Nursing Students' Experiences of Virtual and Hybrid Simulation in Gerontological Nursing: A Mixed-Methods Study

Hyesoon Lee, M. Cho, Leeho Yoo, Eun-Yung Choi, D. Jung
{"title":"Nursing Students' Experiences of Virtual and Hybrid Simulation in Gerontological Nursing: A Mixed-Methods Study","authors":"Hyesoon Lee, M. Cho, Leeho Yoo, Eun-Yung Choi, D. Jung","doi":"10.17079/jkgn.2022.24.2.185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study aimed to examine the experiences of nursing students who took a clinical practicum in geriatric nursing through virtual and hybrid simulation.Methods: The study employed a mixed-method design. Participants in quantitative research were 94 nursing students (Virtual simulation group: 45, Hybrid simulation group: 49). Qualitative research was conducted with 4 focus groups (7 students per group). Quantitative data were analyzed using x2 and t-test with SPSS/WIN 23.0. Qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis.Results: The hybrid simulation group had significantly more interest in gerontological nursing (t=10.45, p=.002), sharing opinions (t=6.93, p=.010), and recognition of one's own strengths and weaknesses (t=15.90, p<.001) than the virtual simulation group. The two simulation training experiences were shown in five themes: (1) space and relationship, (2) role differences as learners, (3) higher-order thinking skills, (4) embodied knowledge by acquisition, and (5) differences in perspectives on patients. Overall, the learning attitude according to the hybrid simulation was reported to be higher than that of the virtual simulation.Conclusion: This study is meaningful in that it suggests an effective method for nursing practice for older adults by comparing the experience of virtual simulation and hybrid simulation methods in clinical practice of gerontological nursing.","PeriodicalId":52377,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17079/jkgn.2022.24.2.185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to examine the experiences of nursing students who took a clinical practicum in geriatric nursing through virtual and hybrid simulation.Methods: The study employed a mixed-method design. Participants in quantitative research were 94 nursing students (Virtual simulation group: 45, Hybrid simulation group: 49). Qualitative research was conducted with 4 focus groups (7 students per group). Quantitative data were analyzed using x2 and t-test with SPSS/WIN 23.0. Qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis.Results: The hybrid simulation group had significantly more interest in gerontological nursing (t=10.45, p=.002), sharing opinions (t=6.93, p=.010), and recognition of one's own strengths and weaknesses (t=15.90, p<.001) than the virtual simulation group. The two simulation training experiences were shown in five themes: (1) space and relationship, (2) role differences as learners, (3) higher-order thinking skills, (4) embodied knowledge by acquisition, and (5) differences in perspectives on patients. Overall, the learning attitude according to the hybrid simulation was reported to be higher than that of the virtual simulation.Conclusion: This study is meaningful in that it suggests an effective method for nursing practice for older adults by comparing the experience of virtual simulation and hybrid simulation methods in clinical practice of gerontological nursing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护生在老年护理中虚拟与混合模拟的体验:一项混合方法的研究
目的:本研究旨在透过虚拟与混合模拟的方法,探讨护生参加老年护理临床实习的经验。方法:采用混合方法设计。定量研究对象为94名护生(虚拟模拟组45名,混合模拟组49名)。定性研究分为4个焦点小组(每组7名学生)。采用SPSS/WIN 23.0软件对定量资料进行x2和t检验。定性资料采用内容分析法进行分析。结果:混合模拟组对老年护理的兴趣(t=10.45, p= 0.002)、意见分享(t=6.93, p= 0.010)、对自身优缺点的认识(t=15.90, p< 0.001)显著高于虚拟模拟组。两种模拟训练体验分别表现在5个主题上:(1)空间与关系、(2)学习者角色差异、(3)高阶思维技能、(4)习得知识体现、(5)患者视角差异。总体而言,混合仿真的学习态度高于虚拟仿真的学习态度。结论:通过对比虚拟模拟与混合模拟两种方法在老年护理临床实践中的经验,为老年人护理实践提供一种有效的方法,具有一定的研究意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
The effect of nurses’ knowledge and self-confidence on delirium nursing performance of nurses in an integrated nursing and caring services ward: A cross-sectional descriptive study Effects of sleep quality and physical activity measured by a Fitbit and self-rated questionnaire on the health-related quality of life in community-dwelling older adults: A cross-sectional study Participation experience in self-care program for type 2 diabetes: A mixed-methods study Reflection on the Publications in the Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing (2014~2023) Prevalence and risk factors of delirium of older adults after cardiac surgery at the intensive care unit: A retrospective study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1