebron’s Jews to their history, and to link Nakba to tikkun olam, challenging its exclusion from the moral universe of the Jewish legacies of liberation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
遗产的断裂:剥夺、消除和共同抵抗的策略
流散的犹太人和以色列犹太人越来越多地将他们的解放历史叙述融入到共同抵抗以色列占领的新形式中,以色列占领是一段有争议的历史,被定居者殖民势力用作武器,以体现其剥夺政策。“占领不是我们的犹太教”已经成为动员犹太人反对没收土地、拆毁房屋、连根拔起树木、审讯和修建吞并墙的政治口号。活动人士担心以犹太教的名义实施暴力,并试图对建立犹太民族国家作为解决反犹主义的办法提出质疑。他们的犹太人身份是在以色列中心主义的基础上,通过为普遍解放而进行的交叉斗争而明确表达的。本文探讨了犹太历史叙事如何影响巴勒斯坦定居者的殖民政策,以及犹太人在其中发挥潜在作用的反激进主义。它着重于1993年《奥斯陆协定》崩溃后出现的“共同抵抗”模式。虽然共存在20世纪90年代得到宣传,表明占领者和被占领者是平等的双方,但共同抵抗作为一种反叙事出现,其中犹太人和巴勒斯坦活动家团结起来反对占领。在希伯伦老城的采访和现场观察表明,定居者如何将遗产和历史用作武器,以建造只属于犹太人的飞地,并摧毁象征土著集体身份的社会和空间现实。尽管联合抵抗未能扭转定居点项目,但受访的活动人士认为这是一种可行的抵抗方式。本文探讨了它的潜力,驳斥了任何将希伯伦的定居者殖民项目视为希伯伦犹太人对其历史的自然回归的说法,并将Nakba与tikkun olam联系起来,挑战将其排除在犹太解放遗产的道德世界之外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Settler Colonial Studies
Settler Colonial Studies SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: The journal aims to establish settler colonial studies as a distinct field of scholarly research. Scholars and students will find and contribute to historically-oriented research and analyses covering contemporary issues. We also aim to present multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research, involving areas like history, law, genocide studies, indigenous, colonial and postcolonial studies, anthropology, historical geography, economics, politics, sociology, international relations, political science, literary criticism, cultural and gender studies and philosophy.
期刊最新文献
Following the yellowcake road: exploring the colonial roots and routes of Australian radioactive minerals, 1900s–1950s ‘Legal fictions and settler colonialism: the case of the Defence (Emergency) Regulations, 1945 in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories’ Germany’s anti-antisemitic complex and the question of settler colonialism From Lady Jane Franklin to #TradWife: gender, race, and class in colonial complicity in the North American High North Whānau wellbeing: reclaiming precolonial Māori perspectives of men, fathers and parenting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1