Injector Design Plays an Important Role In Maximisation of CO2 Trapping in Geological Formations

P. Chidambaram, P. A. Patil, P. Tiwari, D. Das, R. Tewari
{"title":"Injector Design Plays an Important Role In Maximisation of CO2 Trapping in Geological Formations","authors":"P. Chidambaram, P. A. Patil, P. Tiwari, D. Das, R. Tewari","doi":"10.4043/31425-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Storing CO2 in geological formations is gaining greater importance as various companies start transitioning towards a carbon neutral future. CO2 storage in depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs and saline aquifers is considered an effective and secure option to reduce atmospheric CO2. Once underground, four different mechanisms keep the supercritical CO2 securely stored. The mechanisms, in increasing order of storage security are, 1. Structural/stratigraphic trapping, 2. Residual trapping, 3. Solubility trapping, and 4. Mineral trapping. Optimization of injector design to increase the amount of CO2 trapped in one of the more secure mechanisms is desirable.\n Structural trapping is the most dominant and least secure trapping mechanism for CO2 storage. Any opportunity to move structurally trapped CO2 into one of the other trapping mechanisms is preferable from the standpoint of storage security. Mechanistic models are used to study ways to improve amount of CO2 trapped by certain mechanisms. Residual trapping is affected by several factors including path traveled from perforation to the top of the structure. Similarly, solubility trapping is influenced by several factors including the amount of contact CO2 has with water. Injected CO2, due to buoyancy, rapidly rises to the top of the structure. There is potential to increase residual trapping and solubility trapping by optimizing the injector design to increase volume of reservoir contacted by CO2.\n Mechanistic modeling study shows that residual trapped and solubility trapped CO2 volume can be increased by optimizing injector design. There is up to 50% improvement observed in both trapping mechanisms depending on the reservoir characteristics and injector design. Interestingly, lower permeability reservoirs are more sensitive to injector design compared to higher permeability reservoirs. Of the injector designs studied, horizontal injectors placed at the bottom of the structure show the most improvement in both residual and solubility trapping mechanisms. Pressure of the reservoir also influences trapping mechanisms. At higher reservoir pressures, density difference between CO2 and water is smaller. This affects how CO2 plume migrates in the reservoir.","PeriodicalId":11011,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, March 24, 2022","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, March 24, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/31425-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Storing CO2 in geological formations is gaining greater importance as various companies start transitioning towards a carbon neutral future. CO2 storage in depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs and saline aquifers is considered an effective and secure option to reduce atmospheric CO2. Once underground, four different mechanisms keep the supercritical CO2 securely stored. The mechanisms, in increasing order of storage security are, 1. Structural/stratigraphic trapping, 2. Residual trapping, 3. Solubility trapping, and 4. Mineral trapping. Optimization of injector design to increase the amount of CO2 trapped in one of the more secure mechanisms is desirable. Structural trapping is the most dominant and least secure trapping mechanism for CO2 storage. Any opportunity to move structurally trapped CO2 into one of the other trapping mechanisms is preferable from the standpoint of storage security. Mechanistic models are used to study ways to improve amount of CO2 trapped by certain mechanisms. Residual trapping is affected by several factors including path traveled from perforation to the top of the structure. Similarly, solubility trapping is influenced by several factors including the amount of contact CO2 has with water. Injected CO2, due to buoyancy, rapidly rises to the top of the structure. There is potential to increase residual trapping and solubility trapping by optimizing the injector design to increase volume of reservoir contacted by CO2. Mechanistic modeling study shows that residual trapped and solubility trapped CO2 volume can be increased by optimizing injector design. There is up to 50% improvement observed in both trapping mechanisms depending on the reservoir characteristics and injector design. Interestingly, lower permeability reservoirs are more sensitive to injector design compared to higher permeability reservoirs. Of the injector designs studied, horizontal injectors placed at the bottom of the structure show the most improvement in both residual and solubility trapping mechanisms. Pressure of the reservoir also influences trapping mechanisms. At higher reservoir pressures, density difference between CO2 and water is smaller. This affects how CO2 plume migrates in the reservoir.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
注入器设计在地质构造中最大限度地捕获二氧化碳方面起着重要作用
随着各种公司开始向碳中和的未来过渡,在地质构造中储存二氧化碳变得越来越重要。在枯竭的油气储层和含盐含水层中储存二氧化碳被认为是减少大气二氧化碳的有效和安全的选择。一旦进入地下,有四种不同的机制将超临界二氧化碳安全地储存起来。按照存储安全性的递增顺序,其机制是:1。2.构造/地层圈闭;残留诱捕,3。溶解度捕获,4。矿物捕获。优化喷油器设计,增加在一个更安全的机制中捕获的二氧化碳量是可取的。结构捕集是CO2封存中最主要、最不安全的捕集机制。从储存安全的角度来看,任何将结构上捕获的二氧化碳转移到其他捕获机制之一的机会都是可取的。机制模型是用来研究通过某些机制来提高二氧化碳捕获量的方法。剩余的圈闭受到几个因素的影响,包括从射孔到结构顶部的路径。同样,溶解度捕获受几个因素的影响,包括CO2与水的接触量。注入的二氧化碳,由于浮力,迅速上升到结构的顶部。通过优化注入器设计,增加与CO2接触的储层体积,有可能增加残余捕集和溶解度捕集。机理模拟研究表明,通过优化注入器设计,可以增加剩余捕获和溶解度捕获CO2的体积。根据油藏特征和注入器设计,两种捕集机制的效率都提高了50%。有趣的是,与高渗透油藏相比,低渗透油藏对注入器设计更为敏感。在所研究的注入器设计中,位于结构底部的水平注入器在残余和溶解度捕获机制方面都表现出最大的改善。储层压力也会影响圈闭机制。在较高的储层压力下,CO2和水之间的密度差较小。这影响了二氧化碳羽流在储层中的迁移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrated Advance Petrophysical Evaluation for Heterolithic Clastics Reservoir Characterization Optimization in Malay Basin The Transformation Journey and Key Critical Success Factors of Turbomachinery Digital Remote Monitoring Biggest Wells Plug and Abandonment Campaign – Effective Management & Best Practices Implementation Zawtika Deferment Management Enhancement: A Systematic Way to Unlock Gas Potential for Optimized Operations Breakthrough Integration of 3-1/2? Tubing in 8-1/2? Hole Cemented Monobore for Successful Tubing Stem Test TST
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1