Takyif Fiqhi on the Permissibility of Ijarah Mawsufah fi al-Dhimmah: A Critical Analysis

Abu Umar Faruq Ahmad, Abu Talib Mohammad Monawer, L. Olorogun
{"title":"Takyif Fiqhi on the Permissibility of Ijarah Mawsufah fi al-Dhimmah: A Critical Analysis","authors":"Abu Umar Faruq Ahmad, Abu Talib Mohammad Monawer, L. Olorogun","doi":"10.24035/ijit.17.2020.165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ijarah mawsufah fi al-dhimmah (hereinafter referred to as IMAD), also known as forward ijarah ̧ is an Islamic financial product that involves the sale of an identified asset currently being produced or constructed for a future delivery such as a property, office, factory, and so forth. In the classical fiqh literature, it has been discussed under the general purview of leasing and forward sale contracts. However, in the context of modern Islamic finance practice Islamic banks and financial institutions have upheld its usage as an independent financial instrument. The contemporary scholars claim that except for Hanafi, other key fiqh schools consider IMAD as an Islamic financial product. The study is an attempt to prove that such a claim is merely based on assumption. Besides, it is motivated by lack of holistic study of Hanafi’s original reference books. The methodology chosen for this study is content analysis of the relevant published literatures. The study finds that no classical scholars including those of Hanafi school of thought were in disagreement so far over the IMAD to consider it as an independent and standalone Islamic finance product. The study aims at reconciling scholars’ different views on the issue of IMAD for its wider acceptance.","PeriodicalId":40258,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Islamic Thought","volume":"76 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Islamic Thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24035/ijit.17.2020.165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Ijarah mawsufah fi al-dhimmah (hereinafter referred to as IMAD), also known as forward ijarah ̧ is an Islamic financial product that involves the sale of an identified asset currently being produced or constructed for a future delivery such as a property, office, factory, and so forth. In the classical fiqh literature, it has been discussed under the general purview of leasing and forward sale contracts. However, in the context of modern Islamic finance practice Islamic banks and financial institutions have upheld its usage as an independent financial instrument. The contemporary scholars claim that except for Hanafi, other key fiqh schools consider IMAD as an Islamic financial product. The study is an attempt to prove that such a claim is merely based on assumption. Besides, it is motivated by lack of holistic study of Hanafi’s original reference books. The methodology chosen for this study is content analysis of the relevant published literatures. The study finds that no classical scholars including those of Hanafi school of thought were in disagreement so far over the IMAD to consider it as an independent and standalone Islamic finance product. The study aims at reconciling scholars’ different views on the issue of IMAD for its wider acceptance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Takyif Fiqhi关于Ijarah Mawsufah fi al-Dhimmah的容许性:一个批判性的分析
Ijarah mawsufah fi al-dhimmah(以下简称IMAD),也称为远期Ijarah -dhimmah,是一种伊斯兰金融产品,涉及出售目前正在生产或建造的确定资产,以供未来交付,如房产、办公室、工厂等。在经典的fiqh文献中,它已经在租赁和远期销售合同的一般范围内进行了讨论。然而,在现代伊斯兰金融实践的背景下,伊斯兰银行和金融机构坚持将其作为独立的金融工具使用。当代学者声称,除了哈纳菲,其他主要伊斯兰教学派都认为IMAD是伊斯兰教的金融产品。这项研究试图证明这样的说法仅仅是基于假设。此外,缺乏对哈纳菲原始参考书的全面研究也是其动机之一。本研究选择的方法是对相关已发表的文献进行内容分析。研究发现,迄今为止,包括哈纳菲学派在内的古典学者都没有对IMAD作为一个独立的、独立的伊斯兰金融产品持不同意见。本研究旨在调和学者对IMAD问题的不同看法,使其得到更广泛的接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ahmad Dahlan and the Moderate, Humanist, and Non-Sectarian Islam Technological Integration within Zakat Institutions: A Comprehensive Review and Prospective Research Directions The Mid-Century Model of Critical Thinking: Shah Wali Allah Al-Dihlawi “Beyond Jihad”: The Islamic Contributions to the Field of Strategic Studies The Influence of Islamic Culture on Maimonides in the Development of Mishnah’s Legislation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1