No secrets between the two of us: Privacy concerns over using AI agents.

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Cyberpsychology-Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace Pub Date : 2022-09-19 DOI:10.5817/cp2022-4-3
Sohye Lim, Hongjin Shim
{"title":"No secrets between the two of us: Privacy concerns over using AI agents.","authors":"Sohye Lim, Hongjin Shim","doi":"10.5817/cp2022-4-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The diverse spread of artificial intelligence (AI) agents provides evidence of the most notable changes in the current media landscape. AI agents mostly function based on voluntary and involuntary sharing of users’ personal information. Accordingly, users’ privacy concerns have become key to understanding the varied psychological responses towards AI agents. In this study, we adopt the “computers are social actors” paradigm to identify the association between a set of relational variables—intimacy, para-social interactions, and social presence—and privacy concerns and to determine whether a user’s motivations moderate this relationship. The results from an online survey (N = 562) revealed that this occurs primarily to gratify three AI agent user needs: entertainment motivation, instrumental motivation, and passing time. The results also confirmed that social presence and intimacy significantly influence users’ privacy concerns. These results support the moderating effect of both entertainment and instrumental motivation on the relationship between intimacy, para-social interaction, social presence, and privacy concerns about using AI agents. Further implications for privacy concerns in the context of AI-mediated communications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46651,"journal":{"name":"Cyberpsychology-Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cyberpsychology-Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/cp2022-4-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The diverse spread of artificial intelligence (AI) agents provides evidence of the most notable changes in the current media landscape. AI agents mostly function based on voluntary and involuntary sharing of users’ personal information. Accordingly, users’ privacy concerns have become key to understanding the varied psychological responses towards AI agents. In this study, we adopt the “computers are social actors” paradigm to identify the association between a set of relational variables—intimacy, para-social interactions, and social presence—and privacy concerns and to determine whether a user’s motivations moderate this relationship. The results from an online survey (N = 562) revealed that this occurs primarily to gratify three AI agent user needs: entertainment motivation, instrumental motivation, and passing time. The results also confirmed that social presence and intimacy significantly influence users’ privacy concerns. These results support the moderating effect of both entertainment and instrumental motivation on the relationship between intimacy, para-social interaction, social presence, and privacy concerns about using AI agents. Further implications for privacy concerns in the context of AI-mediated communications are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们之间没有秘密:使用人工智能代理的隐私问题。
人工智能(AI)代理的多样化传播为当前媒体格局最显著的变化提供了证据。人工智能代理大多基于自愿和非自愿分享用户的个人信息。因此,用户对隐私的担忧已成为理解对人工智能代理的各种心理反应的关键。在本研究中,我们采用“计算机是社会行动者”范式来识别一组关系变量(亲密、准社会互动和社会存在)与隐私关注之间的关联,并确定用户动机是否调节了这种关系。一项在线调查(N = 562)的结果显示,这主要是为了满足AI代理用户的三种需求:娱乐动机、工具动机和打发时间。结果还证实,社交存在和亲密关系显著影响用户的隐私问题。这些结果支持娱乐和工具动机对使用人工智能代理的亲密关系、准社会互动、社会存在和隐私担忧之间关系的调节作用。讨论了在人工智能介导的通信背景下对隐私问题的进一步影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
6.90%
发文量
39
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊最新文献
The relationship between preference for online social interaction and affective well-being via compulsive dating app use: The moderating role of algorithmic beliefs The psychological impacts of content moderation on content moderators: A qualitative study Online pornography use and sexual satisfaction in association with relationship satisfaction among middle-aged and older people Facebook, social comparison and happiness: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment User experience of mixed reality applications for healthy ageing: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1