Contemporary Perspectives for Technological Entrepreneurship in the Age of Change: Between Success and Resilience

Victor Mignenan
{"title":"Contemporary Perspectives for Technological Entrepreneurship in the Age of Change: Between Success and Resilience","authors":"Victor Mignenan","doi":"10.5539/ibr.v16n6p1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem: why are some technology entrepreneurship projects successfully, resilient and others not when they are executed in the same ecosystem? \n \nResearch objectives: to revise conceptual and theoretical portraits of the process of technological entrepreneurship; propose a model that incorporates multidimensional factors that can effectively contribute to the success and resilience of technology entrepreneurship. \n \nMethodology: we used the inductive approach and a qualitative exploratory strategy. Private and public companies are our sample for convenience. \n \nResults: at the design stage, human capital and relationship capital identify market issues and opportunities. at the implementation and development stage, human, relational, structural, and technological capital are effective levers to generate performance and resilience. Finally, at the marketing and consolidation stage, human, structural, relational, financial, and technological capital have an undeniable contribution. But it is above all the integration of all these factors that generates success and resilience. \n \nImplications and limitations: the chapter is useful for researchers, entrepreneurs and governments who will find strategies to enhance the success and resilience of technological entrepreneurship. This research is part of the theory of artificial science. The adoption of an inductive approach and a qualitative strategy is one of its limitations. Future research could use the mixed strategy to extrapolate results.","PeriodicalId":13861,"journal":{"name":"International journal of business research","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of business research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v16n6p1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem: why are some technology entrepreneurship projects successfully, resilient and others not when they are executed in the same ecosystem? Research objectives: to revise conceptual and theoretical portraits of the process of technological entrepreneurship; propose a model that incorporates multidimensional factors that can effectively contribute to the success and resilience of technology entrepreneurship. Methodology: we used the inductive approach and a qualitative exploratory strategy. Private and public companies are our sample for convenience. Results: at the design stage, human capital and relationship capital identify market issues and opportunities. at the implementation and development stage, human, relational, structural, and technological capital are effective levers to generate performance and resilience. Finally, at the marketing and consolidation stage, human, structural, relational, financial, and technological capital have an undeniable contribution. But it is above all the integration of all these factors that generates success and resilience. Implications and limitations: the chapter is useful for researchers, entrepreneurs and governments who will find strategies to enhance the success and resilience of technological entrepreneurship. This research is part of the theory of artificial science. The adoption of an inductive approach and a qualitative strategy is one of its limitations. Future research could use the mixed strategy to extrapolate results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
变革时代科技创业的当代视角:在成功与韧性之间
问题:为什么在同一个生态系统中执行的技术创业项目,有些成功,有些有弹性,有些则不然?研究目标:修正技术创业过程的概念和理论描述;提出一个包含多维因素的模型,可以有效地促进技术创业的成功和弹性。方法:我们使用归纳方法和定性探索策略。为了方便起见,我们以私营和上市公司为样本。结果:在设计阶段,人力资本和关系资本识别市场问题和机会。在实施和开发阶段,人力、关系、结构和技术资本是产生绩效和弹性的有效杠杆。最后,在营销和整合阶段,人力资本、结构资本、关系资本、财务资本和技术资本都有不可否认的贡献。但最重要的是,所有这些因素的综合才能产生成功和韧性。启示和局限性:本章对研究人员、企业家和政府有帮助,他们将找到提高技术创业成功和弹性的策略。这项研究是人工科学理论的一部分。采用归纳方法和定性策略是其局限性之一。未来的研究可以使用混合策略来推断结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
IDENTIFYING LEADERSHIP ETHICS: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF WARRICK'S (1981) LEADERSHIP STYLE IDENTIFIER FRAMEWORK Banking Transparency, Financial Information and Liquidity Risk Management: Case of Saudi Banks Reviewer Acknowledgements for International Business Research, Vol. 16, No. 11 Birth Order and Executive Risk-Taking: A Study on CEO Behavioral Disposition The Chance of FinTech to be a New General-Purpose Technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1