{"title":"Tech-Check-Tech in Community Pharmacy Practice Settings","authors":"Timothy P. Frost, A. Adams","doi":"10.1177/8755122516683519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The benefit of a tech-check-tech (TCT) practice model in institutional settings has been well documented. To date, few studies have explored TCT beyond institutional settings. This article summarizes the existing evidence in community pharmacy–based TCT research with respect to dispensing accuracy and pharmacist time devoted to direct patient care. Data Sources: A literature review was conducted using MEDLINE (January 1990 to August 2016), Google Scholar (January 1990 to August 2016), and EMBASE (January 1990 to August 2016) using the terms “tech* and check,” “tech-check-tech,” “checking technician,” and “accuracy checking tech*”. Bibliographies were reviewed to identify additional relevant literature. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Studies were included if they analyzed TCT and were conducted in a community pharmacy practice site, inclusive of chain, independent, mass merchant, supermarket, and mail order pharmacies. Studies were excluded if the TCT practice model was conducted in an institutional or long-term care setting. Survey data on theoretical models of TCT in community pharmacy practice settings were also excluded. Data Synthesis: Over the past 14 years, 4 studies were identified indicating TCT has been performed safely and effectively in community settings. The studies demonstrate that trained community technicians perform as accurately as pharmacists and that TCT increased the amount of pharmacist time devoted to clinical activities. In the 2 studies that reported accuracy rates, pharmacy technicians performed at least as accurately as pharmacists (99.445 vs 99.73%, P = .484; 99.95 vs 99.74, P < .05). Furthermore, 3 of the studies reported gains in pharmacist time, with increases between 9.1% and 19.18% of pharmacist time for consultative services. Conclusions: The present studies demonstrate that TCT can be safe and effective in community pharmacy practice settings, with results similar to those found in institutional settings. It is anticipated more states will explore TCT in community settings in the years ahead as a strategy to improve patient care.","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":"47 - 52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/8755122516683519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31
Abstract
Objective: The benefit of a tech-check-tech (TCT) practice model in institutional settings has been well documented. To date, few studies have explored TCT beyond institutional settings. This article summarizes the existing evidence in community pharmacy–based TCT research with respect to dispensing accuracy and pharmacist time devoted to direct patient care. Data Sources: A literature review was conducted using MEDLINE (January 1990 to August 2016), Google Scholar (January 1990 to August 2016), and EMBASE (January 1990 to August 2016) using the terms “tech* and check,” “tech-check-tech,” “checking technician,” and “accuracy checking tech*”. Bibliographies were reviewed to identify additional relevant literature. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Studies were included if they analyzed TCT and were conducted in a community pharmacy practice site, inclusive of chain, independent, mass merchant, supermarket, and mail order pharmacies. Studies were excluded if the TCT practice model was conducted in an institutional or long-term care setting. Survey data on theoretical models of TCT in community pharmacy practice settings were also excluded. Data Synthesis: Over the past 14 years, 4 studies were identified indicating TCT has been performed safely and effectively in community settings. The studies demonstrate that trained community technicians perform as accurately as pharmacists and that TCT increased the amount of pharmacist time devoted to clinical activities. In the 2 studies that reported accuracy rates, pharmacy technicians performed at least as accurately as pharmacists (99.445 vs 99.73%, P = .484; 99.95 vs 99.74, P < .05). Furthermore, 3 of the studies reported gains in pharmacist time, with increases between 9.1% and 19.18% of pharmacist time for consultative services. Conclusions: The present studies demonstrate that TCT can be safe and effective in community pharmacy practice settings, with results similar to those found in institutional settings. It is anticipated more states will explore TCT in community settings in the years ahead as a strategy to improve patient care.
目的:一个技术检查技术(TCT)实践模式在机构设置的好处已经得到了很好的记录。迄今为止,很少有研究在机构环境之外探索TCT。本文总结了基于社区药房的TCT研究中关于调剂准确性和药剂师用于直接患者护理的时间的现有证据。数据来源:使用MEDLINE(1990年1月至2016年8月)、Google Scholar(1990年1月至2016年8月)和EMBASE(1990年1月至2016年8月)进行文献综述,使用术语“技术*和检查”、“技术-检查-技术”、“检查技术员”和“准确性检查技术*”。查阅参考书目以确定其他相关文献。研究选择和数据提取:如果研究分析了TCT,并在社区药房实践现场进行,包括连锁,独立,大型商家,超市和邮购药房,则纳入研究。如果TCT实践模型在机构或长期护理环境中进行,则排除研究。社区药房实践环境中TCT理论模型的调查数据也被排除在外。数据综合:在过去14年中,确定了4项研究,表明在社区环境中安全有效地进行了TCT。这些研究表明,训练有素的社区技术人员的表现与药剂师一样准确,TCT增加了药剂师用于临床活动的时间。在报告准确率的两项研究中,药学技术人员的工作至少与药剂师一样准确(99.445 vs 99.73%, P = .484;99.95 vs 99.74, P < 0.05)。此外,其中3项研究报告了药剂师时间的增加,药剂师咨询服务的时间增加了9.1%到19.18%。结论:目前的研究表明,TCT在社区药房实践环境中是安全有效的,其结果与在机构环境中发现的结果相似。预计未来几年,更多的州将在社区环境中探索TCT,作为改善患者护理的一项战略。
期刊介绍:
For both pharmacists and technicians, jPT provides valuable information for those interested in the entire body of pharmacy practice. jPT covers new drugs, products, and equipment; therapeutic trends; organizational, legal, and educational activities; drug distribution and administration; and includes continuing education articles.