Clinical Framework and Medical Countermeasure Use During an Anthrax Mass-Casualty Incident.

IF 33.7 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Mmwr Recommendations and Reports Pub Date : 2015-12-04 DOI:10.15585/mmwr.rr6404a1
W. Bower, K. Hendricks, Satish K. Pillai, Julie T Guarnizo, D. Meaney-Delman
{"title":"Clinical Framework and Medical Countermeasure Use During an Anthrax Mass-Casualty Incident.","authors":"W. Bower, K. Hendricks, Satish K. Pillai, Julie T Guarnizo, D. Meaney-Delman","doi":"10.15585/mmwr.rr6404a1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2014, CDC published updated guidelines for the prevention and treatment of anthrax (Hendricks KA, Wright ME, Shadomy SV, et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention expert panel meetings on prevention and treatment of anthrax in adults. Emerg Infect Dis 2014;20[2]. Available at http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/20/2/13-0687_article.htm). These guidelines provided recommended best practices for the diagnosis and treatment of persons with naturally occurring or bioterrorism-related anthrax in conventional medical settings. An aerosolized release of Bacillus anthracis spores over densely populated areas could become a mass-casualty incident. To prepare for this possibility, the U.S. government has stockpiled equipment and therapeutics (known as medical countermeasures [MCMs]) for anthrax prevention and treatment. However, previously developed, publicly available clinical recommendations have not addressed the use of MCMs or clinical management during an anthrax mass-casualty incident, when the number of patients is likely to exceed the ability of the health care infrastructure to provide conventional standards of care and supplies of MCMs might be inadequate to meet the demand required. To address this gap, in 2013, CDC conducted a series of systematic reviews of the scientific literature on anthrax to identify evidence that could help clinicians and public health authorities set guidelines for intravenous antimicrobial and antitoxin use, diagnosis of anthrax meningitis, and management of common anthrax-specific complications in the setting of a mass-casualty incident. Evidence from these reviews was presented to professionals with expertise in anthrax, critical care, and disaster medicine during a series of workgroup meetings that were held from August 2013 through March 2014. In March 2014, a meeting was held at which 102 subject matter experts discussed the evidence and adapted the existing best practices guidance to a clinical use framework for the judicious, efficient, and rational use of stockpiled MCMs for the treatment of anthrax during a mass-casualty incident, which is described in this report. This report addresses elements of hospital-based acute care, specifically antitoxins and intravenous antimicrobial use, and the diagnosis and management of common anthrax-specific complications during a mass-casualty incident. The recommendations in this report should be implemented only after predefined triggers have been met for shifting from conventional to contingency or crisis standards of care, such as when the magnitude of cases might lead to impending shortages of intravenous antimicrobials, antitoxins, critical care resources (e.g., chest tubes and chest drainage systems), or diagnostic capability. This guidance does not address primary triage decisions, anthrax postexposure prophylaxis, hospital bed or workforce surge capacity, or the logistics of dispensing MCMs. Clinicians, hospital administrators, state and local health officials, and planners can use these recommendations to assist in the development of crisis protocols that will ensure national preparedness for an anthrax mass-casualty incident.","PeriodicalId":51328,"journal":{"name":"Mmwr Recommendations and Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":33.7000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"470","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mmwr Recommendations and Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.rr6404a1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 470

Abstract

In 2014, CDC published updated guidelines for the prevention and treatment of anthrax (Hendricks KA, Wright ME, Shadomy SV, et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention expert panel meetings on prevention and treatment of anthrax in adults. Emerg Infect Dis 2014;20[2]. Available at http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/20/2/13-0687_article.htm). These guidelines provided recommended best practices for the diagnosis and treatment of persons with naturally occurring or bioterrorism-related anthrax in conventional medical settings. An aerosolized release of Bacillus anthracis spores over densely populated areas could become a mass-casualty incident. To prepare for this possibility, the U.S. government has stockpiled equipment and therapeutics (known as medical countermeasures [MCMs]) for anthrax prevention and treatment. However, previously developed, publicly available clinical recommendations have not addressed the use of MCMs or clinical management during an anthrax mass-casualty incident, when the number of patients is likely to exceed the ability of the health care infrastructure to provide conventional standards of care and supplies of MCMs might be inadequate to meet the demand required. To address this gap, in 2013, CDC conducted a series of systematic reviews of the scientific literature on anthrax to identify evidence that could help clinicians and public health authorities set guidelines for intravenous antimicrobial and antitoxin use, diagnosis of anthrax meningitis, and management of common anthrax-specific complications in the setting of a mass-casualty incident. Evidence from these reviews was presented to professionals with expertise in anthrax, critical care, and disaster medicine during a series of workgroup meetings that were held from August 2013 through March 2014. In March 2014, a meeting was held at which 102 subject matter experts discussed the evidence and adapted the existing best practices guidance to a clinical use framework for the judicious, efficient, and rational use of stockpiled MCMs for the treatment of anthrax during a mass-casualty incident, which is described in this report. This report addresses elements of hospital-based acute care, specifically antitoxins and intravenous antimicrobial use, and the diagnosis and management of common anthrax-specific complications during a mass-casualty incident. The recommendations in this report should be implemented only after predefined triggers have been met for shifting from conventional to contingency or crisis standards of care, such as when the magnitude of cases might lead to impending shortages of intravenous antimicrobials, antitoxins, critical care resources (e.g., chest tubes and chest drainage systems), or diagnostic capability. This guidance does not address primary triage decisions, anthrax postexposure prophylaxis, hospital bed or workforce surge capacity, or the logistics of dispensing MCMs. Clinicians, hospital administrators, state and local health officials, and planners can use these recommendations to assist in the development of crisis protocols that will ensure national preparedness for an anthrax mass-casualty incident.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
炭疽大规模伤亡事件的临床框架及医疗对策应用
2014年,疾病预防控制中心发布了最新的炭疽热预防和治疗指南(Hendricks KA, Wright ME, Shadomy SV等)。疾病控制和预防中心专家小组会议,讨论成人炭疽的预防和治疗。传染病杂志,2014;20[2]。网址:http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/20/2/13-0687_article.htm)。这些准则为在常规医疗环境中诊断和治疗自然发生的炭疽或与生物恐怖主义有关的炭疽提供了推荐的最佳做法。炭疽芽孢杆菌孢子在人口稠密地区的雾化释放可能成为大规模伤亡事件。为了应对这种可能性,美国政府储备了预防和治疗炭疽热的设备和治疗药物(被称为医疗对策[mcm])。然而,以前制定的、可公开获得的临床建议并没有涉及在炭疽大规模伤亡事件中使用mcm或临床管理的问题,因为在这种情况下,患者人数可能超过卫生保健基础设施提供常规标准护理的能力,而mcm的供应可能不足以满足所需的需求。为了弥补这一差距,2013年,疾病预防控制中心对有关炭疽的科学文献进行了一系列系统审查,以确定证据,帮助临床医生和公共卫生当局制定静脉注射抗菌素和抗毒素使用指南,诊断炭疽性脑膜炎,以及在发生大规模伤亡事件时处理常见炭疽特异性并发症。在2013年8月至2014年3月举行的一系列工作组会议上,这些审查的证据被提交给具有炭疽、重症监护和灾难医学专业知识的专业人员。2014年3月举行了一次会议,102名主题专家讨论了证据,并将现有最佳做法指南改编为临床使用框架,以便在大规模伤亡事件中明智、有效和合理地使用储存的mcm来治疗炭疽,本报告对此进行了描述。本报告涉及医院急性护理的要素,特别是抗毒素和静脉注射抗菌素的使用,以及大规模伤亡事件中常见炭疽特异性并发症的诊断和管理。本报告中的建议只有在满足从传统护理标准转向应急或危机护理标准的预定触发条件后才能实施,例如当病例的严重程度可能导致静脉注射抗菌剂、抗毒素、重症护理资源(例如胸管和胸引流系统)或诊断能力即将短缺时。本指南不涉及初级分诊决定、炭疽接触后预防、医院床位或劳动力激增能力,或mcm分发的后勤。临床医生、医院管理人员、州和地方卫生官员以及规划人员可以利用这些建议协助制定危机处理方案,以确保国家为炭疽大规模伤亡事件做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mmwr Recommendations and Reports
Mmwr Recommendations and Reports PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
36.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: The MMWR series of publications is published by the Office of Science, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), U.S. The MMWR Recommendations and Reports contain in-depth articles that relay policy statements for prevention and treatment in all areas in the CDC’s scope of responsibility (e.g., recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices).
期刊最新文献
Prevention and Control of Seasonal Influenza with Vaccines: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices - United States, 2024-25 Influenza Season. U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2024. U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2024. CDC Clinical Guidelines on the Use of Doxycycline Postexposure Prophylaxis for Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infection Prevention, United States, 2024. CDC Laboratory Recommendations for Syphilis Testing, United States, 2024.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1