Re-interventions following appendectomy in children: a multicenter study.

M. D. Blanco Verdú, D. P. Peláez Mata, A. Gómez Sánchez, A. Costa I Roig, E. Carazo Palacios, S. Proano, I. Diéguez Hernández-Vaquero, J. Ordóñez Pereira, M. Fanjul Gómez, R. Morante Valverde, I. Cano Novillo, J. V. Vila Carbó, J. C. de Agustín Asencio
{"title":"Re-interventions following appendectomy in children: a multicenter study.","authors":"M. D. Blanco Verdú, D. P. Peláez Mata, A. Gómez Sánchez, A. Costa I Roig, E. Carazo Palacios, S. Proano, I. Diéguez Hernández-Vaquero, J. Ordóñez Pereira, M. Fanjul Gómez, R. Morante Valverde, I. Cano Novillo, J. V. Vila Carbó, J. C. de Agustín Asencio","doi":"10.54847/cp.2022.02.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nAcute appendicitis is the most frequent cause of acute abdomen in children. The objective of this study was to analyze the causes, approach, and results of complications requiring surgery following appendectomy.\n\n\nMATERIAL AND METHODS\nA retrospective study of the appendectomies conducted in three third-level institutions from 2015 to 2019 was carried out. Complications, causes, and number of re-interventions, time from one surgery to another, surgical technique used, operative findings at baseline appendectomy according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) classification, and hospital stay were collected.\n\n\nRESULTS\n3,698 appendicitis cases underwent surgery, 76.7% of which laparoscopically, with 37.2% being advanced (grades II-V of the AAST classification). Mean operating time was 50.4 minutes (49.8 ± 20.1 for laparoscopy vs. 49.9 ± 20.1 for open surgery, p > 0.05), and longer in patients requiring re-intervention (68.6 ± 27.2 vs. 49.1 ± 19.3, p < 0.001). 76 re-interventions (2.05%) were carried out. The causes included postoperative infection (n = 46), intestinal obstruction (n = 20), dehiscence (n = 4), and others (n = 6). Re-intervention risk was not impacted by the baseline approach used (open surgery or laparoscopy, OR: 1.044, 95% CI: 0.57-1.9), but it was by appendicitis progression (7.8% advanced vs. 0.7% incipient, OR: 12.52, 95% CI: 6.18-25.3). There was a tendency to use the same approach both at baseline appendectomy and re-intervention. This occurred in 72.2% of laparoscopic appendectomies, and in 67.7% of open appendectomies. The minimally invasive approach (50/76) was more frequent than the open one (27 laparoscopies and 23 ultrasound-guided drainages vs. 26 open surgeries) (p < 0.05). 55% of obstruction patients underwent re-intervention through open surgery (p > 0.05).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nRe-intervention rate was higher in advanced appendicitis cases. In this series, the minimally invasive approach (laparoscopic or ultrasound-guided drainage) was the technique of choice for re-interventions.","PeriodicalId":10316,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia pediatrica : organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Cirugia Pediatrica","volume":"109 1","pages":"70-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia pediatrica : organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Cirugia Pediatrica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54847/cp.2022.02.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Acute appendicitis is the most frequent cause of acute abdomen in children. The objective of this study was to analyze the causes, approach, and results of complications requiring surgery following appendectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective study of the appendectomies conducted in three third-level institutions from 2015 to 2019 was carried out. Complications, causes, and number of re-interventions, time from one surgery to another, surgical technique used, operative findings at baseline appendectomy according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) classification, and hospital stay were collected. RESULTS 3,698 appendicitis cases underwent surgery, 76.7% of which laparoscopically, with 37.2% being advanced (grades II-V of the AAST classification). Mean operating time was 50.4 minutes (49.8 ± 20.1 for laparoscopy vs. 49.9 ± 20.1 for open surgery, p > 0.05), and longer in patients requiring re-intervention (68.6 ± 27.2 vs. 49.1 ± 19.3, p < 0.001). 76 re-interventions (2.05%) were carried out. The causes included postoperative infection (n = 46), intestinal obstruction (n = 20), dehiscence (n = 4), and others (n = 6). Re-intervention risk was not impacted by the baseline approach used (open surgery or laparoscopy, OR: 1.044, 95% CI: 0.57-1.9), but it was by appendicitis progression (7.8% advanced vs. 0.7% incipient, OR: 12.52, 95% CI: 6.18-25.3). There was a tendency to use the same approach both at baseline appendectomy and re-intervention. This occurred in 72.2% of laparoscopic appendectomies, and in 67.7% of open appendectomies. The minimally invasive approach (50/76) was more frequent than the open one (27 laparoscopies and 23 ultrasound-guided drainages vs. 26 open surgeries) (p < 0.05). 55% of obstruction patients underwent re-intervention through open surgery (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION Re-intervention rate was higher in advanced appendicitis cases. In this series, the minimally invasive approach (laparoscopic or ultrasound-guided drainage) was the technique of choice for re-interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童阑尾切除术后的再干预:一项多中心研究。
急性阑尾炎是儿童急腹症最常见的病因。本研究的目的是分析阑尾切除术后需要手术的并发症的原因、方法和结果。材料与方法回顾性分析2015 - 2019年3家三级医院阑尾切除术患者的临床资料。收集并发症、原因、再干预次数、从一次手术到另一次手术的时间、使用的手术技术、根据美国创伤外科协会(AAST)分类的阑尾切除术基线手术结果和住院时间。结果3698例阑尾炎患者行手术治疗,其中腹腔镜手术占76.7%,晚期37.2% (AAST分级ii ~ v级)。平均手术时间为50.4分钟(腹腔镜为49.8±20.1分钟,开放手术为49.9±20.1分钟,p > 0.05),需要再次干预的患者平均手术时间更长(68.6±27.2分钟,49.1±19.3分钟,p < 0.001)。再干预76例(2.05%)。原因包括术后感染(n = 46)、肠梗阻(n = 20)、裂开(n = 4)和其他(n = 6)。再干预风险不受所采用的基线入路(开放手术或腹腔镜,or: 1.044, 95% CI: 0.57-1.9)的影响,但受阑尾炎进展的影响(晚期7.8% vs初发0.7%,or: 12.52, 95% CI: 6.18-25.3)。基线阑尾切除术和再次介入手术均倾向于使用相同的入路。72.2%的腹腔镜阑尾切除术和67.7%的开放式阑尾切除术出现了这种情况。微创入路发生率(50/76)高于开放入路(27例,超声引导下引流23例,开放26例)(p < 0.05)。55%的梗阻患者通过开放手术再次介入治疗(p > 0.05)。结论晚期阑尾炎患者再干预率较高。在这个系列中,微创方法(腹腔镜或超声引导引流)是再干预的首选技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
期刊最新文献
Non-syndromic Hirschsprung's disease as a result of a RET gene variant. Complications after Nuss bar removal procedure for pectus excavatum. Analysis and proposal of a safety protocol. Spanish primary care in pediatric trauma (AITP) consensus: An AITP checklist. Intestinal obstruction as a result of intra-abdominal hematoma: a complication of low molecular weight heparin in pediatric patients. Experimental necrotizing enterocolitis using oral lipopolysaccharide and protective role of breastmilk.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1