Detection of anti-phenolic glycolipid I antibodies by ELISA and gelatin particle agglutination test in leprosy in São Paulo (SP), Brazil

C.S. Melo , S.M.O.O. Nitrini , L.F.G. Siqueira
{"title":"Detection of anti-phenolic glycolipid I antibodies by ELISA and gelatin particle agglutination test in leprosy in São Paulo (SP), Brazil","authors":"C.S. Melo ,&nbsp;S.M.O.O. Nitrini ,&nbsp;L.F.G. Siqueira","doi":"10.1016/S0888-0786(96)80005-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A total of 214 serum samples obtained from leprosy patients (96 with the lepromatous form, 36 with the tuberculoid form, 33 with the indeterminate form, and 19 with the borderline form) before and during chemotherapy, from household contacts (<em>n</em> = 18) and from controls (<em>n</em> = 12) were submitted to the <em>M. leprae</em> particle agglutination test (MLPA) and to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of anti-phenolic glycolipid (PGL I) antibodies. ELISA was more sensitive for all clinical forms of leprosy, with greater seropositivity for the lepromatous form (54.64%). For 88 patients with the lepromatous form, we noted that the shorter the time of treatment (≤ 3 years), the higher the percentage of seropositive results (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.01). The present results suggest that both tests could be used to monitor leprosy treatment and in epidemiologic surveys.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101161,"journal":{"name":"Serodiagnosis and Immunotherapy in Infectious Disease","volume":"8 2","pages":"Pages 89-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0888-0786(96)80005-9","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Serodiagnosis and Immunotherapy in Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888078696800059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A total of 214 serum samples obtained from leprosy patients (96 with the lepromatous form, 36 with the tuberculoid form, 33 with the indeterminate form, and 19 with the borderline form) before and during chemotherapy, from household contacts (n = 18) and from controls (n = 12) were submitted to the M. leprae particle agglutination test (MLPA) and to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of anti-phenolic glycolipid (PGL I) antibodies. ELISA was more sensitive for all clinical forms of leprosy, with greater seropositivity for the lepromatous form (54.64%). For 88 patients with the lepromatous form, we noted that the shorter the time of treatment (≤ 3 years), the higher the percentage of seropositive results (P ≤ 0.01). The present results suggest that both tests could be used to monitor leprosy treatment and in epidemiologic surveys.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ELISA和明胶颗粒凝集试验检测巴西圣保罗(SP)麻风病患者抗酚类糖脂I抗体
从麻风患者(麻风型96例,结核型36例,不确定型33例,边缘型19例)、家庭接触者(n = 18)和对照(n = 12)中采集的214份血清样本,在化疗前和化疗期间进行麻风分枝杆菌颗粒凝集试验(MLPA)和酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测抗酚类糖脂(PGL I)抗体。ELISA对所有临床形式的麻风都更敏感,对麻风型的血清阳性率更高(54.64%)。对于88例麻风型患者,我们注意到治疗时间越短(≤3年),血清阳性结果百分比越高(P≤0.01)。目前的结果表明,这两种检测方法可用于监测麻风病治疗和流行病学调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Subject index Volume contents Author index The value of ELISA vs. negative Coombs findings in the serodiagnosis of human brucellosis Detection of toxoplasma-specific antibody in human saliva using conventional assays
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1