{"title":"The doing of the little righteousness - the on-going search for justice after the TRC","authors":"A. Boesak","doi":"10.5952/54-0-341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Taking as point of departure, South African theologian Dirkie\n Smit’s theological oeuvre, particularly his theological reflections on issues such as\n politics, justice, peace and reconciliation, the essay moves on to focus on Mahmood\n Mamdani’s view of the differences between the Nuremberg trials, South Africa’s\n political negotiations held in Kempton Park and the TRC and his critique of the\n latter. This once again raises the matter of justice, different forms of justice –\n especially as either “victor justice” or “survivor justice” and the consequences of\n this for the TRC and for christians in the call for the doing of justice. With\n reference to the views of Desmond Tutu (especially his understanding of the concept\n of ubuntu), it is suggested that the TRC’s only choice was not just between\n retributive and restorative justice, revenge and forgiveness, but that it was\n incumbent upon it to advance the gains made at Kempton Park and to move from\n victim’s justice to survivor’s justice and from the foundation of political justice\n to social justice which it did not do.","PeriodicalId":18902,"journal":{"name":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5952/54-0-341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Taking as point of departure, South African theologian Dirkie
Smit’s theological oeuvre, particularly his theological reflections on issues such as
politics, justice, peace and reconciliation, the essay moves on to focus on Mahmood
Mamdani’s view of the differences between the Nuremberg trials, South Africa’s
political negotiations held in Kempton Park and the TRC and his critique of the
latter. This once again raises the matter of justice, different forms of justice –
especially as either “victor justice” or “survivor justice” and the consequences of
this for the TRC and for christians in the call for the doing of justice. With
reference to the views of Desmond Tutu (especially his understanding of the concept
of ubuntu), it is suggested that the TRC’s only choice was not just between
retributive and restorative justice, revenge and forgiveness, but that it was
incumbent upon it to advance the gains made at Kempton Park and to move from
victim’s justice to survivor’s justice and from the foundation of political justice
to social justice which it did not do.