Communal sharing within and beyond digital platforms: Prefiguring interdependent sharing cities

Inka Santala, Pauline McGuirk
{"title":"Communal sharing within and beyond digital platforms: Prefiguring interdependent sharing cities","authors":"Inka Santala,&nbsp;Pauline McGuirk","doi":"10.1016/j.diggeo.2022.100026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While life-as-usual remains disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, cities rely increasingly on community-based and often digitally-enabled sharing of knowledge, skills and resources. These emergent forms of ‘communal sharing’ cannot be explained through instrumentally-beneficial economic discourses or structurally-disruptive political narratives alone. Rather, they call for revaluing the interdependent social relations that digital platforms enable and maintain. Drawing from a relational ontology of transformative social innovation, this paper begins to reframe communal sharing as inherently interdependent social relations between citizens and across civic, market and government domains. These interdependencies mean that sharing through digital platforms is not only responding to, or resisting, dominantly neoliberalist urban logics but is both formed by and reforming new understandings of urban agency. To explore these new understandings of being, doing and thinking of the city as shared, the paper adopts a generative epistemology of postcapitalist politics. Reading communal sharing as not merely interdependent but as fundamentally prefigurative of urban structures, norms and behaviours, the paper develops a post-structuralist approach to sharing cities. This approach illustrates practices as co-determined, communities as resourceful, and initiatives as highly adaptive socio-spatial performances taking place within and beyond digital platforms. Recognising and nurturing the enabling role of digital in sharing cities, the paper adopts the hopeful stance of reconceptualising communal sharing to open space for social and sectoral divides to be bridged and reimagined beyond the pandemic accelerations of platform capitalism.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100377,"journal":{"name":"Digital Geography and Society","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100026"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666378322000010/pdfft?md5=953298d5489cfe3617fb0d3bc2d1cfb8&pid=1-s2.0-S2666378322000010-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Geography and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666378322000010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While life-as-usual remains disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, cities rely increasingly on community-based and often digitally-enabled sharing of knowledge, skills and resources. These emergent forms of ‘communal sharing’ cannot be explained through instrumentally-beneficial economic discourses or structurally-disruptive political narratives alone. Rather, they call for revaluing the interdependent social relations that digital platforms enable and maintain. Drawing from a relational ontology of transformative social innovation, this paper begins to reframe communal sharing as inherently interdependent social relations between citizens and across civic, market and government domains. These interdependencies mean that sharing through digital platforms is not only responding to, or resisting, dominantly neoliberalist urban logics but is both formed by and reforming new understandings of urban agency. To explore these new understandings of being, doing and thinking of the city as shared, the paper adopts a generative epistemology of postcapitalist politics. Reading communal sharing as not merely interdependent but as fundamentally prefigurative of urban structures, norms and behaviours, the paper develops a post-structuralist approach to sharing cities. This approach illustrates practices as co-determined, communities as resourceful, and initiatives as highly adaptive socio-spatial performances taking place within and beyond digital platforms. Recognising and nurturing the enabling role of digital in sharing cities, the paper adopts the hopeful stance of reconceptualising communal sharing to open space for social and sectoral divides to be bridged and reimagined beyond the pandemic accelerations of platform capitalism.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字平台内外的公共共享:预测相互依存的共享城市
虽然日常生活仍然受到COVID-19大流行的干扰,但城市越来越依赖以社区为基础,往往以数字化方式共享知识、技能和资源。这些新兴的“公共分享”形式不能仅仅通过有利于工具的经济话语或破坏结构的政治叙事来解释。相反,他们呼吁重新评估数字平台实现和维护的相互依存的社会关系。从转型社会创新的关系本体论出发,本文开始将公共共享重新定义为公民之间以及跨越公民、市场和政府领域的内在相互依存的社会关系。这些相互依赖意味着,通过数字平台进行共享不仅是对新自由主义城市逻辑的回应或抵制,而且是由对城市代理的新理解形成和改革的。为了探索这些对城市存在、行为和思维的新理解,本文采用了后资本主义政治的生成认识论。将公共共享解读为不仅相互依赖,而且从根本上预示着城市结构、规范和行为,本文发展了一种共享城市的后结构主义方法。这种方法说明了实践是共同决定的,社区是资源丰富的,倡议是高度适应性的社会空间表现,发生在数字平台内外。认识到并培育数字在共享城市中的促进作用,本文采取了一种充满希望的立场,即重新定义公共共享,为弥合社会和部门鸿沟开辟空间,并在平台资本主义的大流行加速之外重新设想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Broker bureaucracies: The subsidiary offices of the digitalizing state (Retail) platform legitimation through municipal partnerships? Characterizing climate change sentiments in Alaska on social media Counter-mapping platformization. Rethinking the spatial differentiation of platform control, labor relations and restaurant virtualization in proprietary markets for food-delivery Synthetic geospatial data and fake geography: A case study on the implications of AI-derived data in a data-intensive society
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1