HEV Optimal Battery State of Charge Prediction: A Time Series Inspired Approach

Wisdom Enang
{"title":"HEV Optimal Battery State of Charge Prediction: A Time Series Inspired Approach","authors":"Wisdom Enang","doi":"10.4172/2167-7670.1000133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fuel efficiency in hybrid electric vehicles requires a fine balance between combustion engine usage and battery energy, using a carefully designed control algorithm. Owing to the transient nature of HEV dynamics, driving conditions prediction, have unavoidably become a vital part of HEV energy management. The use of vehicle onboard telematics for driving conditions prediction have been widely researched and documented in literature, with most of these studies identifying high equipment cost and lack of route information (for routes unfamiliar to the GPS) as factors currently impeding the commercialization of predictive HEV control using telematics. In view of this challenge, this study inspires a look-ahead HEV energy management approach, which uses time series predictors (neural networks or Markov chains), to forecast future battery state of charge, for a given horizon, along the optimal front (optimal battery state of charge trajectory). The primary contribution of this paper is a detailed theoretical appraisal and comparison of the neural network and Markov chain time series predictors over different driving scenarios (FTP72, SC03, ARTEMIS U130 and WLTC 3 driving cycles). Based on the analysis performed in this study, the following useful inferences are drawn: 1. Prediction accuracy decreases massively and disproportionately on average with increased prediction horizon for multi-input neural networks, 2. In a single-input/single-horizon prediction network, the performance of both the neural network and Markov chain predictors are similar and near optimal, with a mean absolute percentage error of less than 0.7% and a root mean square error of less than 0.6 for all driving cycles analysed, 3. Markov chains appeal as a promising time series predictor for online vehicular applications, as it impacts the relative advantage of high precision and moderate computation time.","PeriodicalId":7286,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Automobile Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Automobile Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-7670.1000133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fuel efficiency in hybrid electric vehicles requires a fine balance between combustion engine usage and battery energy, using a carefully designed control algorithm. Owing to the transient nature of HEV dynamics, driving conditions prediction, have unavoidably become a vital part of HEV energy management. The use of vehicle onboard telematics for driving conditions prediction have been widely researched and documented in literature, with most of these studies identifying high equipment cost and lack of route information (for routes unfamiliar to the GPS) as factors currently impeding the commercialization of predictive HEV control using telematics. In view of this challenge, this study inspires a look-ahead HEV energy management approach, which uses time series predictors (neural networks or Markov chains), to forecast future battery state of charge, for a given horizon, along the optimal front (optimal battery state of charge trajectory). The primary contribution of this paper is a detailed theoretical appraisal and comparison of the neural network and Markov chain time series predictors over different driving scenarios (FTP72, SC03, ARTEMIS U130 and WLTC 3 driving cycles). Based on the analysis performed in this study, the following useful inferences are drawn: 1. Prediction accuracy decreases massively and disproportionately on average with increased prediction horizon for multi-input neural networks, 2. In a single-input/single-horizon prediction network, the performance of both the neural network and Markov chain predictors are similar and near optimal, with a mean absolute percentage error of less than 0.7% and a root mean square error of less than 0.6 for all driving cycles analysed, 3. Markov chains appeal as a promising time series predictor for online vehicular applications, as it impacts the relative advantage of high precision and moderate computation time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合动力汽车电池最佳充电状态预测:一种时间序列启发的方法
混合动力汽车的燃油效率需要使用精心设计的控制算法,在内燃机使用和电池能量之间取得良好的平衡。由于混合动力汽车动力学的瞬态特性,驾驶工况预测不可避免地成为混合动力汽车能量管理的重要组成部分。使用车载远程信息处理技术进行驾驶条件预测已经得到了广泛的研究和文献记录,其中大多数研究都确定了设备成本高和缺乏路线信息(对于GPS不熟悉的路线)是目前阻碍使用远程信息处理技术预测混合动力汽车控制商业化的因素。鉴于这一挑战,本研究启发了一种前瞻性HEV能量管理方法,该方法使用时间序列预测器(神经网络或马尔可夫链),沿着最佳前沿(最佳电池充电状态轨迹)预测给定水平下的未来电池充电状态。本文的主要贡献是对不同驾驶场景(FTP72、SC03、ARTEMIS U130和WLTC 3驾驶循环)下的神经网络和马尔可夫链时间序列预测器进行了详细的理论评估和比较。根据本研究的分析,得出以下有益的推论:多输入神经网络的预测精度随着预测水平的增加而显著地、不成比例地下降。在单输入/单视界预测网络中,神经网络和马尔可夫链预测器的性能相似且接近最优,在分析的所有驾驶循环中,平均绝对百分比误差小于0.7%,均方根误差小于0.6。马尔可夫链具有精度高、计算时间适中的相对优势,是一种很有前途的时间序列预测方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predictive Model Based Low-Speed Adaptive Cruise Control for Autonomous Vehicles Global Electric Vehicles Market to Grapple with Economic Uncertainty in Near Term, Resurgence anticipated post-COVID-19 3D FE model for the acoustic analysis of an automotive muffler with glass wool A possible collision safer device for automobile vehicles Design of Energy-Absorbed Structures and Materials with Graded Configurations in the Automotive Body
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1