Normative appraisals of faith in God

IF 0.5 2区 哲学 0 RELIGION RELIGIOUS STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-08-07 DOI:10.1017/S0034412523000367
Daniel J. McKaughan, Daniel Howard-Snyder
{"title":"Normative appraisals of faith in God","authors":"Daniel J. McKaughan, Daniel Howard-Snyder","doi":"10.1017/S0034412523000367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many theistic religions place a high value on faith in God and some traditions regard it as a virtue. However, philosophers commonly assign either very little value to faith in God or significant negative value, or even view it as a vice. Progress in assessing whether and when faith in God can be valuable or disvaluable, virtuous or vicious, rational or irrational, or otherwise apt or inapt requires understanding what faith in God is. This Special Issue on the normative appraisal of faith in God for Religious Studies includes nine articles, from a diverse range of perspectives, which explore issues related to the core questions ‘What is faith in God?’ and ‘What normative questions about faith in God need to be addressed?’ In this Introduction, we briefly introduce each article. In his contribution, ‘Reasonable Faith and Reasonable Fideism’, John Bishop approaches the question ‘What is faith in God?’ by taking what he calls ‘Christian faith in God’ as a paradigm case of the phenomenon of interest. He aims to specify its ‘nature’, what’s ‘essential’ to it. The official formulation of his theory goes as follows:","PeriodicalId":45888,"journal":{"name":"RELIGIOUS STUDIES","volume":"105 1","pages":"383 - 393"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RELIGIOUS STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1095","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412523000367","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many theistic religions place a high value on faith in God and some traditions regard it as a virtue. However, philosophers commonly assign either very little value to faith in God or significant negative value, or even view it as a vice. Progress in assessing whether and when faith in God can be valuable or disvaluable, virtuous or vicious, rational or irrational, or otherwise apt or inapt requires understanding what faith in God is. This Special Issue on the normative appraisal of faith in God for Religious Studies includes nine articles, from a diverse range of perspectives, which explore issues related to the core questions ‘What is faith in God?’ and ‘What normative questions about faith in God need to be addressed?’ In this Introduction, we briefly introduce each article. In his contribution, ‘Reasonable Faith and Reasonable Fideism’, John Bishop approaches the question ‘What is faith in God?’ by taking what he calls ‘Christian faith in God’ as a paradigm case of the phenomenon of interest. He aims to specify its ‘nature’, what’s ‘essential’ to it. The official formulation of his theory goes as follows:
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对上帝信仰的规范性评价
许多有神论宗教高度重视对上帝的信仰,一些传统认为这是一种美德。然而,哲学家们通常认为,对上帝的信仰要么价值很低,要么有很大的负面价值,甚至认为它是一种恶习。在评估对上帝的信仰是否有价值,何时有价值,善良或邪恶,理性或非理性,或其他适宜或不适宜的过程中,需要了解对上帝的信仰是什么。本期《宗教研究对上帝信仰的规范评价》特刊包括九篇文章,从不同的角度探讨了与“什么是对上帝的信仰?”和“关于对上帝的信仰有哪些规范问题需要解决?”在这篇引言中,我们简要介绍了每一篇文章。在他的著作《合理信仰与合理信仰主义》中,约翰·毕晓普探讨了“什么是对上帝的信仰?”他把所谓的"基督教对上帝的信仰"作为兴趣现象的范例。他的目的是明确它的“本质”,什么是它的“本质”。他的理论的官方表述如下:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
RELIGIOUS STUDIES
RELIGIOUS STUDIES RELIGION-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Religious Studies is an international journal devoted to the problems of the philosophy of religion as they arise out of classical and contemporary discussions and from varied religious traditions. More than 25 articles are published each year, and the journal also contains an extensive book review section.
期刊最新文献
One goodness, many goodnesses, and the Divine Ideas Imitation Theory Divine contradiction: fascinating but unpersuasive Divine Contradiction: some snippets Divine Contradiction: replies to critics Divine command theory and the (supposed) incoherence of self-commanding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1