Treatment of Acetabular Defects with Porous Metal Augments in Revision Hip Surgery

Prilozi Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI:10.2478/prilozi-2019-0012
Jasmin Ciriviri, Zoran Nestorovski, Darko Talevski, Tode Vranishkovski, Hristijan Kostov
{"title":"Treatment of Acetabular Defects with Porous Metal Augments in Revision Hip Surgery","authors":"Jasmin Ciriviri, Zoran Nestorovski, Darko Talevski, Tode Vranishkovski, Hristijan Kostov","doi":"10.2478/prilozi-2019-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Porous metal augments have been used successfully for management of large acetabular defects during revision hip arthroplasty. This study analyzes and compares the clinical and radiographic outcomes of porous metal augments in cemented and uncemented acetabular revisions, all performed at the same institution. In the period 2015-2017, 36 patients with 37 large acetabular defects were treated with porous metal augments in cemented and uncemented acetabular revisions. Postoperatively, patients were monitored for two years on average period of 24-36 months. Acetabular augments were used when preoperative and intraoperative findings indicated the presence of large acetabular defects that can hinder the stability of the revision implants. We used lateral approach, 36 mm femoral head, and cementless or cemented acetabular cup depending on local bone quality. Postoperatively, all patients followed total hip arthroplasty precautions, with weight bearing as tolerated regimen with use of crutches during 6 weeks after surgery. The follow-up was radiological and clinical. We used HHS. At a mean follow-up of two years (range 24-36 months) one patient had reinfection and one patient had infection. None of the patients shown signs of aseptic augment or acetabular cup loosening. Porous metal augments show comparable excellent radiographic and clinical short-term outcomes, when combined with cemented or uncemented cups in revision hip arthroplasty. They allow good bone ingrowth, adequate implant contact and good stability. Complications were related to infection and not related to the augments itself.","PeriodicalId":87202,"journal":{"name":"Prilozi","volume":"52 1","pages":"33 - 39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prilozi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/prilozi-2019-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Porous metal augments have been used successfully for management of large acetabular defects during revision hip arthroplasty. This study analyzes and compares the clinical and radiographic outcomes of porous metal augments in cemented and uncemented acetabular revisions, all performed at the same institution. In the period 2015-2017, 36 patients with 37 large acetabular defects were treated with porous metal augments in cemented and uncemented acetabular revisions. Postoperatively, patients were monitored for two years on average period of 24-36 months. Acetabular augments were used when preoperative and intraoperative findings indicated the presence of large acetabular defects that can hinder the stability of the revision implants. We used lateral approach, 36 mm femoral head, and cementless or cemented acetabular cup depending on local bone quality. Postoperatively, all patients followed total hip arthroplasty precautions, with weight bearing as tolerated regimen with use of crutches during 6 weeks after surgery. The follow-up was radiological and clinical. We used HHS. At a mean follow-up of two years (range 24-36 months) one patient had reinfection and one patient had infection. None of the patients shown signs of aseptic augment or acetabular cup loosening. Porous metal augments show comparable excellent radiographic and clinical short-term outcomes, when combined with cemented or uncemented cups in revision hip arthroplasty. They allow good bone ingrowth, adequate implant contact and good stability. Complications were related to infection and not related to the augments itself.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多孔金属增强物在髋关节翻修手术中治疗髋臼缺损
多孔金属增强物已成功用于髋关节置换术中髋臼大缺损的修复。本研究分析并比较了多孔金属增强物在骨水泥和非骨水泥髋臼翻修中的临床和影像学结果,所有这些都是在同一机构进行的。在2015-2017年期间,36例37个大髋臼缺损患者在骨水泥和非骨水泥髋臼翻修中采用多孔金属增强物治疗。术后随访2年,平均24-36个月。当术前和术中发现存在较大的髋臼缺损会影响翻修植入物的稳定性时,使用髋臼增强物。我们采用外侧入路,36mm股骨头,根据局部骨质量使用无骨水泥或骨水泥的髋臼杯。术后,所有患者均遵循全髋关节置换术注意事项,术后6周内,负重为可耐受方案,使用拐杖。随访包括放射学和临床。我们用了HHS。平均随访2年(24-36个月),1例患者再次感染,1例患者感染。没有患者表现出无菌性增强或髋臼杯松动的迹象。在翻修髋关节置换术中,当与骨水泥或非骨水泥杯联合使用时,多孔金属增强物显示出相当优异的影像学和临床短期效果。它们允许良好的骨长入,足够的种植体接触和良好的稳定性。并发症与感染有关,而与增加物本身无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prophylactic Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces in Elective Lower Limb Amputations Continuous Peripheral Block as a Pain Treatment for Redressment and Physical Therapy in a 7-Year-Old Child – A Case Report Childbirth-Related Psychological Trauma Author’s Response to Letter to the Editor: Is Opioid-Free General Anesthesia More Superior for Postoperative Pain Versus Opioid General Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy? Inflammatory Bowel Diseases in Renal Transplantat Recipients: A Case Series and Review of the Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1