A Rare Moment of Cross-Partisan Consensus: Elite and Public Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Canada

Eric Merkley, Aengus Bridgman, P. Loewen, Taylor Owen, D. Ruths, Oleg Zhilin
{"title":"A Rare Moment of Cross-Partisan Consensus: Elite and Public Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Canada","authors":"Eric Merkley, Aengus Bridgman, P. Loewen, Taylor Owen, D. Ruths, Oleg Zhilin","doi":"10.1017/S0008423920000311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic requires an effort to coordinate the actions of government and society in a way unmatched in recent history. Individual citizens need to voluntarily sacrifice economic and social activity for an indefinite period of time to protect others. At the same time, we know that public opinion tends to become polarized on highly salient issues, except when political elites are in consensus (Berinsky, 2009; Zaller, 1992). Avoiding elite and public polarization is thus essential for an effective societal response to the pandemic. In the United States, there appears to be elite and public polarization on the severity of the pandemic (Gadarian et al., 2020). Other evidence suggests that polarization is undermining compliance with social distancing (Cornelson and Miloucheva, 2020). Using a multimethod approach, we show that Canadian political elites and the public are in a unique period of cross-partisan consensus on important questions related to the COVID-19 pandemic, such as its seriousness and the necessity of social distancing.","PeriodicalId":47302,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Political Science-Revue Canadienne De Science Politique","volume":"51 1","pages":"1 - 8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"129","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Political Science-Revue Canadienne De Science Politique","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423920000311","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 129

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic requires an effort to coordinate the actions of government and society in a way unmatched in recent history. Individual citizens need to voluntarily sacrifice economic and social activity for an indefinite period of time to protect others. At the same time, we know that public opinion tends to become polarized on highly salient issues, except when political elites are in consensus (Berinsky, 2009; Zaller, 1992). Avoiding elite and public polarization is thus essential for an effective societal response to the pandemic. In the United States, there appears to be elite and public polarization on the severity of the pandemic (Gadarian et al., 2020). Other evidence suggests that polarization is undermining compliance with social distancing (Cornelson and Miloucheva, 2020). Using a multimethod approach, we show that Canadian political elites and the public are in a unique period of cross-partisan consensus on important questions related to the COVID-19 pandemic, such as its seriousness and the necessity of social distancing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨党派共识的罕见时刻:精英和公众对加拿大COVID-19大流行的反应
COVID-19大流行需要以近代历史上无与伦比的方式协调政府和社会的行动。为了保护他人,公民个人需要自愿无限期地牺牲经济和社会活动。与此同时,我们知道,除非政治精英达成共识,否则公众舆论往往会在高度突出的问题上变得两极分化(Berinsky, 2009;Zaller, 1992)。因此,避免精英和公众两极分化对于有效应对这一流行病至关重要。在美国,精英和公众对疫情严重程度的看法似乎两极分化(Gadarian et al., 2020)。其他证据表明,两极分化正在破坏对社交距离的遵守(Cornelson和Miloucheva, 2020)。通过多种方法,我们表明,加拿大政治精英和公众正处于一个独特的时期,在与COVID-19大流行相关的重要问题上,如其严重性和保持社交距离的必要性,两党达成了共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: This journal provides original research articles, notes, commentaries, review articles, and book reviews in all areas of political science, including but not limited to: the history of political thought; contemporary political theory; international relations and foreign policy; governmental institutions and processes; political behaviour; public administration and public policy; and women and politics. In addition, the Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique is the primary forum for innovative research on all facets of Canadian politics and government as well as the principal outlet for Canadian political science scholarship. Submissions are accepted in English and in French.
期刊最新文献
#Propage l'info, pas le virus : communication politique et réponses des influenceur.euses à l'appel du gouvernement Legault lors de la crise de la COVID-19 au Québec Out of an Abundance of Caution: COVID-19 and Health Risk Frames in Canadian News Media Twitter Followers of Canadian Political and Health Authorities during the COVID-19 Pandemic: What Are Their Activity and Interests? The Partisan Impact on Local Government Dissemination of COVID-19 Information: Assessing US County Government Websites Explaining Support for COVID-19 Cell Phone Contact Tracing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1