Evaluation of the INTERGROWTH-21st Fetal Growth Standards in the United Arab Emirates: A Pilot Study.

Biruk Hassib Narchi, Lolowa A. Almekhaini, Muna N. Alshekaili, Fatema Alshibli, S. Hamad, Ruwaya Aldhaheri, A. Souid
{"title":"Evaluation of the INTERGROWTH-21st Fetal Growth Standards in the United Arab Emirates: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Biruk Hassib Narchi, Lolowa A. Almekhaini, Muna N. Alshekaili, Fatema Alshibli, S. Hamad, Ruwaya Aldhaheri, A. Souid","doi":"10.35248/2167-0420.20.9.495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To evaluate the use of recently published INTERGROWTH-21st (IG-21) fetal growth standards in United Arab Emirates native population. Method: This prospective cohort study analyzed fetal ultrasound measurements of head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length. Z-scores and percentiles of fetal and neonatal growth measurements were calculated using IG-21 and compared with a standard reference. Results: Measurements were performed in 120 pregnancies at a median gestational age of 25.8 weeks (range, 16 to 35). Thirteen out of 15 mean IG-21 Z-scores for all measurements remained between −0.5 and +0.5 at all gestational-ages. Actual standard deviations (SD) using IG-21 charts gave an acceptable SD (0.8 to 1.2) for 13 out of 15 measurements. The proportions of most antenatal measurements 90th and >97th percentiles were identical between standard and IG-21st charts. The median gestational age was 39 weeks (range, 29 to 41) and 14 (13%) were delivered by cesarean section. The mean z-scores of all biometric measurements were close to zero while the mean percentiles were close to the 50th percentile, thus, describing appropriately the neonatal growth parameters in our population. Conclusions: Fetal size in our population was comparable to the IG-21 standards. The IG-21 neonatal growth standards were more similar to that of the anticipated population distribution than to the standard charts. These preliminary results, if confirmed in a larger study in the UAE, would support use of IG-21 standards in UAE instead of the currently used standard charts.","PeriodicalId":93471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health care and management","volume":"13 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health care and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2167-0420.20.9.495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the use of recently published INTERGROWTH-21st (IG-21) fetal growth standards in United Arab Emirates native population. Method: This prospective cohort study analyzed fetal ultrasound measurements of head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length. Z-scores and percentiles of fetal and neonatal growth measurements were calculated using IG-21 and compared with a standard reference. Results: Measurements were performed in 120 pregnancies at a median gestational age of 25.8 weeks (range, 16 to 35). Thirteen out of 15 mean IG-21 Z-scores for all measurements remained between −0.5 and +0.5 at all gestational-ages. Actual standard deviations (SD) using IG-21 charts gave an acceptable SD (0.8 to 1.2) for 13 out of 15 measurements. The proportions of most antenatal measurements 90th and >97th percentiles were identical between standard and IG-21st charts. The median gestational age was 39 weeks (range, 29 to 41) and 14 (13%) were delivered by cesarean section. The mean z-scores of all biometric measurements were close to zero while the mean percentiles were close to the 50th percentile, thus, describing appropriately the neonatal growth parameters in our population. Conclusions: Fetal size in our population was comparable to the IG-21 standards. The IG-21 neonatal growth standards were more similar to that of the anticipated population distribution than to the standard charts. These preliminary results, if confirmed in a larger study in the UAE, would support use of IG-21 standards in UAE instead of the currently used standard charts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
intergrowth -21胎儿生长标准在阿联酋的评价:一项试点研究。
目的:评价最近发布的intergrowth -21 (IG-21)胎儿生长标准在阿联酋本地人群中的使用情况。方法:本前瞻性队列研究分析胎儿超声测量的头围、腹围和股骨长度。使用IG-21计算胎儿和新生儿生长测量的z分数和百分位数,并与标准参考进行比较。结果:对120例中位胎龄为25.8周(16 ~ 35周)的孕妇进行了测量。在所有孕龄的15例中,13例的所有测量结果的平均IG-21 z分数保持在- 0.5和+0.5之间。使用IG-21图表的实际标准偏差(SD)给出了15个测量中的13个可接受的SD(0.8到1.2)。大多数产前测量的第90百分位和>97百分位的比例在标准图和ig -21图之间相同。中位胎龄为39周(范围29 ~ 41周),14例(13%)为剖宫产。所有生物特征测量的平均z分数接近于零,而平均百分位数接近于第50百分位数,因此,适当地描述了我们人群中的新生儿生长参数。结论:我们人群的胎儿大小与IG-21标准相当。IG-21新生儿生长标准更接近于预期的人口分布,而不是标准图表。这些初步结果,如果在阿联酋进行的更大规模研究中得到证实,将支持在阿联酋使用IG-21标准,而不是目前使用的标准图表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exclusive breastfeeding practice and its associated factors among mothers with infants aged less than six months in Nono, Western Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study The Intricate Interactions between Maternal Smoking and Drinking During Pregnancy and Birthweight Z-Scores of Preterm Births. Utilization of Long Acting and Permanent Contraceptive Methods and Associated Factors among Married Women of Reproductive Age Group in Goba Town, Southeast Ethiopia Trend Analysis of Malaria Prevalence in East Wollega Zone, Oromia Regional State, Western Ethiopia, 2020: A Retrospective Study Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Infection Prevention among Health Care Workers in Public Health Facilities in West Guji Zone, Oromia,Ethiopia, 2018
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1