Finance Financing Finance: Does Financial Innovation Crowd out Credit Creation by Diverting Consumers and Business Loans Back to the Financial Sector, and How This Affects the Banks’ Performance through Investment, and Lending?

Shumaila Amin, D. Siddiqui
{"title":"Finance Financing Finance: Does Financial Innovation Crowd out Credit Creation by Diverting Consumers and Business Loans Back to the Financial Sector, and How This Affects the Banks’ Performance through Investment, and Lending?","authors":"Shumaila Amin, D. Siddiqui","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3757472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The traditional innovation-growth view posits that financial innovations help facilitate risk sharing, complete the market, and ultimately improve allocative efficiency. However, financial innovations are often attributed as the root cause of the Global Financial Crisis, by engineering securities perceived to be safe but exposed to neglected risks. Financial engineering often is done by banks and investment houses led to the creation of structured products that often compete with conventional lending in the placement of the depositors’ money. Moreover, as there seems to have a lower risk (on paper) due to the use of innovative derivatives, they are often preferred over risky consumer and corporate financing. In this study, we tend to test this hypothesis and explore whether financial innovation crowd out consumer and corporate credit creation and would this affect the long-term returns and growth of banks in Pakistan. For this, we presented a model showing financial innovation (measured by off-balance sheet items as a percentage of total assets), affect bank growth (increase in deposits & net income) as well as profitability (ROE & ROA) indirectly through the mediation of investment, lending, and advance ratio to deposit (ADR). For this purpose, data of 25 banks operating in Pakistan were taken from the year 2010 to 2019, collected from annual reports. Data were analyzed using Structured Equation modeling. The results showed that financial innovation seems to have a negative and significant impact on ADR, however a positive impact on lending. This suggested that consumer and corporate finances might increase with financial innovations but compared to deposits, they are decreasing. This clearly showed that financial innovation crowds out credit creation. At the same time, its effect on investment seems to be significant. Moreover, among the three mediators, the only investment seems to have a positive effect on profitability but a negative effect on growth. The effect of credit creation on growth does not seem to be substantiated. The study showed that financial innovation does not seem to affect either profitability or growth in the above-mentioned mediation framework. Hence, the findings suggested that there are some downsides of financial innovation as it crowds out the credit creation process that could be a crucial engine of economic growth.","PeriodicalId":13701,"journal":{"name":"International Corporate Finance eJournal","volume":"106 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Corporate Finance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3757472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The traditional innovation-growth view posits that financial innovations help facilitate risk sharing, complete the market, and ultimately improve allocative efficiency. However, financial innovations are often attributed as the root cause of the Global Financial Crisis, by engineering securities perceived to be safe but exposed to neglected risks. Financial engineering often is done by banks and investment houses led to the creation of structured products that often compete with conventional lending in the placement of the depositors’ money. Moreover, as there seems to have a lower risk (on paper) due to the use of innovative derivatives, they are often preferred over risky consumer and corporate financing. In this study, we tend to test this hypothesis and explore whether financial innovation crowd out consumer and corporate credit creation and would this affect the long-term returns and growth of banks in Pakistan. For this, we presented a model showing financial innovation (measured by off-balance sheet items as a percentage of total assets), affect bank growth (increase in deposits & net income) as well as profitability (ROE & ROA) indirectly through the mediation of investment, lending, and advance ratio to deposit (ADR). For this purpose, data of 25 banks operating in Pakistan were taken from the year 2010 to 2019, collected from annual reports. Data were analyzed using Structured Equation modeling. The results showed that financial innovation seems to have a negative and significant impact on ADR, however a positive impact on lending. This suggested that consumer and corporate finances might increase with financial innovations but compared to deposits, they are decreasing. This clearly showed that financial innovation crowds out credit creation. At the same time, its effect on investment seems to be significant. Moreover, among the three mediators, the only investment seems to have a positive effect on profitability but a negative effect on growth. The effect of credit creation on growth does not seem to be substantiated. The study showed that financial innovation does not seem to affect either profitability or growth in the above-mentioned mediation framework. Hence, the findings suggested that there are some downsides of financial innovation as it crowds out the credit creation process that could be a crucial engine of economic growth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金融融资金融:金融创新是否通过将消费者和企业贷款转移回金融部门而挤出信贷创造,以及这如何通过投资和贷款影响银行的绩效?
传统的创新增长观点认为,金融创新有助于促进风险分担,完善市场,最终提高配置效率。然而,金融创新往往被认为是全球金融危机的根本原因,因为它设计了被认为是安全的证券,但却暴露于被忽视的风险中。金融工程通常由银行和投资机构完成,导致结构性产品的诞生,这些产品往往与传统贷款竞争存款人的资金配置。此外,由于使用创新衍生品似乎具有较低的风险(账面上),它们往往比风险较高的消费者和企业融资更受青睐。在本研究中,我们倾向于检验这一假设,并探讨金融创新是否会挤出消费者和企业的信贷创造,这是否会影响巴基斯坦银行的长期回报和增长。为此,我们提出了一个模型,显示金融创新(以表外项目占总资产的百分比衡量)影响银行增长(存款增加;净收入)以及盈利能力(ROE &ROA)通过投资、贷款和预存比(ADR)间接中介。为此,从年度报告中收集了2010年至2019年在巴基斯坦经营的25家银行的数据。数据分析采用结构化方程模型。结果表明,金融创新对ADR具有显著的负向影响,但对借贷具有正向影响。这表明,随着金融创新,消费者和企业的资金可能会增加,但与存款相比,它们正在减少。这清楚地表明,金融创新挤占了信贷创造。与此同时,它对投资的影响似乎很大。此外,在三个中介中,唯一的投资似乎对盈利能力有正影响,但对增长有负影响。信贷创造对经济增长的影响似乎没有得到证实。研究表明,在上述中介框架下,金融创新似乎既不影响盈利能力,也不影响增长。因此,研究结果表明,金融创新存在一些缺点,因为它排挤了信贷创造过程,而信贷创造过程可能是经济增长的关键引擎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Supply Chain Channel of Government Credit Pass-through Two Investors, Two Trees, Two Goods The Role of Exchange Rate in Monetary Policy Rules: A Welfare-Based Re-Examination Home–Host Distance in Governance Quality, Foreign Banks’ Lending, and Emerging Host Markets’ Resilience The ESG Home Bias
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1