Risk-Based Business License and Problems Arising After The Job Creation ACT

Jurnal IUS Pub Date : 2022-08-23 DOI:10.29303/ius.v10i2.1082
H. Hariyanto
{"title":"Risk-Based Business License and Problems Arising After The Job Creation ACT","authors":"H. Hariyanto","doi":"10.29303/ius.v10i2.1082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The emergence of the Job Creation Act, one of the aims of creating employment opportunities. In general, the administrative licensing process in Indonesia is a barrier to business transformation. Many licensing processes do not have clear protocols, demanding, lack transparency, and costly. So that the fundamental transformation in the Job Creation Law is the transformation of the business licensing paradigm in Indonesia. Switch from the traditional license-based licensing approach to risk-based licensing. This research aims to reveal how risk-based licensing actually is and what problems can arise in licensing when risk-based licensing is applied. This is a doctrinal study that takes a conceptual and legal approach. The analysis is in the form of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The data and materials collected were analyzed qualitatively and described by descriptive analysis. This paper concludes that risk-based licensing relies more on a thorough risk analysis. In the implementation of risk-based licensing, the regulator assesses several factors such as business activities, business performance history, and the risk management system in place. Based on these matters, the regulator then places business actors into several groups, according to the level of risk. Risk-based licensing, on the other hand, has a couple of problems. The first issue is ambiguous risk assessment as a result of the omnibus legislative format. Second, the volatile risk hasn’t been taken into account. Third, neither cumulative nor systemic risks have been taken into account. Fourth, there are unanticipated implementation challenges. Finally, there is the possibility of regulatory capture.","PeriodicalId":34628,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal IUS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal IUS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v10i2.1082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The emergence of the Job Creation Act, one of the aims of creating employment opportunities. In general, the administrative licensing process in Indonesia is a barrier to business transformation. Many licensing processes do not have clear protocols, demanding, lack transparency, and costly. So that the fundamental transformation in the Job Creation Law is the transformation of the business licensing paradigm in Indonesia. Switch from the traditional license-based licensing approach to risk-based licensing. This research aims to reveal how risk-based licensing actually is and what problems can arise in licensing when risk-based licensing is applied. This is a doctrinal study that takes a conceptual and legal approach. The analysis is in the form of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The data and materials collected were analyzed qualitatively and described by descriptive analysis. This paper concludes that risk-based licensing relies more on a thorough risk analysis. In the implementation of risk-based licensing, the regulator assesses several factors such as business activities, business performance history, and the risk management system in place. Based on these matters, the regulator then places business actors into several groups, according to the level of risk. Risk-based licensing, on the other hand, has a couple of problems. The first issue is ambiguous risk assessment as a result of the omnibus legislative format. Second, the volatile risk hasn’t been taken into account. Third, neither cumulative nor systemic risks have been taken into account. Fourth, there are unanticipated implementation challenges. Finally, there is the possibility of regulatory capture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于风险的营业执照及《创造就业法案》后出现的问题
《创造就业法案》的出现,是创造就业机会的目标之一。总的来说,印尼的行政许可程序是企业转型的障碍。许多许可程序没有明确的协议,要求苛刻,缺乏透明度,而且成本高昂。所以就业创造法的根本转变是印尼商业许可模式的转变。从传统的基于许可的许可方法切换到基于风险的许可方法。本研究旨在揭示基于风险的许可实际上是什么,以及在应用基于风险的许可时可能出现的问题。这是一项理论研究,采用概念和法律方法。分析是在一级,二级和三级法律材料的形式。对收集到的数据和资料进行定性分析,并采用描述性分析进行描述。本文的结论是,基于风险的许可更依赖于彻底的风险分析。在实施基于风险的发牌时,监管机构会评估若干因素,例如业务活动、业务业绩历史和风险管理系统。在这些问题的基础上,监管机构根据风险水平将业务参与者分成几个组。另一方面,基于风险的许可存在一些问题。第一个问题是由于综合立法形式造成的模棱两可的风险评估。其次,波动性风险没有考虑进去。第三,既没有考虑累积风险,也没有考虑系统性风险。第四,存在未预料到的执行挑战。最后,还有监管俘获的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
ISPO Policy on Palm Oil Industry and Biodiesel Development in North Aceh Guidance Concept for Convicts in Penitentiary as Legal Means to Minimize Narcotics Abuse Maximum Limitation of Fines for Economic Crimes In Law Number 1 of 2023 The Future of Sex Robots in Indonesia: Law, Science, And Technology Pancasila's Economic Existence in Business Development: The Efforts to Realize Justice in Business Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1