Bioethics: Ethico-Centric Interdisciplinarity

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Quaestiones Disputatae Pub Date : 2015-04-19 DOI:10.5840/QD20155218
E. Brugger
{"title":"Bioethics: Ethico-Centric Interdisciplinarity","authors":"E. Brugger","doi":"10.5840/QD20155218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When scholars over the past forty years have proposed definitions of ‘bioethics,’ they have usually addressed the question in terms of methodology:1 do we start with an analytical framework of abstract principles (Beauchamp and Childress),2 or the particularities of individual cases (John Arras, Jonsen and Toulmin);3 do we follow a neo-Kantian method (Alan Donagan),4 a more explicitly Christian approach,5 a narrative-based approach,6 a utilitarian,7 or","PeriodicalId":40384,"journal":{"name":"Quaestiones Disputatae","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaestiones Disputatae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/QD20155218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

When scholars over the past forty years have proposed definitions of ‘bioethics,’ they have usually addressed the question in terms of methodology:1 do we start with an analytical framework of abstract principles (Beauchamp and Childress),2 or the particularities of individual cases (John Arras, Jonsen and Toulmin);3 do we follow a neo-Kantian method (Alan Donagan),4 a more explicitly Christian approach,5 a narrative-based approach,6 a utilitarian,7 or
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生命伦理学:以伦理学为中心的跨学科
过去四十年来,当学者们提出“生命伦理学”的定义时,他们通常从方法论的角度来解决这个问题:1、我们是从抽象原则的分析框架(比尚和柴尔德里斯)开始,2、还是从个案的特殊性(约翰·阿拉斯、琼森和图尔敏)开始;3、我们是遵循新康德主义的方法(艾伦·多纳根)、4、更明确的基督教方法、5、基于叙事的方法、6、功利主义的方法、7或
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Quaestiones Disputatae
Quaestiones Disputatae HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Remnants of Substances: A Neo-Aristotelian Resolution of the Puzzles After Survivalism and Corruptionism: Separated Souls as Incomplete Persons Evaluating Hylomorphism as a Hybrid Account of Personal Identity Editor’s Introduction Saint Thomas Aquinas and the Too-Many-Thinkers Problem
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1