Preliminary effects of a digital mental health intervention for depression and anxiety

Mirjam L. van Orden , Jan C. Kraaijeveld , Annet T. Spijker , Anna V. Silven , Tobias N. Bonten , Niels H. Chavannes , Annemiek van Dijke
{"title":"Preliminary effects of a digital mental health intervention for depression and anxiety","authors":"Mirjam L. van Orden ,&nbsp;Jan C. Kraaijeveld ,&nbsp;Annet T. Spijker ,&nbsp;Anna V. Silven ,&nbsp;Tobias N. Bonten ,&nbsp;Niels H. Chavannes ,&nbsp;Annemiek van Dijke","doi":"10.1016/j.ceh.2022.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Digital mental healthcare interventions (DMHIs) have been repeatedly mentioned as a possible solution for the growing demand for accessible treatment for patients suffering from common mental health problems, i.e. depression and anxiety disorders. However, structural implementation of DMHI is sparse and results on outcome seems inconclusive. To enrich the body of evidence, this paper compares a need-driven digital mental healthcare intervention (DMHI) for patients diagnosed with depression or anxiety disorders with traditional face-to-face treatment. The digital treatment is provided using a smartphone app which provides videoconferencing, chat, calendar- and registration functions.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>In a naturalistic retrospective cohort study patients who received DMHI are compared to patients who received traditional face-to-face treatment. Furthermore three illustrative cases were selected to demonstrate how personalization is expressed in individual treatments.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The first results of the DMHI compare favorably with traditional face-to-face treatment, showing comparable satisfaction rates, equal effectiveness, and a significant decrease in treatment duration in weeks.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The DMHI has the potential to be as effective, but more efficient than traditional face-to-face treatment. Furthermore the digital treatment opens up options to fine-tune the frequency, duration, and content of care contacts to align with patients' individual situations and personal preferences.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100268,"journal":{"name":"Clinical eHealth","volume":"5 ","pages":"Pages 44-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588914122000156/pdfft?md5=143e6fbdff30a74d7274c32e2b41316f&pid=1-s2.0-S2588914122000156-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical eHealth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588914122000156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background

Digital mental healthcare interventions (DMHIs) have been repeatedly mentioned as a possible solution for the growing demand for accessible treatment for patients suffering from common mental health problems, i.e. depression and anxiety disorders. However, structural implementation of DMHI is sparse and results on outcome seems inconclusive. To enrich the body of evidence, this paper compares a need-driven digital mental healthcare intervention (DMHI) for patients diagnosed with depression or anxiety disorders with traditional face-to-face treatment. The digital treatment is provided using a smartphone app which provides videoconferencing, chat, calendar- and registration functions.

Method

In a naturalistic retrospective cohort study patients who received DMHI are compared to patients who received traditional face-to-face treatment. Furthermore three illustrative cases were selected to demonstrate how personalization is expressed in individual treatments.

Results

The first results of the DMHI compare favorably with traditional face-to-face treatment, showing comparable satisfaction rates, equal effectiveness, and a significant decrease in treatment duration in weeks.

Conclusion

The DMHI has the potential to be as effective, but more efficient than traditional face-to-face treatment. Furthermore the digital treatment opens up options to fine-tune the frequency, duration, and content of care contacts to align with patients' individual situations and personal preferences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字心理健康干预对抑郁和焦虑的初步影响
数字精神保健干预措施(DMHIs)已被反复提及,作为一种可能的解决方案,以满足对患有常见精神健康问题(即抑郁症和焦虑症)的患者进行可获得治疗的日益增长的需求。然而,DMHI的结构性实施是稀疏的,结果似乎不确定。为了丰富证据体,本文比较了需求驱动的数字精神卫生保健干预(DMHI)对诊断为抑郁症或焦虑症的患者与传统的面对面治疗。数字治疗是通过智能手机应用程序提供的,该应用程序提供视频会议、聊天、日历和注册功能。方法在一项自然回溯队列研究中,将接受DMHI治疗的患者与接受传统面对面治疗的患者进行比较。此外,还选择了三个说明性案例来说明个性化是如何在个体治疗中表达的。结果DMHI的初步结果优于传统的面对面治疗,显示出相当的满意率,相同的效果,治疗持续时间(周)显著缩短。结论DMHI具有与传统面对面治疗相同的疗效,但比传统面对面治疗更有效。此外,数字治疗提供了微调护理接触频率、持续时间和内容的选择,以配合患者的个人情况和个人偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“AI et al.” The perils of overreliance on Artificial Intelligence by authors in scientific research A systematic review of eHealth and mHealth interventions for lymphedema patients Machine learning and transfer learning techniques for accurate brain tumor classification Internet of Things in healthcare: An adaptive ethical framework for IoT in digital health IoMT Tsukamoto Type-2 fuzzy expert system for tuberculosis and Alzheimer’s disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1