Comparison of Favipiravir to Hydroxychloroquine Plus Azithromycin in the Treatment of Patients with Non-critical COVID-19: A Single-center, Retrospective, Propensity Score-matched Study

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 Medicine Acta Medica Mediterranea Pub Date : 2022-03-17 DOI:10.32552/2022.actamedica.719
O. A. Uyaroğlu, M. Ç. Sönmezer, G. Telli Dizman, Nursel Çalık Başaran, S. Karahan, Ö. Uzun
{"title":"Comparison of Favipiravir to Hydroxychloroquine Plus Azithromycin in the Treatment of Patients with Non-critical COVID-19: A Single-center, Retrospective, Propensity Score-matched Study","authors":"O. A. Uyaroğlu, M. Ç. Sönmezer, G. Telli Dizman, Nursel Çalık Başaran, S. Karahan, Ö. Uzun","doi":"10.32552/2022.actamedica.719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: In this study, we compared the clinical outcomes and effects of the treatments on laboratory parameters between patients who were treated with favipiravir (FAV) or hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin (HCQ/AZ) for COVID-19 pneumonia in non-Intensive Care Unit (non-ICU) patients. \nMethods: We collected data of 260 moderate or severe COVID-19 patients hospitalized in COVID-19 wards between March 20, 2020, and September 30, 2020 retrospectively. We used propensity score matching to evaluate treatment effect on laboratory parameters of COVID-19 infection. \nResults: We compared 42 patients using FAV and 42 HCQ/AZ after propensity score matching. While there were statistical differences between the therapy groups in terms of transfer to ICU and/or exitus before matching (p=0.031), this was not significant after propensity analysis (p=0.250). Patients treated with FAV stayed in the hospital nearly one more day than HCQ/AZ group but the difference was not statistically significant (9.02 days vs 8.14 days, p=0.903). The levels of AST,ALT, and LDH increased at discharge in both groups, especially in the FAV group. \nConclusions: FAV is not superior to HCQ/AZ in the treatment of COVID-19 infection in hospitalized patients with pneumonia.","PeriodicalId":50891,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica Mediterranea","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica Mediterranea","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32552/2022.actamedica.719","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In this study, we compared the clinical outcomes and effects of the treatments on laboratory parameters between patients who were treated with favipiravir (FAV) or hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin (HCQ/AZ) for COVID-19 pneumonia in non-Intensive Care Unit (non-ICU) patients. Methods: We collected data of 260 moderate or severe COVID-19 patients hospitalized in COVID-19 wards between March 20, 2020, and September 30, 2020 retrospectively. We used propensity score matching to evaluate treatment effect on laboratory parameters of COVID-19 infection. Results: We compared 42 patients using FAV and 42 HCQ/AZ after propensity score matching. While there were statistical differences between the therapy groups in terms of transfer to ICU and/or exitus before matching (p=0.031), this was not significant after propensity analysis (p=0.250). Patients treated with FAV stayed in the hospital nearly one more day than HCQ/AZ group but the difference was not statistically significant (9.02 days vs 8.14 days, p=0.903). The levels of AST,ALT, and LDH increased at discharge in both groups, especially in the FAV group. Conclusions: FAV is not superior to HCQ/AZ in the treatment of COVID-19 infection in hospitalized patients with pneumonia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法匹拉韦与羟氯喹加阿奇霉素治疗非危重型COVID-19患者的比较:一项单中心、回顾性、倾向评分匹配的研究
目的:比较favipiravir (FAV)与羟氯喹+阿奇霉素(HCQ/AZ)治疗COVID-19肺炎非重症监护病房(非icu)患者的临床结局及治疗对实验室参数的影响。方法:回顾性收集2020年3月20日至2020年9月30日在COVID-19病房住院的260例中、重度COVID-19患者的资料。采用倾向评分匹配法评价治疗对COVID-19感染实验室参数的影响。结果:在倾向评分匹配后,我们比较了42例FAV患者和42例HCQ/AZ患者。虽然在配对前转入ICU和/或退出治疗组之间存在统计学差异(p=0.031),但经倾向分析后,这一差异无统计学意义(p=0.250)。FAV患者比HCQ/AZ组多住院近1天,但差异无统计学意义(9.02天vs 8.14天,p=0.903)。两组在放电时AST、ALT和LDH水平均升高,其中FAV组的升高幅度最大。结论:FAV治疗肺炎住院患者COVID-19感染的效果不优于HCQ/AZ。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Medica Mediterranea
Acta Medica Mediterranea 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Medica Mediterranea is an indipendent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal, online and open-access, designed for internists and phisicians. The journal publishes a variety of manuscript types, including review articles, original research, case reports and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Older patients’ driving safety with the help of DRIVING SIMULATOR: Which cognitive test can predict better driving safety? Evaluation of the results of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma injections in patients with knee osteoarthritis Low-grade glial tumors: The experience of an oncology hospital in Türkiye High 30-day readmission rates in hospitalized patients with heart failure: Strengthening the need for a multidisciplinary and integrated approach Malignancy and Sarcoidosis: A Single Center Experience from Turkey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1