Old conflict, new perspective: Power shift in the news from Gaza

Q2 Social Sciences World of Media Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.30547/WORLDOFMEDIA.4.2018.2
I. Raja
{"title":"Old conflict, new perspective: Power shift in the news from Gaza","authors":"I. Raja","doi":"10.30547/WORLDOFMEDIA.4.2018.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study draws upon in-depth interviews conducted with the leading scholars, journalists, anti-war campaigners and peace activists commissioning the new media tools including Skype. Notably, it brings about eye-witness accounts of the Gaza conflict as some of the participants have survived the Israeli assault on aid-ship Freedom Flotilla (Mavi Marmara). In this sense, it offers firsthand descriptions and the experience of consuming and resisting new media technologies. This analysis shows that most journalists are compelled to be cautious in reporting Israeli actions inside the occupied territory (Gaza). Further, media coverage of Gaza reflects a disproportionate reporting because most sections of the mainstream media include soundbites and opinions of writers that endorse the Israeli government propaganda. In contrast, the evidence shows that media systematically excludes the progressive voices including the Jewish scholars and campaigners. Thus, too often, news emerging from Gaza mainly through the mainstream media is either biased or manufactured. This state of affairs stimulates ordinary people; be they peace activists, campaigners, or scholars to make use of alternative means of communications and news dissemination that is the new media. However, this study finds that new media has transformed the Gaza conflict to an extent that Europe has more Palestinian sympathizers than ever before. Despite, perceptible progress and achievement, the new media is facing a threat that comes from the powerful political elites and the large media corporation. Arguably, new media sites such as Facebook, Whatsapp, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube are icons on a Corresponding author: Irfan Raja, NUST University, School of Social Sciences and Humanities, S3H, Sector, H-12, Islamabad, Pakistan. Email: Irfan.journalist@gmail.com","PeriodicalId":36142,"journal":{"name":"World of Media","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World of Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30547/WORLDOFMEDIA.4.2018.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study draws upon in-depth interviews conducted with the leading scholars, journalists, anti-war campaigners and peace activists commissioning the new media tools including Skype. Notably, it brings about eye-witness accounts of the Gaza conflict as some of the participants have survived the Israeli assault on aid-ship Freedom Flotilla (Mavi Marmara). In this sense, it offers firsthand descriptions and the experience of consuming and resisting new media technologies. This analysis shows that most journalists are compelled to be cautious in reporting Israeli actions inside the occupied territory (Gaza). Further, media coverage of Gaza reflects a disproportionate reporting because most sections of the mainstream media include soundbites and opinions of writers that endorse the Israeli government propaganda. In contrast, the evidence shows that media systematically excludes the progressive voices including the Jewish scholars and campaigners. Thus, too often, news emerging from Gaza mainly through the mainstream media is either biased or manufactured. This state of affairs stimulates ordinary people; be they peace activists, campaigners, or scholars to make use of alternative means of communications and news dissemination that is the new media. However, this study finds that new media has transformed the Gaza conflict to an extent that Europe has more Palestinian sympathizers than ever before. Despite, perceptible progress and achievement, the new media is facing a threat that comes from the powerful political elites and the large media corporation. Arguably, new media sites such as Facebook, Whatsapp, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube are icons on a Corresponding author: Irfan Raja, NUST University, School of Social Sciences and Humanities, S3H, Sector, H-12, Islamabad, Pakistan. Email: Irfan.journalist@gmail.com
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
旧冲突,新视角:加沙新闻中的权力转移
本研究对使用包括Skype在内的新媒体工具的知名学者、记者、反战人士和和平活动家进行了深入访谈。值得注意的是,它带来了加沙冲突的目击者叙述,因为一些参与者在以色列袭击援助船“自由舰队”(“蓝色马尔马拉”号)时幸存下来。从这个意义上说,它提供了消费和抵制新媒体技术的第一手描述和经验。这一分析表明,大多数记者在报道以色列在被占领土(加沙)内的行动时不得不谨慎。此外,媒体对加沙的报道反映了一种不成比例的报道,因为主流媒体的大多数部分都包括支持以色列政府宣传的作家的声音和观点。相反,有证据表明,媒体系统地排除了包括犹太学者和活动家在内的进步声音。因此,主要通过主流媒体从加沙传来的新闻往往是有偏见的或捏造的。这种状况刺激了普通人;无论是和平活动家,活动家还是学者,他们都可以利用新媒体作为交流和新闻传播的替代手段。然而,这项研究发现,新媒体已经在一定程度上改变了加沙冲突,欧洲比以往任何时候都有更多的巴勒斯坦同情者。尽管取得了明显的进步和成就,但新媒体正面临着来自强大的政治精英和大型媒体公司的威胁。可以说,Facebook, Whatsapp, Twitter, Instagram和YouTube等新媒体网站是一个图标。通讯作者:Irfan Raja, NUST大学,社会科学与人文学院,S3H, Sector, H-12,伊斯兰堡,巴基斯坦。电子邮件:Irfan.journalist@gmail.com
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World of Media
World of Media Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Framing economic crisis: Newspaper coverage during COVID-19 in Bangladesh Perception of environmental information materials by youth audiences: Results of a neuromarketing study Public and private media coverage of the military coup in Zimbabwe Headlines and misinformation in the Nigerian newspapers: Evidence from herder-farmer crisis and ENDSARS protests The Greek ‘success story’ on the international media representations concerning the pandemic of COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1