Nurses' perception, knowledge, and use of neonatal pain assessment

Martina Carlsen Misic, R. D. Andersen, Sofia Strand, M. Eriksson, Emma Olsson
{"title":"Nurses' perception, knowledge, and use of neonatal pain assessment","authors":"Martina Carlsen Misic, R. D. Andersen, Sofia Strand, M. Eriksson, Emma Olsson","doi":"10.1002/pne2.12050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Preterm and sick newborn infants undergo several painful procedures during their hospital stay, potentially leading to short‐ and long‐term negative consequences. Pain assessment should be performed regularly to provide optimal pain management. Nurses' knowledge of and attitude toward neonatal pain assessment affect how pain is assessed and managed in the clinical situation. The aim of this study was to explore Swedish nurses' perception, knowledge, and use of neonatal pain assessment. This descriptive, cross‐sectional questionnaire study was conducted across all Swedish neonatal units (n = 38). Respondents were chosen through convenience sampling by the head nurses at each unit. Ten nurses from each unit were asked to complete the survey, which contained both closed and open questions. A majority of the units (30/38; 79%) participated and 232 surveys were returned, a response rate of 61%. Of the nurses, 91% thought that neonatal pain assessment was important. Many nurses mentioned various difficulties with pain assessment and concerns that the scales used might not assess pain correctly. About half of the nurses considered themselves to have enough knowledge of neonatal pain assessment. Those who reported having enough knowledge of pain assessment viewed the pain scales used at their units more positively. Of the nurses, 74% reported using a pain assessment scale several times per work shift. Pain management guidelines were available according to 75% of nurses, but only 53% reported that the guidelines were followed. Although nurses in general expressed a positive attitude toward pain assessment scales, this was not necessarily evident in their clinical practice. Lack of knowledge, available or accessible guidelines, or concerns regarding the validity of available pain scales seemed to limit their use.","PeriodicalId":19634,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric & Neonatal Pain","volume":"25 1","pages":"59 - 65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric & Neonatal Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pne2.12050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Preterm and sick newborn infants undergo several painful procedures during their hospital stay, potentially leading to short‐ and long‐term negative consequences. Pain assessment should be performed regularly to provide optimal pain management. Nurses' knowledge of and attitude toward neonatal pain assessment affect how pain is assessed and managed in the clinical situation. The aim of this study was to explore Swedish nurses' perception, knowledge, and use of neonatal pain assessment. This descriptive, cross‐sectional questionnaire study was conducted across all Swedish neonatal units (n = 38). Respondents were chosen through convenience sampling by the head nurses at each unit. Ten nurses from each unit were asked to complete the survey, which contained both closed and open questions. A majority of the units (30/38; 79%) participated and 232 surveys were returned, a response rate of 61%. Of the nurses, 91% thought that neonatal pain assessment was important. Many nurses mentioned various difficulties with pain assessment and concerns that the scales used might not assess pain correctly. About half of the nurses considered themselves to have enough knowledge of neonatal pain assessment. Those who reported having enough knowledge of pain assessment viewed the pain scales used at their units more positively. Of the nurses, 74% reported using a pain assessment scale several times per work shift. Pain management guidelines were available according to 75% of nurses, but only 53% reported that the guidelines were followed. Although nurses in general expressed a positive attitude toward pain assessment scales, this was not necessarily evident in their clinical practice. Lack of knowledge, available or accessible guidelines, or concerns regarding the validity of available pain scales seemed to limit their use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护士对新生儿疼痛评估的认知、知识和使用
早产儿和生病的新生儿在住院期间经历了几个痛苦的过程,可能导致短期和长期的负面后果。疼痛评估应定期进行,以提供最佳的疼痛管理。护士对新生儿疼痛评估的知识和态度影响临床对疼痛的评估和处理。本研究的目的是探讨瑞典护士对新生儿疼痛评估的认知、知识和使用。这项描述性、横断面问卷调查研究在瑞典所有新生儿单位进行(n = 38)。调查对象由各科室护士长通过方便抽样的方式抽取。每个单位的10名护士被要求完成调查,其中包括封闭式和开放式问题。大多数单位(30/38;79%)参与,并回复了232份调查,回复率为61%。91%的护士认为新生儿疼痛评估很重要。许多护士提到了疼痛评估的各种困难,并担心使用的量表可能无法正确评估疼痛。大约一半的护士认为自己对新生儿疼痛评估有足够的了解。那些报告有足够的疼痛评估知识的人更积极地看待他们单位使用的疼痛量表。在护士中,74%的人报告每个轮班使用疼痛评估量表几次。75%的护士有疼痛管理指南,但只有53%的护士报告说他们遵守了这些指南。虽然护士普遍对疼痛评估量表持积极态度,但这在临床实践中并不一定明显。缺乏知识、可用或可获得的指南,或对可用疼痛量表有效性的担忧似乎限制了它们的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perceived distress due to nasopharyngeal swab collection: Correspondence. "You just want someone to help": Outcomes that matter to parents when their child is treated for chronic pain. Prevalence of chronic pain in children and adolescents with psychiatric conditions. Positive effects of a child-centered intervention on children's fear and pain during needle procedures. Overview of radiotherapy-induced chronic pain in childhood cancer survivors: A narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1