Anabolic androgenic steroid use population size estimation: a first stage study utilising a Delphi exercise

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy Pub Date : 2022-05-15 DOI:10.1080/09687637.2022.2070058
V. Hope, Vincent Walker Bond, I. Boardley, Josie Smith, John Campbell, G. Bates, R. Ralphs, M. Van Hout, J. McVeigh
{"title":"Anabolic androgenic steroid use population size estimation: a first stage study utilising a Delphi exercise","authors":"V. Hope, Vincent Walker Bond, I. Boardley, Josie Smith, John Campbell, G. Bates, R. Ralphs, M. Van Hout, J. McVeigh","doi":"10.1080/09687637.2022.2070058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Harms associated with anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS) use are well-established and a public health concern. Robust estimates of the numbers using AAS are needed to inform responses, however, in the UK these are lacking. Due to the comparative rarity and associated stigma, general population surveys are problematic and data availability limits the use of indirect approaches. To address this, the Delphi method was used to refine the key parameters needed for indirect estimation from attendances at needle and syringe programmes (NSP) for AAS use. An expert panel (n = 63) was surveyed three times (n = 40, 39, and 37) to refine the parameters needed to generate a likely range from data on NSP attendances. A broad agreement was reached on: regional variations in use; the proportion of men using AAS who only use them orally; the proportion of men who inject AAS using NSP; and the proportion of the AAS population who are women. We conclude that previous general population survey-based estimates of recent AAS use appear implausible, with the likely range indicated by NSP data being up to 10-times higher. AAS use in the UK is more common than previously indicated, but further work is needed to refine population size estimation and characteristics.","PeriodicalId":11367,"journal":{"name":"Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy","volume":"32 1","pages":"461 - 473"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09687637.2022.2070058","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Abstract Harms associated with anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS) use are well-established and a public health concern. Robust estimates of the numbers using AAS are needed to inform responses, however, in the UK these are lacking. Due to the comparative rarity and associated stigma, general population surveys are problematic and data availability limits the use of indirect approaches. To address this, the Delphi method was used to refine the key parameters needed for indirect estimation from attendances at needle and syringe programmes (NSP) for AAS use. An expert panel (n = 63) was surveyed three times (n = 40, 39, and 37) to refine the parameters needed to generate a likely range from data on NSP attendances. A broad agreement was reached on: regional variations in use; the proportion of men using AAS who only use them orally; the proportion of men who inject AAS using NSP; and the proportion of the AAS population who are women. We conclude that previous general population survey-based estimates of recent AAS use appear implausible, with the likely range indicated by NSP data being up to 10-times higher. AAS use in the UK is more common than previously indicated, but further work is needed to refine population size estimation and characteristics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合成代谢雄激素类固醇使用人群规模估计:利用德尔菲练习的第一阶段研究
与合成代谢雄激素类固醇(AAS)使用相关的危害是公认的,也是一个公共卫生问题。需要对使用AAS的人数进行可靠的估计,以便为响应提供信息,然而,在英国,这些估计是缺乏的。由于相对罕见和相关的耻辱,一般人口调查是有问题的,数据的可用性限制了间接方法的使用。为了解决这一问题,采用德尔菲法对间接估计AAS使用的针头和注射器计划(NSP)的出席人数所需的关键参数进行了细化。一个专家小组(n = 63)进行了三次调查(n = 40,39和37),以完善所需的参数,从NSP出席率的数据中产生一个可能的范围。会议就以下问题达成了广泛共识:使用的地区差异;仅口服AAS的男性比例;使用NSP注射AAS的男性比例;以及AAS人口中女性的比例。我们得出的结论是,以前基于一般人口调查的对最近AAS使用的估计似乎是不可信的,NSP数据显示的可能范围高达10倍。AAS在英国的使用比以前指出的更普遍,但需要进一步的工作来完善人口规模估计和特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Drugs: education, prevention & policy is a refereed journal which aims to provide a forum for communication and debate between policy makers, practitioners and researchers concerned with social and health policy responses to legal and illicit drug use and drug-related harm. The journal publishes multi-disciplinary research papers, commentaries and reviews on policy, prevention and harm reduction issues regarding the use and misuse of alcohol, tobacco and other drugs. It is journal policy to encourage submissions which reflect different cultural, historical and theoretical approaches to the development of policy and practice.
期刊最新文献
Neither laissez-faire nor prohibition: the khat regulation policy preferences of people who chew khat and local social service providers in Ethiopia From subcultural to mainstream? The evolving meaning of cannabis use among youth in a restrictive policy context Reviewing the anti-doping policy of India: Missing the wood for the trees? Just have this come from their prescription pad: the medicalization of safer supply from the perspectives of health planners in BC, Canada “Availability is the poor cousin of marketing and pricing”: qualitative study of stakeholders’ views on policy priorities around tobacco and alcohol availability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1