The changing context of innovation management: A critique of the relevance of the stage-gate approach to current organizations

Q4 Arts and Humanities Prometheus (Italy) Pub Date : 2022-08-30 DOI:10.13169/prometheus.38.2.0207
P. Trott, David Baxter, Paul Ellwood, Patrick van der Duin
{"title":"The changing context of innovation management: A critique of the relevance of the stage-gate approach to current organizations","authors":"P. Trott, David Baxter, Paul Ellwood, Patrick van der Duin","doi":"10.13169/prometheus.38.2.0207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The stage-gate method was initially developed as a description of the new product development practices within high-performing firms. At its heart the concept is simple: and the flow of activity of a stage-gate includes project action, information generation, analysis and decision. Research has shown that the stage-gate method has been extremely successful in many contexts. The question of whether the approach is suitable for all projects in all situations is a principal faultline within the literature. Proponents argue that adaptations and evolutions of the stage approach enable it to be universally applied. This paper provides a critical review of the literature and we identify chronic limitations of stage-gate when evaluated against contemporary challenges, including VUCA (volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity), environment, digitization and open innovation. We remain critical about whether these contemporary currents are best approached by yet another reconfiguration of stage-gate building blocks. We argue that high uncertainty (caused by these currents) requires the flexibility to change fundamental elements of a project, including the underlying concept and the target market, which means that stage-gate is not well suited to innovation processes addressing these contemporary challenges. We propose a typology to show its suitability.","PeriodicalId":38494,"journal":{"name":"Prometheus (Italy)","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prometheus (Italy)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13169/prometheus.38.2.0207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The stage-gate method was initially developed as a description of the new product development practices within high-performing firms. At its heart the concept is simple: and the flow of activity of a stage-gate includes project action, information generation, analysis and decision. Research has shown that the stage-gate method has been extremely successful in many contexts. The question of whether the approach is suitable for all projects in all situations is a principal faultline within the literature. Proponents argue that adaptations and evolutions of the stage approach enable it to be universally applied. This paper provides a critical review of the literature and we identify chronic limitations of stage-gate when evaluated against contemporary challenges, including VUCA (volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity), environment, digitization and open innovation. We remain critical about whether these contemporary currents are best approached by yet another reconfiguration of stage-gate building blocks. We argue that high uncertainty (caused by these currents) requires the flexibility to change fundamental elements of a project, including the underlying concept and the target market, which means that stage-gate is not well suited to innovation processes addressing these contemporary challenges. We propose a typology to show its suitability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创新管理的变化背景:对阶段-门方法与当前组织相关性的批判
阶段-门方法最初是作为高绩效公司新产品开发实践的描述而发展起来的。其核心概念很简单:阶段门的活动流程包括项目行动、信息生成、分析和决策。研究表明,阶段门法在许多情况下都非常成功。该方法是否适用于所有情况下的所有项目的问题是文献中的主要断层线。支持者认为,阶段方法的适应和进化使其能够普遍适用。本文对文献进行了批判性回顾,并在评估当代挑战时确定了阶段-门的长期局限性,包括VUCA(波动性、不确定性、复杂性和模糊性)、环境、数字化和开放式创新。我们仍然对这些当代潮流是否最好地通过另一次重新配置阶段-门的构建模块持批评态度。我们认为,高不确定性(由这些潮流引起)需要灵活地改变项目的基本要素,包括潜在的概念和目标市场,这意味着阶段-门并不适合解决这些当代挑战的创新过程。我们提出了一个类型学来显示它的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Prometheus (Italy)
Prometheus (Italy) Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Graham Dutfield, That High Design of Purest Gold: A Critical History of the Pharmaceutical Industry S. Scott Graham, The Doctor and the Algorithm. Promise, Peril, and the Future of Health AI Larry A. DiMatteo, Cristina Poncibò and Michel Cannarsa (eds) Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence: Global Perspectives on Law and Ethics S. Voeneky, P. Kellmeyer, O. Mueller and W. Burgard (eds) Cambridge Handbook of Responsible Artificial Intelligence: Interdisciplinary Perspectives Learning research: theory building and theory testing in educational technology innovation and beyond
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1