{"title":"Del modelo científico del flogisto al modelo de la oxidación. El concepto de frontera","authors":"Rómulo Gallego Badillo , Royman Pérez Miranda , Adriana Patricia Gallego Torres","doi":"10.1016/j.eq.2015.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article presents the concept of geographical and cultural border as an analogy to construct a different perspective on a historical fact and its main contribution to the origins of Chemistry as one of the sciences of nature. It is thought up on the origin of the model of the Phlogiston and of the reasons English and German chemists had to admit and accept it during the 18th century. It is also demonstrated that the G. E. Stahl proposal was a conceptual and methodological construction, which cannot be abandoned by the simple “entelequia” for the oxygen. An analysis of A. L. Lavoisier work was done in order to discuss the category of “scientific Revolution” of T. S. Kuhn, and conclude, that this step cannot be assumed from the above mentioned perspective.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39011,"journal":{"name":"Educacion Quimica","volume":"26 3","pages":"Pages 242-249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.eq.2015.03.001","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacion Quimica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0187893X15000361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
This article presents the concept of geographical and cultural border as an analogy to construct a different perspective on a historical fact and its main contribution to the origins of Chemistry as one of the sciences of nature. It is thought up on the origin of the model of the Phlogiston and of the reasons English and German chemists had to admit and accept it during the 18th century. It is also demonstrated that the G. E. Stahl proposal was a conceptual and methodological construction, which cannot be abandoned by the simple “entelequia” for the oxygen. An analysis of A. L. Lavoisier work was done in order to discuss the category of “scientific Revolution” of T. S. Kuhn, and conclude, that this step cannot be assumed from the above mentioned perspective.
本文提出了地理和文化边界的概念作为类比,以构建对历史事实的不同视角及其对化学作为自然科学之一的起源的主要贡献。它被认为是基于燃素模型的起源,以及英国和德国化学家在18世纪不得不承认和接受它的原因。这也证明了G. E. Stahl的建议是一个概念和方法上的建构,它不能被简单的“对氧的理解”所抛弃。为了讨论库恩的“科学革命”范畴,对拉瓦锡的工作进行了分析,并得出结论,这一步不能从上面提到的角度来假设。