Development and validation of the Positive Bisexual Identity (PBI) scale

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychology & Sexuality Pub Date : 2022-03-23 DOI:10.1080/19419899.2022.2057868
A. C. de Barros, T. Morrison
{"title":"Development and validation of the Positive Bisexual Identity (PBI) scale","authors":"A. C. de Barros, T. Morrison","doi":"10.1080/19419899.2022.2057868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Positive sexual minority identity is a vital point of investigation for bisexual individuals. However, no measure currently exists that specifically examines positive sexual identity in bisexual people, whose experiences differ from those of gay men and lesbian women. These three studies outline the development, refinement, and validation of a measure of positive bisexual identity. In Study 1, participants completed an initial pool of items and a validation measure. A principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted for item reduction. Studies 2 and 3 investigated the Positive Bisexual Identity (PBI) measure’s scale-score reliability and dimensionality using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The construct validity of the PBI scale also was tested using measures expected to correlate with positive bisexual identity. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients and Omega coefficients provided support for scale score reliability, and the proposed nomological network offered support for the PBI’s construct validity. Our findings elucidate potential differences between positive bisexual identity and positive gay/lesbian identity. The PBI has potential as a scale that can be used to measure positive bisexual identity in both research and clinical settings.","PeriodicalId":51686,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Sexuality","volume":"18 1","pages":"73 - 93"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2022.2057868","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Positive sexual minority identity is a vital point of investigation for bisexual individuals. However, no measure currently exists that specifically examines positive sexual identity in bisexual people, whose experiences differ from those of gay men and lesbian women. These three studies outline the development, refinement, and validation of a measure of positive bisexual identity. In Study 1, participants completed an initial pool of items and a validation measure. A principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted for item reduction. Studies 2 and 3 investigated the Positive Bisexual Identity (PBI) measure’s scale-score reliability and dimensionality using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The construct validity of the PBI scale also was tested using measures expected to correlate with positive bisexual identity. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients and Omega coefficients provided support for scale score reliability, and the proposed nomological network offered support for the PBI’s construct validity. Our findings elucidate potential differences between positive bisexual identity and positive gay/lesbian identity. The PBI has potential as a scale that can be used to measure positive bisexual identity in both research and clinical settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
积极双性恋认同(PBI)量表的开发与验证
积极的性少数认同是双性恋个体调查的一个重要点。然而,目前还没有一种方法可以专门检验双性恋者的积极性身份,他们的经历与男同性恋和女同性恋不同。这三项研究概述了积极双性恋身份的发展、完善和验证。在研究1中,参与者完成了初始项目池和验证测量。采用主成分分析(PCA)进行项目缩减。研究2和研究3采用探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)对阳性双性恋认同(PBI)量表得分的信度和维度进行了研究。PBI量表的结构效度也被测试使用的措施预期与积极的双性恋身份相关。Cronbach的alpha系数和Omega系数为量表得分的信度提供了支持,所提出的法则网络为PBI的结构效度提供了支持。我们的研究结果阐明了积极的双性恋身份和积极的同性恋身份之间的潜在差异。在研究和临床环境中,PBI有潜力作为一种量表来衡量积极的双性恋身份。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychology & Sexuality
Psychology & Sexuality PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Prospective Effects of Resilience on Mental Health among Sexual and Gender Minority Young People. The role of faith in the experience of grief among sexually diverse individuals: a systematic review Do attitude functions and perceiver demographics predict attitudes towards asexuality? Holding hands: LGBTQ people’s experiences of public displays of affection with their partner(s) Changing beliefs about gender: the relation between contact with gender nonconforming individuals and gender essentialism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1