Instructional Scaffolding Strategies to Support the L2 Writing of EFL College Students in Kuwait

Q4 Arts and Humanities Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal Pub Date : 2023-04-24 DOI:10.5539/elt.v16n5p53
Shu-Hua Wu, Sulaiman Alrabah
{"title":"Instructional Scaffolding Strategies to Support the L2 Writing of EFL College Students in Kuwait","authors":"Shu-Hua Wu, Sulaiman Alrabah","doi":"10.5539/elt.v16n5p53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This classroom-based study investigated the most frequently employed instructional scaffolding strategies to support second language (L2) writing by three English as foreign language (EFL) college teachers in Kuwait. Thus, this study had two aims: (1) to investigate the most frequently-used scaffolding strategies for teaching writing that were employed by the participating EFL teachers, and (2) to survey the students’ perceptions of their teachers’ scaffolding strategies. Data collection methods included classroom observations, a survey, and six group interviews with the three teachers. Microsoft Excel software was used to analyze the numerical data from the survey. The observations and interviews produced the most frequently used strategies for instructional scaffolding in the EFL writing classroom. The grounded survey items were gleaned from the data of the observations and group interviews. The survey was distributed among the students to gain their perceptions of their teachers’ instructional scaffolding strategies. The findings revealed that the three EFL teachers frequently employed the two scaffolding strategies of rhetorical scaffolding and prior knowledge scaffolding. However, they utilized contextual scaffolding and language development scaffolding to a lesser extent in the writing classroom. Implications included the need to orient EFL teachers through training courses on scaffolding strategies and their optimal applications in the writing classroom.","PeriodicalId":30319,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v16n5p53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This classroom-based study investigated the most frequently employed instructional scaffolding strategies to support second language (L2) writing by three English as foreign language (EFL) college teachers in Kuwait. Thus, this study had two aims: (1) to investigate the most frequently-used scaffolding strategies for teaching writing that were employed by the participating EFL teachers, and (2) to survey the students’ perceptions of their teachers’ scaffolding strategies. Data collection methods included classroom observations, a survey, and six group interviews with the three teachers. Microsoft Excel software was used to analyze the numerical data from the survey. The observations and interviews produced the most frequently used strategies for instructional scaffolding in the EFL writing classroom. The grounded survey items were gleaned from the data of the observations and group interviews. The survey was distributed among the students to gain their perceptions of their teachers’ instructional scaffolding strategies. The findings revealed that the three EFL teachers frequently employed the two scaffolding strategies of rhetorical scaffolding and prior knowledge scaffolding. However, they utilized contextual scaffolding and language development scaffolding to a lesser extent in the writing classroom. Implications included the need to orient EFL teachers through training courses on scaffolding strategies and their optimal applications in the writing classroom.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支持科威特大学生第二语言写作的教学框架策略
本以课堂为基础的研究调查了科威特三名英语作为外语(EFL)大学教师最常使用的教学脚手架策略来支持第二语言(L2)写作。因此,本研究有两个目的:(1)调查参与研究的英语教师在写作教学中最常用的脚手架策略;(2)调查学生对教师的脚手架策略的看法。数据收集方法包括课堂观察、调查和对三位教师的六次小组访谈。使用Microsoft Excel软件对调查的数值数据进行分析。通过观察和访谈,得出了英语写作课堂中最常用的教学框架策略。实地调查项目是从观察和小组访谈的数据中收集的。本调查在学生中进行,以了解他们对教师教学脚手架策略的看法。研究发现,这三位英语教师经常使用修辞框架和先验知识框架这两种框架策略。然而,他们在写作课堂上使用语境框架和语言发展框架的程度较低。这意味着需要通过培训课程来引导英语教师学习脚手架策略及其在写作课堂中的最佳应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal
Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Review of English L2 Vocabulary Learning and Teaching: Concepts, Principles, and Pedagogy Actual Usage of Machine Translation by Japanese University Students and Verification of Test Results Reviewer acknowledgements for English Language Teaching, Vol. 16, No. 11, 2023 Research on the Promotion of EAP Teachers' Information Literacy under TPACK Framework in the Era of Digital Intelligence Leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI): Chat GPT for Effective English Language Learning among Thai Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1