Analysis of Mixed Methods Graduate Thesis Studies in Special Education Programs in Turkey

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Qualitative Research in Education-Egitimde Nitel Arastirmalar Dergisi Pub Date : 2022-01-29 DOI:10.14689/enad.29.1
M. Dogan, S. Çelik, G. Tomris
{"title":"Analysis of Mixed Methods Graduate Thesis Studies in Special Education Programs in Turkey","authors":"M. Dogan, S. Çelik, G. Tomris","doi":"10.14689/enad.29.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to analyze mixed methods graduate thesis studies completed between 2010 and 2020 in special education programs in Turkey. The literature scan has yielded 26 studies. A qualitative research method, analytical research design has been employed in this study. Research data has been obtained from documents – namely the graduate thesis studies – and analyzed through content analysis carried out following fundamental stages of mixed methods research as proposed in the literature. These stages served as themes in this study: 'Determining the research aim and research questions', 'Selecting a mixed methods research design', 'Explaining the rationale for the mixed methods approach', 'Sampling', 'Collecting the data', 'Analysing the data', 'Integrating, interpreting and reporting the data', 'Researcher competencies and roles' and 'Ethics'. The limitations observed in the methodology and reporting of the thesis studies have suggested that the quality standards of mixed methods research are not reflected on the studies. These limitations include confusion in terminology, lack of explanation as to why the method and the design have been employed, restricted validity and reliability, and lack of integration through blending quantitative and qualitative data. In summary, despite the increase in the number of mixed methods research studies in special education has contributed to the field, it is still debatable whether the philosophical perspective behind the method and its strong suits can be reflected on the studies.","PeriodicalId":41153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Qualitative Research in Education-Egitimde Nitel Arastirmalar Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Qualitative Research in Education-Egitimde Nitel Arastirmalar Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.29.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This research aims to analyze mixed methods graduate thesis studies completed between 2010 and 2020 in special education programs in Turkey. The literature scan has yielded 26 studies. A qualitative research method, analytical research design has been employed in this study. Research data has been obtained from documents – namely the graduate thesis studies – and analyzed through content analysis carried out following fundamental stages of mixed methods research as proposed in the literature. These stages served as themes in this study: 'Determining the research aim and research questions', 'Selecting a mixed methods research design', 'Explaining the rationale for the mixed methods approach', 'Sampling', 'Collecting the data', 'Analysing the data', 'Integrating, interpreting and reporting the data', 'Researcher competencies and roles' and 'Ethics'. The limitations observed in the methodology and reporting of the thesis studies have suggested that the quality standards of mixed methods research are not reflected on the studies. These limitations include confusion in terminology, lack of explanation as to why the method and the design have been employed, restricted validity and reliability, and lack of integration through blending quantitative and qualitative data. In summary, despite the increase in the number of mixed methods research studies in special education has contributed to the field, it is still debatable whether the philosophical perspective behind the method and its strong suits can be reflected on the studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土耳其特殊教育项目中混合方法的研究生论文研究分析
本研究旨在分析2010年至2020年在土耳其特殊教育项目中完成的混合方法研究生论文研究。文献扫描产生了26项研究。本研究采用定性研究方法,即分析研究设计。研究数据从文献中获得,即研究生论文研究,并通过内容分析进行分析,根据文献中提出的混合方法研究的基本阶段进行分析。这些阶段是本研究的主题:“确定研究目标和研究问题”、“选择混合方法研究设计”、“解释混合方法方法的基本原理”、“抽样”、“收集数据”、“分析数据”、“整合、解释和报告数据”、“研究人员的能力和角色”和“伦理”。在论文研究的方法学和报告中观察到的局限性表明,混合方法研究的质量标准没有反映在研究中。这些限制包括术语的混淆,缺乏对为什么采用这种方法和设计的解释,有限的有效性和可靠性,以及通过混合定量和定性数据缺乏整合。综上所述,尽管混合方法研究在特殊教育领域的数量有所增加,但这种方法及其优势背后的哲学观点是否能在研究中得到反映,仍是值得商榷的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Teacher's Classroom Practices in the Context of Vygotsky's Cultural-Historical Theory The Connection Between Forest School and Preschool Programs: A Comparison Study Management of Artistic Practice Pedagogies of Interdisciplinary Art Students With Critical Analysis Learning Method Online Counseling through the Eyes of University Students Uzaktan Eğitim Kapsamında İlkokul İkinci Sınıf Türkçe Dersinde Çocuklar İçin Felsefe Eğitimi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1