Ensuring Organization-Intervention Fit for a Participatory Organizational Intervention to Improve Food Service Workers' Health and Wellbeing: Workplace Organizational Health Study.

Susan E. Peters, K. Nielsen, E. Nagler, Anna Revette, Jennifer R. Madden, Glorian Sorensen
{"title":"Ensuring Organization-Intervention Fit for a Participatory Organizational Intervention to Improve Food Service Workers' Health and Wellbeing: Workplace Organizational Health Study.","authors":"Susan E. Peters, K. Nielsen, E. Nagler, Anna Revette, Jennifer R. Madden, Glorian Sorensen","doi":"10.1097/JOM.0000000000001792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nFood-service workers' health and wellbeing is impacted by their jobs and work environments. Formative research methods were used to explore working conditions impacting workers' health to inform intervention planning and implementation and to enhance the intervention's 'fit' to the organization.\n\n\nMETHODS\nFour qualitative methods (worker focus groups; manager interviews; worksite observations; multi-stakeholder workshop) explored in-depth and then prioritized working conditions impacting workers' health as targets for an intervention.\n\n\nRESULTS\nPrioritized working conditions included: ergonomics; work intensity; career development and job enrichment. Data revealed necessary intervention mechanisms to enhance intervention implementation: worker and management communication infrastructure; employee participation in intervention planning and implementation; tailored worksite strategies; and ensuring leadership commitment.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThese targeted, comprehensive methods move away from a typical focus on generic working conditions, e.g. job demands and physical work environment, to explore those conditions unique to an organization. Thereby, enhancing 'intervention-fit' at multiple levels within the company context.","PeriodicalId":46545,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Food-service workers' health and wellbeing is impacted by their jobs and work environments. Formative research methods were used to explore working conditions impacting workers' health to inform intervention planning and implementation and to enhance the intervention's 'fit' to the organization. METHODS Four qualitative methods (worker focus groups; manager interviews; worksite observations; multi-stakeholder workshop) explored in-depth and then prioritized working conditions impacting workers' health as targets for an intervention. RESULTS Prioritized working conditions included: ergonomics; work intensity; career development and job enrichment. Data revealed necessary intervention mechanisms to enhance intervention implementation: worker and management communication infrastructure; employee participation in intervention planning and implementation; tailored worksite strategies; and ensuring leadership commitment. CONCLUSIONS These targeted, comprehensive methods move away from a typical focus on generic working conditions, e.g. job demands and physical work environment, to explore those conditions unique to an organization. Thereby, enhancing 'intervention-fit' at multiple levels within the company context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确保组织干预适合参与式组织干预以改善食品服务工作者的健康和福祉:工作场所组织健康研究。
目的食品服务工作者的健康和福祉受到其工作和工作环境的影响。采用形成性研究方法探索影响工人健康的工作条件,为干预计划和实施提供信息,并增强干预措施与组织的“契合度”。方法四种定性方法(工人焦点小组;经理面试;现场观察;多方利益相关者研讨会)深入探讨了影响工人健康的工作条件,然后将其列为干预目标的优先事项。结果优先工作条件包括:人体工程学;工作强度;职业发展和工作丰富。数据揭示了必要的干预机制,以加强干预的实施:工人和管理层的沟通基础设施;员工参与干预计划和实施;量身定制的工作场所策略;确保领导的承诺。这些有针对性的、全面的方法不再关注一般的工作条件,例如工作需求和物理工作环境,而是探索组织的独特条件。因此,在公司背景下,在多个层面加强“干预配合”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Use of Metabolomic Tool in Assessing Environmental Exposure Fine and Ultrafine Particle Pollution Before and After a Smoking ban in the Catering Industry in Vienna Investigating the level of Safety Considerations in Radiology Centers (North of Iran): Cross –Sectional Study New Highlights. The Last Note.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1