The New South Wales youth drug and alcohol court program: A decade of development

S. Turner
{"title":"The New South Wales youth drug and alcohol court program: A decade of development","authors":"S. Turner","doi":"10.26180/5DB7FE8F069CD","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2010, the NSW Youth Drug and Alcohol Court ('YDAC') Program celebrated its 10th year of continual operation, but despite a promising early evaluation of the Program, 1 it remains an indefinite pilot. In 2000, the year the YDAC program commenced as a pilot, Freiberg remarked that, '[o]n balance, Australia is right in experimenting with drug courts, providing that they are rigorously and carefully evaluated and carefully targeted at those who are most likely to benefit.' Notably, the 'NSW Drug Summit 1999 - Government Plan of Action', declared that '[a]s with the adult Drug Court program, the Youth Drug Court will be carefully evaluated.' However, to date there is only one published evaluation of the YDAC Program4 and very limited available information that describes or analyses its development and current structure and characteristics. This paper attempts to redress this gap in the literature somewhat, by providing a descriptive overview of the YDAC Program based on publicly available information about the program and the author's own experiences as the former manager of this program. This is then critically compared to research evidence about criminal justice programs and services that work to reduce young offenders' rates of recidivism and harmful substance misuse.","PeriodicalId":44672,"journal":{"name":"Monash University Law Review","volume":"36 1","pages":"280-297"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monash University Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26180/5DB7FE8F069CD","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In 2010, the NSW Youth Drug and Alcohol Court ('YDAC') Program celebrated its 10th year of continual operation, but despite a promising early evaluation of the Program, 1 it remains an indefinite pilot. In 2000, the year the YDAC program commenced as a pilot, Freiberg remarked that, '[o]n balance, Australia is right in experimenting with drug courts, providing that they are rigorously and carefully evaluated and carefully targeted at those who are most likely to benefit.' Notably, the 'NSW Drug Summit 1999 - Government Plan of Action', declared that '[a]s with the adult Drug Court program, the Youth Drug Court will be carefully evaluated.' However, to date there is only one published evaluation of the YDAC Program4 and very limited available information that describes or analyses its development and current structure and characteristics. This paper attempts to redress this gap in the literature somewhat, by providing a descriptive overview of the YDAC Program based on publicly available information about the program and the author's own experiences as the former manager of this program. This is then critically compared to research evidence about criminal justice programs and services that work to reduce young offenders' rates of recidivism and harmful substance misuse.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新南威尔士州青少年毒品和酒精法庭项目:十年发展
2010年,新南威尔士州青少年毒品和酒精法庭(" YDAC ")方案庆祝了其持续运作的第10个年头,但尽管对该方案进行了有希望的早期评估,但它仍然是一个无限期的试点项目。2000年,也就是YDAC项目作为试点开始的那一年,Freiberg评论说:“总的来说,澳大利亚在毒品法庭上进行试验是正确的,只要它们经过严格和仔细的评估,并谨慎地针对那些最有可能受益的人。”值得注意的是,“1999年新南威尔士州毒品首脑会议——政府行动计划”宣布,“与成人毒品法庭方案一样,将仔细评估青少年毒品法庭。”然而,到目前为止,只有一份关于YDAC项目的公开评价,而且描述或分析其发展及其当前结构和特征的可用信息非常有限。本文试图在一定程度上弥补文献中的这一空白,通过提供一个描述性的概述YDAC计划基于公开的信息和作者自己的经验,作为该计划的前任经理。然后将其与刑事司法项目和服务的研究证据进行严格比较,这些项目和服务旨在降低年轻罪犯的累犯率和有害物质滥用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Revisiting Section 32(1) of the Victorian Charter: strained constructions and legislative intention Peoplehood Obscured? The Normative Status of Self-Determination after the Chagos Advisory Opinion (Advance) Is the Wisdom of a Person's Decision Relevant to Their Capacity to Make That Decision? Not Black and White?: Disciplinary Regulation of Doctors Convicted of Child Pornography Offences in Australia Reconceptualising the Law of the Dead by Expanding the Interests of the Living
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1