Development and (re)organisation of the Czech LGBT+ movement (1989–2021)

IF 3.1 2区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES East European Politics Pub Date : 2021-12-17 DOI:10.1080/21599165.2021.2015686
Z. Sloboda
{"title":"Development and (re)organisation of the Czech LGBT+ movement (1989–2021)","authors":"Z. Sloboda","doi":"10.1080/21599165.2021.2015686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article is to review the development of the LGBT+ movement in Czechia after 1989. The analytical section introduces three distinctive phases: (1) the movement’s establishment and development during the 1990s, (2) the period culminating (and declining) with the adoption of the Registered Partnership in 2006, and (3) the period characterised as a restructuring of the movement towards the goal of equal parental and marriage rights. The article analyses the development and changes in the organisational structure of the movement (according to [Císař, Ondřej. 2013. “A Typology of Extra-Parliamentary Political Activism in Post-Communist Settings: The Case of the Czech Republic.” In Jacobsson and Saxonberg, 139–168]). It uncovers heterogeneity, mostly concentrated around short transitory moments in each phase which allow the establishment of short-term, often informal, self-organised organisations oriented less on transactional activism, typical for NGOs of the region and time period.","PeriodicalId":46570,"journal":{"name":"East European Politics","volume":"22 1","pages":"281 - 302"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East European Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2021.2015686","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article is to review the development of the LGBT+ movement in Czechia after 1989. The analytical section introduces three distinctive phases: (1) the movement’s establishment and development during the 1990s, (2) the period culminating (and declining) with the adoption of the Registered Partnership in 2006, and (3) the period characterised as a restructuring of the movement towards the goal of equal parental and marriage rights. The article analyses the development and changes in the organisational structure of the movement (according to [Císař, Ondřej. 2013. “A Typology of Extra-Parliamentary Political Activism in Post-Communist Settings: The Case of the Czech Republic.” In Jacobsson and Saxonberg, 139–168]). It uncovers heterogeneity, mostly concentrated around short transitory moments in each phase which allow the establishment of short-term, often informal, self-organised organisations oriented less on transactional activism, typical for NGOs of the region and time period.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
捷克LGBT+运动的发展和(重新)组织(1989-2021)
本文旨在回顾1989年后捷克LGBT+运动的发展历程。分析部分介绍了三个不同的阶段:(1)该运动在20世纪90年代的建立和发展,(2)随着2006年采用注册合伙制而达到高潮(和衰落)的时期,以及(3)这一时期以运动的重组为特征,朝着平等的父母和婚姻权利的目标迈进。本文分析了运动组织结构的发展变化(根据[Císař, Ondřej])。2013. 后共产主义背景下议会外政治活动的类型学:以捷克共和国为例。在雅各布森和萨克森伯格,139-168])。它揭示了异质性,主要集中在每个阶段的短暂瞬间,这些瞬间允许建立短期的、通常是非正式的、自我组织的组织,这些组织较少以交易主义为导向,这是该地区和那个时期的非政府组织的典型特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
East European Politics
East European Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
9.40%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Polarisation through deviation discourse: strategic usage of Europeanisation by political and media actors in Georgia. Are consociations bad for women? Assessing the effectiveness of gender quotas in Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia Polish martial law of 1981 as seen on Facebook. A comparative analysis between the Facebook posts of political parties Czech political parties and the war in Ukraine: continuity of foreign policy stances Comparing public attitudes towards internal and external EU sanctions: the role of populism, trust and Euroscepticism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1