Making use of survival analysis to indirectly model loss given default

ORiON Pub Date : 2019-01-14 DOI:10.5784/34-2-588
Morné Joubert, T. Verster, H. Raubenheimer
{"title":"Making use of survival analysis to indirectly model loss given default","authors":"Morné Joubert, T. Verster, H. Raubenheimer","doi":"10.5784/34-2-588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A direct or indirect modelling methodology can be used to predict Loss Given Default (LGD). When using the indirect LGD methodology, two components exist, namely, the loss severity component and the probability component. Commonly used models to predict the loss severity and the probability component are the haircut- and the logistic regression models, respectively. In this article, survival analysis was proposed as an improvement to the more traditional logistic regression method. The mean squared error, bias and variance for the two methodologies were compared and it was shown that the use of survival analysis enhanced the model's predictive power. The proposed LGD methodology (using survival analysis) was applied on two simulated datasets and two retail bank datasets, and according to the results obtained it outperformed the logistic regression LGD methodology. Additional benefits included that the new methodology could allow for censoring as well as predicting probabilities over varying outcome periods.","PeriodicalId":30587,"journal":{"name":"ORiON","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORiON","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5784/34-2-588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

A direct or indirect modelling methodology can be used to predict Loss Given Default (LGD). When using the indirect LGD methodology, two components exist, namely, the loss severity component and the probability component. Commonly used models to predict the loss severity and the probability component are the haircut- and the logistic regression models, respectively. In this article, survival analysis was proposed as an improvement to the more traditional logistic regression method. The mean squared error, bias and variance for the two methodologies were compared and it was shown that the use of survival analysis enhanced the model's predictive power. The proposed LGD methodology (using survival analysis) was applied on two simulated datasets and two retail bank datasets, and according to the results obtained it outperformed the logistic regression LGD methodology. Additional benefits included that the new methodology could allow for censoring as well as predicting probabilities over varying outcome periods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用生存分析来间接模拟给定违约情况下的损失
直接或间接建模方法可用于预测违约损失(LGD)。在使用间接LGD方法时,存在两个分量,即损失严重性分量和概率分量。预测损失严重程度和概率成分的常用模型分别是剪发回归模型和逻辑回归模型。本文提出了生存分析,作为对传统逻辑回归方法的改进。比较了两种方法的均方误差、偏倚和方差,结果表明,使用生存分析增强了模型的预测能力。将提出的LGD方法(使用生存分析)应用于两个模拟数据集和两个零售银行数据集,根据获得的结果,它优于逻辑回归LGD方法。额外的好处包括,新的方法可以允许审查和预测不同结果期间的概率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Route overlap metrics to batch orders Anomaly detection using autoencoders with network analysis features On the calibration of stochastic volatility models to estimate the real-world measure used in option pricing Celebrating 50-years of OR in South Africa – a Bibliometric Analysis of contributions to International OR Literature Comments: Development of an early career academic supervisor in Statistics - a discussion on a guiding rubric
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1