In the World Republic of Letters: Towards a Reconceptualisation of the Notion of Weltliteratur

Q1 Arts and Humanities Studia Litteraria et Historica Pub Date : 2022-12-29 DOI:10.4467/20843933st.22.025.17191
K. Piotrowski
{"title":"In the World Republic of Letters: Towards a Reconceptualisation of the Notion of Weltliteratur","authors":"K. Piotrowski","doi":"10.4467/20843933st.22.025.17191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper problematises the origins, characteristics, and implications of the term Weltliteratur, proffering critical insights into its interdisciplinary, transnational character and presuppositions about its discontinuous development. Having been initially conceptualised as a heretofore undeveloped research area, the domain of “world literature” is first eulogised as worthy of further scholarly attention by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe in the late 1820s – the time of political unrest and multiple socio-cultural changes. As such, the idea also seems to have been of paramount interest to the ancients (H. M. Posnett), in which sense it may be portrayed as borderline anachronistic. Conversely, it does possess and evoke great resonance in future writers, thinkers, and intellectuals alike, resulting in its many reconceptualisations, not only in the field of literary studies but also in numerous nascent or still-developing disciplines such as comparative literature, genology, translation criticism, hermeneutics, cultural studies; furthermore, it is equally relevant for a number of various thematic poetics.\n\nEngaging in a dialogue with Reinhart Koselleck’s “conceptual history” alongside its highly idiosyncratic theoretical apparatus, the present paper adapts and reappropriates Koselleck’s nomenclature with a view towards a preliminary systematisation of anticipatory mechanisms which influenced the reception of the category of Weltliteratur as much as they governed its subsequent re-development, be it in academia or in twentieth- and twenty-first-century public discourse. In this sense, Goethe’s prescient analysis of various national literatures as well as of the heterogeneity of artistic discourses of his time may be said to have laid the foundations for new comparative research methodologies, and, by extension, to what Pascale Casanova would eventually name as “the world republic of letters.”","PeriodicalId":30881,"journal":{"name":"Studia Litteraria et Historica","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Litteraria et Historica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/20843933st.22.025.17191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper problematises the origins, characteristics, and implications of the term Weltliteratur, proffering critical insights into its interdisciplinary, transnational character and presuppositions about its discontinuous development. Having been initially conceptualised as a heretofore undeveloped research area, the domain of “world literature” is first eulogised as worthy of further scholarly attention by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe in the late 1820s – the time of political unrest and multiple socio-cultural changes. As such, the idea also seems to have been of paramount interest to the ancients (H. M. Posnett), in which sense it may be portrayed as borderline anachronistic. Conversely, it does possess and evoke great resonance in future writers, thinkers, and intellectuals alike, resulting in its many reconceptualisations, not only in the field of literary studies but also in numerous nascent or still-developing disciplines such as comparative literature, genology, translation criticism, hermeneutics, cultural studies; furthermore, it is equally relevant for a number of various thematic poetics. Engaging in a dialogue with Reinhart Koselleck’s “conceptual history” alongside its highly idiosyncratic theoretical apparatus, the present paper adapts and reappropriates Koselleck’s nomenclature with a view towards a preliminary systematisation of anticipatory mechanisms which influenced the reception of the category of Weltliteratur as much as they governed its subsequent re-development, be it in academia or in twentieth- and twenty-first-century public discourse. In this sense, Goethe’s prescient analysis of various national literatures as well as of the heterogeneity of artistic discourses of his time may be said to have laid the foundations for new comparative research methodologies, and, by extension, to what Pascale Casanova would eventually name as “the world republic of letters.”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在世界文学共和国:走向世界文学概念的重新概念化
本文对“世界文学”一词的起源、特征和含义提出了问题,对其跨学科、跨国特征和不连续发展的前提提出了批判性见解。“世界文学”最初被定义为一个迄今尚未开发的研究领域,在19世纪20年代末,政治动荡和多种社会文化变化的时代,约翰·沃尔夫冈·冯·歌德首次称赞“世界文学”领域值得进一步的学术关注。就其本身而言,这个想法似乎对古人也有极大的兴趣(H. M. Posnett),从这个意义上说,它可能被描绘成一个边缘的时代错误。相反,它确实在未来的作家、思想家和知识分子中引起了巨大的共鸣,导致它的许多重新概念化,不仅在文学研究领域,而且在许多新兴或仍在发展的学科,如比较文学、系谱学、翻译批评、解释学、文化研究;此外,它同样适用于许多不同的主题诗学。与莱因哈特·科塞莱克(Reinhart Koselleck)的“概念史”及其高度特殊的理论工具进行对话,本论文改编并重新利用了科塞莱克的命名法,以期对预期机制进行初步系统化,这些机制影响了对世界文学类别的接受,就像它们统治了随后的重新发展一样,无论是在学术界还是在20世纪和21世纪的公共话语中。从这个意义上说,歌德对不同民族文学的先见之明的分析,以及对他那个时代艺术话语的异质性的分析,可以说为新的比较研究方法奠定了基础,并由此延伸,为帕斯卡·卡萨诺瓦最终命名的“世界文学共和国”奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Litteraria et Historica
Studia Litteraria et Historica Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Környezet és humántudomány Fürjek és akácok Táj és ember viszonya Az egerek népétől a geometriai progresszióig Földút haza?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1