FOOD SELECTION AND USE OF SPACE BY DIDELPHIS PERNIGRA (DIDELPHIDAE: MAMMALIA) IN AN ANDEAN SUBURBAN ENVIRONMENT

IF 0.8 4区 生物学 Q4 PLANT SCIENCES Bothalia Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.15446/ABC.V25N3.77558
Gina Patricia Suárez Cáceres, Cristiano Adinolfi, Francisco Alejandro Sánchez Barrera
{"title":"FOOD SELECTION AND USE OF SPACE BY DIDELPHIS PERNIGRA (DIDELPHIDAE: MAMMALIA) IN AN ANDEAN SUBURBAN ENVIRONMENT","authors":"Gina Patricia Suárez Cáceres, Cristiano Adinolfi, Francisco Alejandro Sánchez Barrera","doi":"10.15446/ABC.V25N3.77558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cities have grown throughout the Andes and we know little about the ecology of those species that tolerate them, limiting our options to do conservation. We applied optimal foraging theory to examine the behavior of the Andean White-eared Opossum ( Didelphis pernigra ), in a suburban area in Bogota, Colombia. We used the giving-up density technique, which uses the amount of food left in a feeding patch, to evaluate whether the opossum’s foraging costs were affected by the height of food from the ground, and the quality and quantity of food. We also evaluated whether the spatial heterogeneity of the study site affected the opossum’s foraging. We used an artificial feeding patch to test these ideas. When food was either concentrated and, in less amount, (concentrated food) or diluted and more amount (diluted food), the opossums preferred to forage at 2 m than at 0.5 m, but concentrated food at 0.5 m was not significantly different from diluted food at 2 m. The opossums’ habitat use was affected by the spatial heterogeneity at the study site and animals preferred foraging along metal fences than on live fences made of trees. When a cable allowed connection between the metallic and live fences, the value of food patches at the live fence appeared to increase.  Thus, although the opossums need resources associated with natural environments, our results suggest that there are human modifications that can benefit them, such as those that reduce the risk of predation and favor their mobility in suburban environments.","PeriodicalId":55336,"journal":{"name":"Bothalia","volume":"2 1","pages":"368-373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bothalia","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15446/ABC.V25N3.77558","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Cities have grown throughout the Andes and we know little about the ecology of those species that tolerate them, limiting our options to do conservation. We applied optimal foraging theory to examine the behavior of the Andean White-eared Opossum ( Didelphis pernigra ), in a suburban area in Bogota, Colombia. We used the giving-up density technique, which uses the amount of food left in a feeding patch, to evaluate whether the opossum’s foraging costs were affected by the height of food from the ground, and the quality and quantity of food. We also evaluated whether the spatial heterogeneity of the study site affected the opossum’s foraging. We used an artificial feeding patch to test these ideas. When food was either concentrated and, in less amount, (concentrated food) or diluted and more amount (diluted food), the opossums preferred to forage at 2 m than at 0.5 m, but concentrated food at 0.5 m was not significantly different from diluted food at 2 m. The opossums’ habitat use was affected by the spatial heterogeneity at the study site and animals preferred foraging along metal fences than on live fences made of trees. When a cable allowed connection between the metallic and live fences, the value of food patches at the live fence appeared to increase.  Thus, although the opossums need resources associated with natural environments, our results suggest that there are human modifications that can benefit them, such as those that reduce the risk of predation and favor their mobility in suburban environments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安第斯近郊环境中佩尼迪蚤的食物选择和空间利用
城市遍布安第斯山脉,而我们对那些能忍受城市的物种的生态知之甚少,这限制了我们保护城市的选择。我们应用最优觅食理论研究了哥伦比亚波哥大郊区安第斯白耳负鼠(Didelphis pernigra)的行为。我们使用放弃密度技术,即利用在一个饲养斑块中剩余的食物量,来评估负鼠的觅食成本是否受到食物距离地面的高度、食物的质量和数量的影响。我们还评估了研究地点的空间异质性是否影响负鼠的觅食。我们使用人工喂养贴片来测试这些想法。当食物被浓缩而数量较少(浓缩食物)或被稀释而数量较多(稀释食物)时,负鼠倾向于在2 m处觅食,而不是在0.5 m处觅食,但0.5 m处的浓缩食物与2 m处的稀释食物没有显著差异。负鼠的生境利用受空间异质性的影响,它们更倾向于沿金属围栏觅食,而不是沿树木围栏觅食。当金属栅栏和带电栅栏之间有电缆连接时,带电栅栏上的食物块的价值似乎增加了。因此,尽管负鼠需要与自然环境相关的资源,但我们的研究结果表明,人类的改变可以使它们受益,例如降低被捕食的风险,并有利于它们在郊区环境中的流动性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bothalia
Bothalia 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Bothalia: African Biodiversity & Conservation is published by AOSIS for the South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) and aims to disseminate knowledge, information and innovative approaches that promote and enhance the wise use and management of biodiversity in order to sustain the systems and species that support and benefit the people of Africa. The journal was previously published as Bothalia, and had served the South African botanical community since 1921. However the expanded mandate of SANBI necessitated a broader scope for the journal, and in 2014, the subtitle, African Biodiversity & Conservation was added to reflect this change.
期刊最新文献
Impact of poaching on the population structure and insect associates of the Endangered Encephalartos eugene-maraisii from South Africa The relationship between mammalian burrow abundance and bankrupt bush (Seriphium plumosum) encroachment Urban intensity and flower community structure drive monkey beetle assemblage in Cape Town An online survey on user perceptions of natural science collections in South Africa Evolution of South African brambles (Rubus L.) – new insights from molecular markers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1